190308AuCtteePaper2Annex1Financial Planning Report
Cairngorms National Park Authority Internal Audit Report: Financial Planning (December 2018)
Level of Assurance:
Design | Operational Effectiveness | |
---|---|---|
Assurance | Substantial | Substantial |
Contents
- Executive Summary (Page 3 – 6)
- Appendices:
- I Staff Interviewed (Page 7)
- II Definitions (Page 8)
- III Terms of Reference (Page 9 – 10)
Report Status
- Auditors: Gemma Macdonald
- Dates Work Performed: 10/12/18 — 14/12/18
- Draft Report Issued: 21/12/18
- Final Report Issued: 10/01/19
Distribution List
- David Cameron, Director of Corporate Services
- Danie Ralph, Finance Manager
Executive Summary
Overview:
This internal audit reviewed the financial planning process at Cairngorms National Park Authority (CNPA) to provide assurance and recommendations for improvement. CNPA’s budgeting process involves two cost types: core costs (fixed, allocated based on full-time equivalents) and variable activity costs. Funding comes primarily from an annual Grant in Aid from the Scottish Government. Scenario planning is used to assess the impact of various budget changes. The budget is reviewed monthly, fortnightly, and then daily from March.
Good Practice:
The audit found CNPA’s financial planning to be based on accurate, reliable information with reasonable assumptions. The process was timely, with extensive consultation, review, and approval. Budget reforecasts were conducted regularly to reflect changes or predict the outturn.
Conclusion:
The audit provided substantial assurance on the design and operational effectiveness of CNPA’s financial planning controls.
Risks Reviewed Giving Rise to No Findings of a High or Medium Significance:
- Financial plans may not be based on accurate, reliable, or relevant information.
- The financial planning process may not be carried out in a timely manner.
- Financial plans may be based on unreasonable assumptions or forecasts.
- No, or limited, scenario planning or sensitivity analysis may have been undertaken.
- Budget reforecasts may not be carried out regularly to reflect changes which may occur to plans, or to predict the outturn where expenditure in some areas differs from expectations.
- Financial plans may not be subject to effective consultation, review, or approval.
Appendix I — Staff Interviewed
Name | Job Title |
---|---|
Danie Ralph | Finance Manager |
BDO LLP appreciates the time provided by all individuals involved in this review.
Appendix II — Definitions
Level of Assurance
This section provides definitions for the level of assurance regarding design and operational effectiveness of internal controls, categorized as Substantial, Moderate, Limited, and No. It details the findings from review and the corresponding opinions for each level. The section also defines the significance of recommendations as High, Medium, and Low.
Appendix III — Terms of Reference
Background:
The audit was conducted in accordance with the 2018 – 19 Internal Audit Plan.
Purpose of Review:
To provide assurance to management and the Audit & Risk Committee on the design and effectiveness of CNPA’s financial planning controls.
Key Risks:
The key risks assessed were:
- Inaccurate, unreliable, or irrelevant information in financial plans.
- Untimely financial planning process.
- Unreasonable assumptions or forecasts.
- Limited or no scenario planning/sensitivity analysis.
- Irregular budget reforecasts.
- Ineffective consultation, review, or approval of financial plans.
Scope:
The scope of the review was to assess whether:
- Financial plans were based on reasonable assumptions and forecasts and accurate, reliable information.
- Plans were developed timely with appropriate consultation, review, and approval.
- Scenario planning and sensitivity analysis were conducted to ensure flexibility and robustness.
- Budget reforecasts were carried out regularly to reflect changes or predict outturns.
BDO LLP Information:
(Contact information for BDO LLP is included on the final page of the report).