Item5Appendix4NSGLandscape

CAIRNGORMS NATION­AL PARK AUTHOR­ITY Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Agenda Item 5 Appendix 4 26/03/2021 AGENDA ITEM 5 APPENDIX 4 NON-STAT­UTORY GUID­ANCE: POLICY 5 LANDSCAPE

PLAN­NING Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2021 Non-stat­utory guid­ance: Policy 5 — Landscape

Con­tents How to use this guid­ance 1 Intro­duc­tion and con­text. 1 Land­scape con­sid­er­a­tions in the Park. 2 Spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Park. 2 Nation­al Scen­ic Areas 2 Wild Land Areas. 3 Land­scape char­ac­ter. 4 Private roads and ways 5 Assess­ing effects of devel­op­ment on land­scape interests 7 Oth­er sources of inform­a­tion. 7

How to use this guid­ance This non-stat­utory guid­ance forms part of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2020 and applies to all plan­ning applic­a­tions with­in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. The Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan is avail­able via https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​p​l​a​n​ning- devel­op­ment/­loc­al-devel­op­ment-plan- 2020/ and should be read along­side this guid­ance. This guid­ance should be used dur­ing the pre­par­a­tion and assess­ment of plan­ning applic­a­tions to ensure that the require­ments of Policy 5 are met. Intro­duc­tion and con­text Policy 5 of the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2020 (copied in the box oppos­ite for ease of ref­er­ence) applies to all devel­op­ment and provides the frame­work for how con­sid­er­a­tion of land­scape interests should be incor­por­ated into devel­op­ment proposals.

Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2020 Policy 5 – Land­scape 5.1 Spe­cial Land­scape Qual­it­ies There will be a pre­sump­tion against any devel­op­ment that does not con­serve or enhance the land­scape char­ac­ter and spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park includ­ing wild­ness and the set­ting of the pro­posed devel­op­ment. Devel­op­ment that does not com­ple­ment or enhance the land­scape char­ac­ter of the Nation­al Park and the set­ting of the pro­posed devel­op­ment will be per­mit­ted only where: a) any sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on the spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park are clearly out­weighed by social or eco­nom­ic bene­fits of nation­al import­ance; and b) all the adverse effects on the set­ting of the pro­posed devel­op­ment have been min­im­ised and mit­ig­ated through appro­pri­ate sit­ing, lay­out, scale, design and con­struc­tion to the sat­is­fac­tion of the plan­ning author­ity. 5.2 Private Roads and Ways There will be a pre­sump­tion against new private roads and ways in open moor­land’ areas unless: a) it can be demon­strated that they are essen­tial for land man­age­ment pur­poses; and b) they are designed to min­im­ise land­scape and envir­on­ment­al impacts, and they con­serve and enhance the land­scape char­ac­ter and spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park includ­ing wild­ness; or, where appro­pri­ate c) they form part of a pro­gramme of works includ­ing the remov­al of oth­er exist­ing private roads and ways to deliv­er a net bene­fit for the spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park includ­ing wild­ness. Open Moor­lands are defined here as the land out­side enclosed farm­land, semi-improved grass­land and forests, and includes heath­er moor­land and mont­ane hab­it­ats found on high ground across the Nation­al Park.

