Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

NPPP 2022 SEA Scoping Report: Topic 1 Climate Change

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan, SEA scop­ing Baseline inform­a­tion Top­ic I – Cli­mat­ic factors

Con­tents Ques­tions for con­sulta­tion author­it­ies 1 Con­text 2 His­tor­ic cli­mate trends 2 Future cli­mate pro­jec­tions 3 Green­house gas emis­sions 5 Pro­posed SEA objectives ।।

Ques­tions for con­sulta­tion authorities

  1. Is there any­thing miss­ing from the Top­ic baseline?
  2. Are there any errors in what is presented?
  3. Are there any new ini­ti­at­ives, research pro­jects, plans, pro­grammes or strategies or oth­er things that will be report­ing / imple­men­ted over the next 12 – 18 months that are rel­ev­ant to the Top­ic, which may need to be included as the SEA progresses?

Con­text Scot­land has a tem­per­ate cli­mate with cool sum­mers and mild win­ters. As a whole it is influ­enced by pre­dom­in­antly west­erly depres­sions altern­at­ing with less fre­quent settled peri­ods. A range of factors, includ­ing topo­graphy, lat­it­ude and alti­tude, affect these weath­er sys­tems at a more loc­al level.

Rain­fall is spread through­out the year but there are region­al dif­fer­ences. For example, the east­erly pos­i­tion of the Cairngorms mas­sif res­ults in a cli­mate that is less ocean­ic, and there­fore drier, than the west of Scot­land. The moun­tains exert a notice­able rain shad­ow effect that reduced the amount of rain­fall on the east­ern side of the country.

Scot­land is cur­rently exper­i­en­cing cli­mate change, which owing to the glob­al emis­sion of green­house gasses, is likely to con­tin­ue into the future. The pre­dicted effects of cli­mate change, cur­rently sup­por­ted by observed data, include hot­ter, drier sum­mers; milder win­ters; increased fre­quency and intens­ity of extreme rain­fall; reduced snow­fall. The area with­in the Park bound­ary will be affected by cli­mate change.

His­tor­ic cli­mate trends His­tor­ic­al cli­mate data is provided by the Brae­mar weath­er sta­tion. It is recog­nised that using Brae­mar is a blunt proxy for the Park as a whole, how­ever it is the only data source avail­able for the Park. In addi­tion it is some dis­tance from large scale urb­an­isa­tion so is likely to reflect the nature of the cli­mate with­in the Park.

Records from the weath­er sta­tion indic­ate that the Park is exper­i­en­cing a decrease in the num­ber of days of air frost and an increase in annu­al rain­fall (fig­ures 1, 2 and 3).

Fig­ure I — Met Office max­im­um and min­im­um monthly aver­age tem­per­at­ures recor­ded at Brae­mar weath­er sta­tion dur­ing 1959 — 2018

Fig­ure 2 — Met Office rain­fall recor­ded at Brae­mar weath­er sta­tion dur­ing 1959 — 2018

Fig­ure 3 – Met Office days of frost at Brae­mar weath­er sta­tion dur­ing 1959 — 2018 This is con­sist­ent with broad­er trends across Scot­land, where tem­per­at­ures have ris­en by around 0.8 degrees since 1980, with increased heavy pre­cip­it­a­tion events con­trib­ut­ing to an increase in winter rain­fall versus decreases in sum­mer rainfall.

Future cli­mate pro­jec­tions Prob­able pro­jec­tions avail­able from the UK Cli­mate Pro­jec­tions (UKCP18) web­site (https://​www​.met​of​fice​.gov​.uk/​r​e​s​e​a​r​c​h​/​a​p​p​r​o​a​c​h​/​c​o​l​l​a​b​o​r​a​t​i​o​n​/​u​k​c​p​/​index) are avail­able for high, medi­um and low emis­sion scen­ari­os, with the latest pro­jec­tions down to a loc­al res­ol­u­tion of 2.2 km². How­ever the degree of uncer­tainty changes with the scale of res­ol­u­tion, so the data used for the scop­ing baseline is for the 25km² area includ­ing Braemar.

This is help­ful as it increases the reli­ab­il­ity of the pro­jec­tions and includes the Brae­mar weath­er sta­tion used to record the actu­al cli­mat­ic changes shown since the 1960s, allow­ing com­par­is­ons to be made. The lack of clar­ity around the impact of feed­back loops (such as the albedo effect due to a reduc­tion in sur­face sea ice or meth­ane release from thaw­ing arc­tic tun­dra) also increases uncertainty.

From the baseline of 1981 – 2000, by 2050 under the medi­um emis­sions scen­ario the cent­ral estim­ate for Brae­mar is for a 1.2°C increase in mean annu­al tem­per­at­ure (fig­ure 4). How­ever, the 5th per­cent­ile estim­ate is for a minor decrease of ‑0.2°C & the 95th per­cent­ile estim­ates is for an increase of 2.7°C (fig­ure 5), sug­gest­ing sig­ni­fic­ant uncer­tainty. The medi­um emis­sions scen­ario also pre­dicts an accel­er­ated tem­per­at­ure increase after 2050.