The land­scapes of the Nation­al Park are import­ant, so devel­op­ment pro­pos­als should relate to the dis­tinct­ive char­ac­ter­ist­ics and qual­it­ies of the land­scape. All devel­op­ment pro­pos­als must demon­strate how they have avoided adverse effects on the land­scape. This guid­ance provides advice on what needs to be con­sidered and provides links to oth­er use­ful sources of inform­a­tion. In addi­tion to using this guid­ance, cross ref­er­ence to oth­er Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan policies and their guid­ance (where present) will be required to ensure that rel­ev­ant and often over­lap­ping issues are con­sidered. For example, Policy 3 design and place­mak­ing, Policy 4 nat­ur­al her­it­age and Policy 9 cul­tur­al her­it­age may apply. Land­scape con­sid­er­a­tions in the Park A devel­op­ment does not have to be loc­ated with­in or in close prox­im­ity to a spe­cif­ic land­scape or people to have an effect on them. This is because the land­scape and visu­al effects of devel­op­ment can be exper­i­enced over a large dis­tance. This means that it is import­ant to care­fully con­sider the study area for any pro­posed devel­op­ment with­in which there could be adverse effects. This is of par­tic­u­lar import­ance in the Park, which is des­ig­nated as an IUCN Cat­egory 5 Pro­tec­ted Land­scape’. All land­scapes with­in the Park have a high sens­it­iv­ity to change. The main land­scape and visu­al con­sid­er­a­tions in the Park for devel­op­ment pro­pos­als are iden­ti­fied in the fol­low­ing sec­tions. Spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Park The excep­tion­al qual­ity of the land­scape of the Park was one of the main reas­ons for its des­ig­na­tion as a Nation­al Park. The spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies (SLQs) of the Park are formed from the com­bin­a­tion of land­scape char­ac­ter and visu­al amen­ity and More inform­a­tion on IUCN Cat­egory 5 Pro­tec­ted Land­scapes can be found via https://​www​.iucn​.org/​t​h​e​m​e​/​p​r​o​t​e​cted- areas/­about/­pro­tec­ted-areas-cat­egor­ies/c­at­egory-v- pro­tec­ted-land­scape­seascape. how these are exper­i­enced by people, which in turn are influ­enced by factors such as land­form, veget­a­tion, rivers, land use, access routes and how people per­ceive and value the land­scapes with­in the Park. More inform­a­tion about the SLQs can be found via https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​c​a​ring- future/­cairngorms-land­scapes/­cairngorms- spe­cial-land­scape-qual­it­ies/. Nation­al Scen­ic Areas Nation­al Scen­ic Areas (NSAs) are defined in legis­la­tion as being areas of out­stand­ing scen­ic value in a nation­al con­text. There are two NSAs wholly with­in the Park (The Cairngorms Moun­tains NSA, Deeside and Loch­nagar NSA shown in fig­ure 1), with one fur­ther NSA just over­lap­ping the edges of the Park at Kil­liecrankie, near Blair Atholl (Loch Tum­mel NSA). Maps of the NSAs and inform­a­tion about them can be found via Site Link https://sitelink.nature.scot/home.

NatureScot² have described the spe­cial qual­it­ies of NSAs out­with the Park, and sep­ar­ately as SLQs for the Park as a whole. (The spe­cial qual­it­ies of the NSAs with­in the Park were not indi­vidu­ally described, as it was con­sidered that the NSA qual­it­ies were already described by way of the SLQs descrip­tion for the whole Park.) Inform­a­tion on the spe­cial qual­it­ies of both NSAs and the Park can be found via https://www.nature.scot/professional- advice/safe­guard­ing-pro­tec­ted-areas-and- spe­cies/­pro­tec­ted-areas/n­a­tion­al- des­ig­na­tion­s/n­a­tion­al-scen­ic-areas/nsa- spe­cial-qual­it­ies. Wild Land Areas Wild Land Areas (WLAs) were iden­ti­fied by NatureScot as the most extens­ive areas of wild­ness, meas­ured using four attrib­utes: per­ceived nat­ur­al­ness of the land cov­er; rug­ged­ness of ter­rain; remote­ness from pub­lic roads, fer­ries or rail­way sta­tions; vis­ible lack of build­ings, roads, pylons and oth­er mod­ern arte­facts. 2 formerly known as Scot­tish Nat­ur­al Her­it­age Stra­tegic Set­tle­ment Inter­me­di­ate Set­tle­ment GRANT­OWN-ON-SPEY A939 to Forres A95 to Aber­lour A9 to Inverness Glen­liv­et Dul­nain Bridge Crom­dale Carr-Bridge Nethy Bridge Tomin­toul Boat of Garten AVIEMORE AN CAMAS MÒR Strath­don A944 to Alford Glen­more Kin­craig KIN­GUSSIE Rur­al Set­tle­ment Stra­tegic Plan­ning Con­sent / New Set­tle­ment NEW­TON­MORE Lag­gan A86 to Spean Bridge Dal­whin­nie Calv­ine, Bru­ar & Pit­agow­an Insh Inver­druie & Coylumbridge Brae­mar Din­net BAL­LATER A93 to Aboyne Angus Glens Glen­shee Blair Atholl Kil­liecrankie A9 to Perth A93 to Blair­gowrie Fig­ure I — The Cairngorms Moun­tains NSA and the Deeside and Loch­nagar NSA (shown in pink) Repro­duced by per­mis­sion of Ord­nance Sur­vey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copy­right and data­base right 2021. All rights reserved. Ord­nance Sur­vey Licence num­ber 100040965 Cairngorms Nation­al Park Authority.

The qual­it­ies iden­ti­fied by NatureScot in the WLA descrip­tions also include per­cep­tu­al attrib­utes, such as a sense of sanc­tu­ary, inspir­a­tion of awe, etc. Two WLAs are found mainly with­in the Park (WLAs 15 Cairngorms and 16 Loch­nagar — Mount Keen), with three more over­lap­ping the edges of the Park (WLAs 14 Ran­noch – Nevis – Mamores Alder, 19 Braeroy – Glen­shira – Cre­ag Mea­gaidh and 20 Mon­adh­liath) (fig­ure 2). Maps and inform­a­tion about the WLAs, includ­ing their wild­ness qual­it­ies, can be found via https://www.nature.scot/wild- land-area-descrip­tions. Land­scape char­ac­ter The Nation­al Park is char­ac­ter­ised into dif­fer­ent land­scape char­ac­ter areas. With­in each area, there is a con­sist­ency of key land­scape char­ac­ter­ist­ics influ­enced by aspects such as topo­graphy, land use, his­tor­ic land­scape fea­tures and set­tle­ment, as well as how the land­scape is exper­i­enced. Stra­tegic Set­tle­ment Inter­me­di­ate Set­tle­ment GRANT­OWN-ON-SPEY A939 to Forres A95 to Aber­lour A9 to Inverness Glen­liv­et Dul­nain Bridge Crom­dale Carr-Bridge Nethy Bridge Tomin­toul Boat of Garten AVIEMORE Strath­don AN CAMAS MÒR A944 to Alford Glen­more Kin­craig Rur­al Set­tle­ment Stra­tegic Plan­ning Con­sent / New Set­tle­ment KIN­GUSSIE NEW­TON­MORE Lag­gan A86 to Spean Bridge Dal­whin­nie Calv­ine, Bru­ar & Pit­agow­an Insh Inver­druie & Coylumbridge Brae­mar Din­net BAL­LATER A93 to Aboyne Angus Glens Glen­shee Blair Atholl Kil­liecrankie A9 to Perth A93 to Blair­gowrie Fig­ure 2 area of the Park covered by Wild Land Areas (shown in pink) Repro­duced by per­mis­sion of Ord­nance Sur­vey on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copy­right and data­base right 2021. All rights reserved. Ord­nance Sur­vey Licence num­ber 100040965 Cairngorms Nation­al Park Authority

With­in the glens and straths there is more diversity of land­scapes in a smal­ler area, where­as in the uplands the land­scape tends to be sim­il­ar over much lar­ger areas. NatureScot have iden­ti­fied and mapped broad land­scape char­ac­ter types across Scot­land. Inform­a­tion and map­ping is avail­able via https://www.nature.scot/professional- advice/­land­scape/­land­scape-char­ac­ter- assess­ment/scot­tish-land­scape-char­ac­ter- types-map-and-descrip­tions. The Park Author­ity has iden­ti­fied and described land­scape char­ac­ter­ist­ics with­in the Park bound­ary, identi­fy­ing smal­ler areas of dis­tinct­ive char­ac­ter­ist­ics. This can help with assess­ment of smal­ler scale devel­op­ment pro­pos­als, and is avail­able via https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​c​a​ring- future/­cairngorms-land­scapes/­land­scape- areas/​. Private roads and ways The term ​‘private roads and ways’ has spe­cif­ic mean­ing in plan­ning³, being any road or path that is not main­tained at the pub­lic expense. How­ever private roads and ways tend to be exper­i­enced by the pub­lic as vehicle tracks (fig­ure 3), so are com­monly referred to as ​‘tracks’ or ​‘hill tracks’. In this guid­ance, the term ​‘tracks’ is used as an inclus­ive term for all ​‘private roads and ways’ Fig­ure 3 — vehicle track with­in the Park 3 See Appendix F of the Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment Plan­ning Cir­cu­lar on Non-Domest­ic Per­mit­ted Devel­op­ment Rights, avail­able via https://www.gov.scot/publications/planning- circular‑2 – 2015-con­sol­id­ated-cir­cu­lar-non- domest­ic-per­mit­ted-devel­op­ment/pages/11/ The con­struc­tion and main­ten­ance of tracks fall under two dif­fer­ent areas of the plan­ning sys­tem: those requir­ing plan­ning per­mis­sion, and those that have per­mit­ted devel­op­ment rights. Most tracks are likely to require full plan­ning per­mis­sion. The excep­tions to this are forestry and agri­cul­tur­al tracks, which may be per­mit­ted devel­op­ment but still need to go through the pri­or noti­fic­a­tion pro­cess to enable the rel­ev­ant plan­ning author­ity to advise wheth­er per­mit­ted devel­op­ment applies in the par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances, or if plan­ning per­mis­sion is required. This is because the rules around what is/​is not per­mit­ted devel­op­ment and under what cir­cum­stances are com­plex. For example, most per­mit­ted devel­op­ment rights do not apply in Nation­al Scen­ic Areas¹. 4 See Devel­op­ment Man­age­ment and NSAs, avail­able via https://www.nature.scot/professional- advice/safe­guard­ing-pro­tec­ted-areas-and- spe­cies/­pro­tec­ted-areas/n­a­tion­al- des­ig­na­tion­s/n­a­tion­al-scen­ic-areas/devel­op­ment- management-and