Fig­ure 4UKCP18 cent­ral estim­ates for mean change in annu­al tem­per­at­ure for grid box num­ber 612, Brae­mar area

Fig­ure 5 — UKCP18 cent­ral, 5th and 95th per­cent­ile estim­ates for mean change in annu­al tem­per­at­ure for a medi­um emis­sions scen­ario (baseline 1981 – 2000, RCP 6.0) for 612, Brae­mar area

There is sub­stan­tial uncer­tainty regard­ing aver­age pre­cip­it­a­tion pro­jec­tions, with UKCP18 con­sid­er­ing that pre­cip­it­a­tion is less cor­rel­ated to emis­sion levels than tem­per­at­ure. How­ever the num­ber of extreme pre­cip­it­a­tion events is fore­cast to rise, with win­ters con­tinu­ing the trend of being wet­ter and sum­mers being drier (fig­ure 6).

Fig­ure 6 — UKCP18 cent­ral estim­ate for mean change in pre­cip­it­a­tion for grid box num­ber 612 (Brae­mar area) for 100 years from 2000

It should be noted that the use of the medi­um emis­sions scen­ario com­bined with the cent­ral prob­ab­il­ity pro­jec­tion rep­res­ents a rel­at­ively con­ser­vat­ive pic­ture of the pos­sible future cli­mate for the Park. Adjust­ing these vari­ables, par­tic­u­larly the emis­sions scen­ario, can lead to more sig­ni­fic­ant pro­jec­ted changes. For example, the medi­um emis­sions scen­ario gives a cent­ral estim­ate tem­per­at­ure rise of 3.2°C by 2099, whilst the 95th prob­ab­il­ity per­cent­ile gives a tem­per­at­ure rise of 5.6°C. Giv­en the exper­i­ence of the approx­im­ate I°C rise since the 1950s, increases of a fur­ther 3°C are likely to have a sig­ni­fic­ant impact on life as cur­rently exper­i­enced in the Park.

Green­house gas emis­sions The causes of cli­mate change are great­er than loc­al in scale and there is a strong glob­al con­sensus that a reduc­tion in green­house gas emis­sions is needed to avoid some sig­ni­fic­antly adverse effects. The Scot­tish Green­house Gas Emis­sions 2017 report (https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/statistics/2019/06/sc ottish-green­house-gas-emis­sions-2017/­doc­u­ment­s/scot­tish-green­house-gas-emis­sions- 2017/scottish-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2017/govscot%3Adocument/scottish-greenhouse- gas-emissions-2017.pdf) provides fig­ures for sources of green­house gases (table I and fig­ure 7)

Table I – amount and pro­por­tion of green­house gas emis­sions by source for Scot­land in 2017

Fig­ure 7 — green­house gas emis­sions by source for Scot­land in 2017

The UK Nation­al Atmo­spher­ic Emis­sions Invent­ory maps green­house gas emis­sions. Fig­ure 8 shows a sub­set of this data for the Park area. The most sig­ni­fic­ant car­bon diox­ide emis­sions are asso­ci­ated with road trans­port cor­ridors and set­tle­ments. Oth­er emis­sion sources are present in the Park, for example asso­ci­ated with agri­cul­tur­al prac­tices and the Gran­ish land­fill site near Aviemore. Due to topo­graphy and cli­mate, the Park has lim­ited land suit­able for the low­land agri­cul­tur­al prac­tices com­pared to upland land uses, mean­ing that emis­sions from agri­cul­ture are also lim­ited. Forestry has the capa­city to be a sig­ni­fic­ant car­bon sink, although it is unclear wheth­er the data con­siders emis­sions from plant­ing, man­age­ment and extrac­tion pro­cesses or just sequest­ra­tion from grow­ing trees.

Fig­ure 8 — car­bon diox­ide (as car­bon) emis­sions in tonnes for the Park in 2017 (km² data smoothed in map rep­res­ent­a­tion) Annu­al­ised data for nation­al parks is not avail­able. To get an approx­im­a­tion of the con­tri­bu­tion of the Park, fur­ther ana­lys­is of data from the 2019 Depart­ment of Busi­ness, Energy and Industry Strategy (https://​ukcli​mate​pro​jec​tions​-ui​.met​of​fice​.gov​.uk/) has been required. Mid-year pop­u­la­tion estim­ates have been used as a proxy for pro­por­tion­ally attrib­ut­ing the emis­sions of the Loc­al Author­it­ies areas with­in the Park to the Park itself. It is recog­nised that this is a blunt means of estim­a­tion, par­tic­u­larly in terms of com­mer­cial and trans­port data.