A939 to Forres A95 to Aber­lour GRANT­OWN-ON-SPEY A9 to Inverness Glen­liv­et Dul­nain Bridge Crom­dale Carr-Bridge Nethy Bridge Tomin­toul Boat of Garten AVIEMORE Strath­don AN CAMAS MÒR A944 to Alford Glen­more Kin­craig The Park Author­ity guid­ance on Plan­ning Per­mis­sion and Per­mit­ted Devel­op­ment Rights for Agri­cul­tur­al and Forestry Private Ways should there­fore be referred to. Regard­less of the pro­cess tracks go through, the devel­op­ment of a track can have land­scape and visu­al effects far great­er than the foot­print of a track itself. This can be reduced by sens­it­ive sit­ing and design, and fol­low­ing good prac­tice dur­ing con­struc­tion and main­ten­ance. How­ever in some loc­a­tions sig­ni­fic­ant adverse land­scape and visu­al effects are unavoid­able and so tracks will not be appro­pri­ate (fig­ure 4). To avoid issues at a later stage, advice on wheth­er plan­ning or per­mit­ted devel­op­ment applies and the poten­tial for adverse effects should be sought from the rel­ev­ant plan­ning author­ity at the earli­est stage for both new tracks and pro­posed upgrades to exist­ing tracks. Stra­tegic Set­tle­ment Inter­me­di­ate Set­tle­ment Rur­al Set­tle­ment Stra­tegic Plan­ning Con­sent / New Set­tle­ment KIN­GUSSIE NEW­TON­MORE Lag­gan A86 to Spean Bridge Dal­whin­nie Calv­ine, Bru­ar & Pit­agow­an Insh Inver­druie & Coylumbridge Brae­mar Din­net BAL­LATER A93 to Aboyne 0 Angus Glens Glen­shee Blair Atholl Kil­liecrankie A9 to Perth A93 to Blair­gowrie 5 https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/wp- content/​uploads/​2019/​10/​101019PANForestryandA griculturalTracksFINAL.pdf 6 Con­struc­ted Tracks in the Scot­tish Uplands https://www.nature.scot/constructed-tracks- scot­tish-uplands Fig­ure 4 — upland and moor­land clas­si­fic­a­tions cov­er­ing the Park, shown in pink. The effect of Policy 5.2 is that there will be a pre­sump­tion against new hill tracks in these areas. Repro­duced by per­mis­sion of Ord­nance Sur­vey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copy­right and data­base right

1. All rights reserved. Ord­nance Sur­vey Licence num­ber 100040965 Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity An inter­act­ive ver­sion of this map is avail­able via https://​nation​al​park​scot​.maps​.arc​gis​.com/​a​p​p​s​/​M​a​p​J​o​u​r​n​a​l​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​t​m​l​?​a​p​p​i​d​=​4​2​2​d​7​2​6​a​1​6​a​0​4​f​f​8​9​aa1cf 23407c8b7f.

Assess­ing effects of devel­op­ment on land­scape interests The assess­ment of land­scape and visu­al impacts should fol­low the pro­cess and incor­por­ate the mit­ig­a­tion hier­archy shown in fig­ure 5 (over­leaf) from the out­set. This should enable devel­op­ment to be designed to avoid, min­im­ise and mit­ig­ate adverse effects while optim­ising oppor­tun­it­ies. Details of the assess­ments car­ried out and how they have been used to inform the sit­ing and design of the pro­posed devel­op­ment should be sub­mit­ted with plan­ning applic­a­tions as sup­port­ing inform­a­tion. Assess­ments should include con­sid­er­a­tion of effects dur­ing con­struc­tion and oper­a­tion over the life cycle of the pro­posed devel­op­ment, as well as wheth­er there could be cumu­lat­ive effects with oth­er devel­op­ment (exist­ing and pro­posed). Table I (shown after fig­ure 5) iden­ti­fies dif­fer­ent types of assess­ment that may be required to sup­port devel­op­ment pro­pos­als in the Park. The num­ber and level of assessment(s) will vary depend­ing on the type of devel­op­ment pro­posed and the sens­it­iv­it­ies of the pro­posed devel­op­ment site and sur­round­ing area. Table 2 provides ref­er­ences and links to sources of guid­ance and inform­a­tion cur­rent at the time of pub­lic­a­tion. Many of these sources are provided by oth­er organ­isa­tions so will be sub­ject to change over time. Read­ers should ensure that they use the most up to date pub­lished ver­sion. If in doubt, advice should be sought from the pub­lish­er and/​or rel­ev­ant plan­ning author­ity. Some devel­op­ment pro­pos­als may require form­al detailed Land­scape and Visu­al Impact Assess­ment (LVIA) as part of an Envir­on­ment­al Impact Assess­ment’, while oth­ers may only require some of the 7 More inform­a­tion about Envir­on­ment­al Impact Assess­ment can be found via https://www.nature.scot/professional- advice/­plan­ning-and-devel­op­ment/en­vir­on­ment­al- assess­ment/en­vir­on­ment­al-impact-assess­ment. assess­ments iden­ti­fied in Table 1. There­fore early engage­ment with the rel­ev­ant plan­ning author­ity is strongly recom­men­ded so that the scope and type(s) of land­scape assess­ment can be agreed at the earli­est stage for each pro­posed devel­op­ment. Oth­er sources of inform­a­tion In addi­tion to the sources lis­ted in Table 2, the fol­low­ing are of rel­ev­ance: Place­mak­ing: guid­ance on place­mak­ing in the Park can be found via link to be added once pub­lished Dark skies: inform­a­tion on the Tomin­toul and Glen­liv­et Dark Skies Park can be found via https://darkskies.glenlivet- cairngorms​.co​.uk/. Advice on devel­op­ment in the dark skies area can be found via link to be added once published

Land­scape assess­ment and design pro­cess Step 1: Define the broad scope of the assess­ment by identi­fy­ing land­scape des­ig­na­tions and known land­scape sens­it­iv­it­ies (eg the Nation­al Park, NSAs, WLAs, scen­ic routes etc) Step 2a: Identi­fy baseline land­scape and visu­al con­di­tions (includ­ing SLQS, land­scape char­ac­ter, visu­al amen­ity, etc, as rel­ev­ant). Mit­ig­a­tion hier­archy Step 2b: Identi­fy and assess sens­it­iv­it­ies (and oppor­tun­it­ies) of baseline land­scape and visu­al con­di­tions in rela­tion to devel­op­ment type and size. Step 3: Devel­op design object­ives for the pro­posed devel­op­ment site in dir­ect response to the sens­it­iv­it­ies and oppor­tun­it­ies of the baseline land­scape and visu­al con­di­tions. Avoid Avoid inap­pro­pri­ate loc­a­tions; places where there would be likely sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects whatever the design and/​or man­age­ment of a scheme. Min­im­ise: primary mit­ig­a­tion Design devel­op­ment to min­im­ise adverse land­scape and visu­al effects. Step 4: Site and design the pro­posed devel­op­ment fol­low­ing the land­scape and visu­al design object­ives as well as oth­er con­sid­er­a­tions (eg nat­ur­al her­it­age, roads require­ments, etc). Step 5: Assess the pre­dicted land­scape and visu­al effects of the designed devel­op­ment against the baseline con­di­tions. Min­im­ise : sec­ond­ary mit­ig­a­tion If sig­ni­fic­ant adverse land­scape and visu­al effects are iden­ti­fied, explore altern­at­ives and amend the design to reduce these effects. Com­pensate Step 6: Identi­fy the pre­dicted resid­ual effects of the pro­posed devel­op­ment after incor­por­at­ing mit­ig­a­tion. In excep­tion­al cir­cum­stances where resid­ual adverse land­scape and visu­al effects can­not be avoided, off-set these through on-site envir­on­ment­al com­pens­a­tion or, as a last resort, off-site envir­on­ment­al com­pens­a­tion. Fig­ure 5‑standard land­scape assess­ment and design pro­cess, incor­por­at­ing the mit­ig­a­tion hierarchy