In the absence of a detailed car­bon-audit, fig­ures 9 and 10 offer an altern­at­ive baseline. It should be noted that there are a num­ber of oth­er issues with emis­sions data for the Park:

  • It has not been pos­sible to include land use and forestry data. It is only being avail­able at Loc­al Author­ity scale rather than smal­ler datazones that could be aligned with the Park bound­ary, and the broad land uses of the wider Loc­al Author­ity areas are unlikely to be rep­res­ent­at­ive of the land uses with­in the Park. This cre­ates a high degree of uncer­tainty as to the accur­acy of estim­a­tions for this data regard­ing the land uses in the Park which vary from the lar­ger scale Loc­al Author­ity areas. Instead, data on industrial/​commercial, domest­ic and trans­port emis­sions has been used, as this data is avail­able at a rel­ev­ant scale.

  • Inform­a­tion on EU Emis­sions Trad­ing Sys­tem indus­tri­al install­a­tions is not part of the avail­able data­set. How­ever as these tend to be power sta­tions and high energy usage indus­tri­al plants, this should not sig­ni­fic­antly affect the data used due to the lack of such facil­it­ies in the Park.

  • The emis­sions from gas, a fuel source that is only avail­able via private sup­ply in the Park, have been sub­sumed and estim­ated as a gen­er­al­ised emis­sion source in the over­all domest­ic, industry and com­mer­cial categories.

  • The energy con­sumed by tour­ists and vis­it­ors to the Park has not been adjus­ted for, as data is unlikely to have been col­lec­ted at a level that would provide mean­ing­ful res­ults. (For example break­ing down how tour­ists and vis­it­ors move through the Park, the energy effi­ciency of where they stay, how they use energy while on hol­i­day, etc.)

Non­ethe­less, the data that is avail­able provides an indic­a­tion of the broad emis­sions source types and trends over time.

In the Park, the main source of emis­sions has been indus­tri­al and com­mer­cial, how­ever in recent years this has reduced while trans­port emis­sions have increased, becom­ing the lead­ing source of emis­sions in the Park. How­ever, over­all the trend has been for a com­bined reduc­tion in emis­sions per per­son in the Park between 2005 — 2017. There is marked vari­ation between the Loc­al Author­ity areas with­in the Park (fig­ure 11). This is likely a reflec­tion of the dif­fer­ent make up of the Loc­al Author­ity areas for example the vary­ing types of business/​industrial activ­it­ies and travel to work dis­tances in each of the dif­fer­ent Loc­al Author­ity areas (see Top­ic 8, Pop­u­la­tion and human health).

Fig­ure 9 — estim­ated CO2 emis­sions for the Park for the peri­od 2005 to 2017 by source type

Fig­ure 10 — estim­ated CO2 emis­sions per per­son for the Park for the peri­od 2005 to 2017

Fig­ure 11 — estim­ated CO2 emis­sions per per­son for the peri­od 2005 to 2017, by Loc­al Author­ity area, com­pared to emis­sions per per­son for the Park as a whole

With regard to meth­ane, anoth­er green­house gas, the only facil­ity with­in the Park that con­trib­utes towards the Scot­tish Pol­lut­ant Release Invent­ory is Gran­ish land­fill site, which is oper­ated by the High­land Coun­cil. Estim­ates of the meth­ane emis­sions for the site indic­ate a trend for sud­den sig­ni­fic­ant reduc­tions in emis­sions which then plat­eau (Fig­ure 12).

Fig­ure 12 — estim­ated meth­ane emis­sions from Gran­ish land­fill site, 2003 to 2017

Although the over­all trend in green­house gas emis­sions is down­ward in the Park, it is likely that sub­stan­tial fur­ther decreases will be required to meet the emis­sions tar­gets of the Cli­mate Change (Emis­sions Reduc­tion Tar­gets) (Scot­land) Bill 2019.

Pro­posed SEA object­ives SEA main object­ive | Sub-object­ive —-| — - la: Reduce the emis­sions of green­house gases with par­tic­u­lar focus on emis­sions from build­ings, trans­port, energy gen­er­a­tion and industry (espe­cially CO2), but also from nat­ur­al car­bon sinks (such as wood­lands and peat­lands). | Will there be an effect on energy con­ser­va­tion and effi­ciency in new devel­op­ment? | Will there be an effect on the pro­duc­tion of renew­able energy of appro­pri­ate scale for the Park? | Will there be an effect on loc­al pro­duc­tion and use of mater­i­als and food pro­duce? | Will there be an effect on car­bon sinks (such as wood­lands and peat­lands)? | Will there be an effect on travel that pro­duces green­house gas emis­sions? Ib: Ensure exist­ing and pro­posed infra­struc­ture and build­ings are loc­ated and designed to cope with future cli­mate con­di­tions. | Con­sid­er­ing future implic­a­tions of cli­mate change (eg increased sever­ity of weath­er res­ult­ing in more flood­ing, peri­ods of drought and extremes of tem­per­at­ure), will there be an effect on exist­ing infra­struc­ture and build­ings? | Con­sid­er­ing future implic­a­tions of cli­mate change (eg increased sever­ity of weath­er res­ult­ing in more flood­ing, peri­ods of drought and extremes of tem­per­at­ure), will there be an effect on infra­struc­ture and build­ings pro­posed in the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan?

×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!