6 Table I sources of guid­ance and inform­a­tion for dif­fer­ent steps in the land­scape assess­ment and design pro­cess (links and ref­er­ences are provided in Table 2) Exist­ing guidance/​information ( if rel­ev­ant to the type of devel­op­ment being pro­posed) Steps in the assess­ment pro­cess I Define scope of assess­ment All steps below: use the mit­ig­a­tion hier­archy to identi­fy mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures 2 Assess (a) baseline con­di­tions and (b) sens­it­iv­it­ies 3 Devel­op design object­ives 4 Site and design pro­posed devel­op­ment 5 Assess and describe pre­dicted effects then repeat for 6 Identi­fy pre­dicted resid­ual effects after incor­por­at­ing mit­ig­a­tion • Effects on land­scape char­ac­ter • Effects on visu­al amen­ity • Effects on SLQs • Effects on WLAS • Effects on designed land­scapes • Cumu­lat­ive effects • Illus­tra­tions to inform assess­ment of effects Guidelines for Land­scape & Visu­al Impact Assess­ment Cumu­lat­ive LVIA NSA and Park SLQ descrip­tions Effects on NSA and Park SLQS WLA descrip­tions Effects on WLAS Land­scape Char­ac­ter Type/​area descrip­tions NPF / SPP Cre­at­ing Places  Design state­ments Res­id­en­tial visu­al amen­ity assess­ment Tracks * ✓

✓

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

• sans

Wind farms* Visualisations ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

✓

Table 2 – links and ref­er­ences for the guid­ance referred to in Table I Guid­ance name Guidelines for Land­scape and Visu­al Impact Assess­ment (GLVIA) Ref­er­ence Land­scape Insti­tute and Insti­tute of Envir­on­ment­al Link Man­age­ment and Assess­ment (2013) Guidelines for Land­scape https://​www​.land​scapein​sti​tute​.org/​t​e​c​h​n​i​c​a​l​/​g​l​v​i​a​3​-​p​anel/ and Visu­al Impact Assess­ment. 3^rd ed. Abing­don, Rout­ledge. Cumu­lat­ive LVIA NSA and Park SLQ descrip­tions Effects on NSA and Park SLQS WLA descrip­tions Gen­er­al: GLVIA as above. For wind farms: NatureScot (2012) Guid­ance – Assess­ing the cumu­lat­ive impact of onshore wind energy devel­op­ments. NatureScot (2010) The Spe­cial Qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Scen­ic Areas: NatureScot Com­mis­sioned Report No. 374 NatureScot and CNPA (2010) The spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. NatureScot Com­mis­sioned Report No 375 Gen­er­al: as above. For wind farms: https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/planning-and- devel­op­ment/ad­vice-plan­ners-and-developer­s/re­new­able-energy- devel­op­ment/on­shore-wind-energy/ad­vice-wind-farm Both avail­able via: https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/safeguarding- pro­tec­ted-areas-and-spe­cies/­pro­tec­ted-areas/n­a­tion­al-des­ig­na­tion­s/n­a­tion­al- scen­ic-areas/nsa-spe­cial-qual­it­ies NatureScot (2018) Guid­ance for assess­ing the effects on spe­cial link to be added once pub­lished land­scape qual­it­ies. cur­rently in draft NatureScot (2017) Wild Land Area Descrip­tions: 14 Ran­noch Nevis – Mamores – Alder, 15 Cairngorms; and 16 Loch­nagar Mount Keen, 19 Braeroy — Glen­shira — Cre­ag Mea­gaidh and 20 https://www.nature.scot/wild-land-area-descriptions Mon­adh­liath Effects on WLAS NatureScot (2017) Assess­ing impacts on Wild Land Areas: Tech­nic­al guid­ance Land­scape Char­ac­ter Type (LCT)/area descrip­tions NatureScot (2019) land­scape char­ac­ter types map­ping and inform­a­tion CNPA land­scape char­ac­ter areas map­ping and inform­a­tion https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/landscape/landscape-policy-and- guid­ance/assess­ing-impacts-wild-land-areas-draft-guid­ance NatureScot LCT descrip­tions: https://www.nature.scot/professional- advice/­land­scape/­land­scape-char­ac­ter-assess­ment/scot­tish-land­scape- char­ac­ter-types-map-and-descrip­tions CNPA land­scape char­ac­ter area descrip­tions: https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​c​a​ring- future/­cairngorms-land­scapes/­land­scape-areas/

Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work (NPF) and Scot­tish Plan­ning Policy (SPP) Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment (2014) Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work and Scot­tish Plan­ning Policy Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment (2013) Cre­at­ing Places: a policy state­ment on archi­tec­ture and place for Scot­land https://www.gov.scot/policies/planning-architecture/ https://www.gov.scot/publications/creating-places-policy-statement- archi­tec­ture-place-scot­land/ https://www.gov.scot/publications/planning-advice-note-68-design-statements/ https://​www​.land​scapein​sti​tute​.org/​t​e​c​h​n​i​c​a​l​-​r​e​s​o​u​r​c​e​/​rvaa/ Cre­at­ing Places Design state­ments Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment (2003) Pan 68: Design State­ments. Res­id­en­tial visu­al amen­ity Land­scape Insti­tute (2019) Res­id­en­tial Visu­al Amen­ity assess­ment Assess­ment (RVAA) Tech­nic­al Guid­ance Note ²⁄₁₉ (RVAA) Tracks 2^nd ed. good-prac­tice-con­struc­tion CIRIA: SuDS Woods Bal­lard et al. (2015) The SuDS Manu­al (C697). CIRIA Land­scape Insti­tute (2014) Man­age­ment and Main­ten­ance of Sus­tain­able Drain­age Sys­tems (SuDS) Land­scapes https://​www​.ciria​.org/​I​t​e​m​D​e​t​a​i​l​?​i​P​r​o​d​u​c​t​C​o​d​e​=​C​7​5​3​F​&​C​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​=​F​R​E​EPUBS https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/planning-and- NatureScot (2015) Con­struc­ted tracks in the Scot­tish uplands. devel­op­ment/ad­vice-plan­ners-and-developer­s/­plan­ning-and-devel­op­ment- Wind farms Visu­al­isa­tions NatureScot (2017) Sit­ing and design­ing wind farms in the land­scape (ver­sion 3a) Land­scape Insti­tute (2019) Visu­al rep­res­ent­a­tion of devel­op­ment pro­pos­als NatureScot (2017) Visu­al rep­res­ent­a­tion of wind farms Land­scape Insti­tute: https://​www​.land​scapein​sti​tute​.org/​t​e​c​h​n​ical- resource/sus­tain­able-drain­age-sys­tem­s/ https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/planning-and- devel­op­ment/ad­vice-plan­ners-and-developer­s/re­new­able-energy- devel­op­ment/on­shore-wind-energy/wind-farm-impacts Land­scape Insti­tute: https://​www​.land​scapein​sti​tute​.org/​v​i​s​u​a​l​i​s​a​tion/ NatureScot: https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/planning-and- devel­op­ment/ad­vice-plan­ners-and-developer­s/re­new­able-energy- dever devel­op­ment/on­shore-wind-energy/wind-farm-impacts

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2020 Non-stat­utory guid­ance Policy 5 – Land­scape This doc­u­ment is avail­able in large print on request. Please con­tact the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity on 01479 873535. It is also avail­able to view at www​.cairngorms​.co​.uk Pub­lished by Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity 14 The Square Grant­own-on-Spey PH26 3HG Email: planning@​cairngorms.​co.​uk Tel: 01479 873535 Fax: 01479 873527 www​.cairngorms​.co​.uk © CNPA 2021. All rights reserved.