Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

NPPP 2022 SEA Scoping Report: Topic 6 Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan, SEA scop­ing Baseline inform­a­tion Top­ic 6 – Biod­iversity, flora and fauna

Con­tents

Ques­tions for con­sulta­tion author­it­ies 1 Con­text 1 Areas pro­tec­ted for nature con­ser­va­tion 2 Nation­al Nature Reserves 5 Cairngorms Nature Action Plan (CNAP) pri­or­it­ies 5 Wood­land hab­it­ats 7 Upland hab­it­ats 9 Low­land hab­it­ats 10 Fresh­wa­ter and wet­land hab­it­ats 10 Scot­tish wild­cat 13 Moun­tain hare 14 Caper­cail­lie 15 Cur­lew 15 CNAP rap­tors: golden eagle, per­eg­rine fal­con and hen har­ri­er 16 Fresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sel 16 Oth­er issues affect­ing biod­iversity — deer 17 Oth­er issues affect­ing biod­iversity ‑dis­eases, non-nat­ive spe­cies 18 Pro­posed SEA object­ives 20

Ques­tions for con­sulta­tion authorities

  1. Is there any­thing miss­ing from the Top­ic baseline?
  2. Are there any errors in what is presented?
  3. Are there any new ini­ti­at­ives, research pro­jects, plans, pro­grammes or strategies or oth­er things that will be report­ing / imple­men­ted over the next 12 – 18 months that are rel­ev­ant to the Top­ic, which may need to be included as the SEA progresses?

Con­text

The Cairngorms Nation­al Park is a nation­ally and inter­na­tion­ally import­ant haven for nature and wild­life. The Nation­al Park cov­ers less than two per cent of the UK land­mass but is home to 25% of its rare anim­al, insect, lichen, fungi and insect spe­cies. Hab­it­ats are rich and var­ied, from mont­ane alpine hab­it­ats high on the Cairngorms plat­eaux; fresh­wa­ter and ripari­an hab­it­ats of the renowned sal­mon rivers the Spey, Dee, Tay and South Esk; peat­land hab­it­ats import­ant for stor­ing car­bon; Cale­do­ni­an pine wood­lands, home of the rare caper­cail­lie; to stands of aspen in Strath­spey sup­port­ing rare insects and fungi.

The hab­it­ats and spe­cies that baseline inform­a­tion is provided for have been selec­ted as those iden­ti­fied as pri­or­it­ies in the Cairngorms Nature Action Plan 2019 (https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​w​o​r​k​i​n​g​-​t​o​g​e​t​h​e​r​/​a​u​t​h​o​r​i​t​y​/​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​-​p​a​r​k​-​s​t​r​a​t​e​g​i​e​s​/​cnap/) for focussed atten­tion and action, plus oth­er hab­it­ats that the future NPPP has the poten­tial to have an effect on, either pos­it­ive or neg­at­ive, based on the broad top­ic areas covered in the cur­rent NPPP.

Of rel­ev­ance to the baseline, a num­ber of part­ner­ship pro­jects are under­way in the Park that seek to enhance biod­iversity, flora and fauna. The part­ner­ship pro­jects include:

The envir­on­ment­al assess­ment of the NPPP will con­sider in-com­bin­a­tion effects with these projects.

Areas pro­tec­ted for nature conservation

Pro­tec­ted areas rep­res­ent the very best of Scotland’s land­scapes, plants and anim­als, rocks, fossils and land­forms. Their pro­tec­tion and man­age­ment seeks to safe­guard them, both now and for future gen­er­a­tions. With 55 nation­ally and 42 inter­na­tion­ally import­ant areas pro­tec­ted for a nature con­ser­va­tion com­pletely or par­tially with­in the Nation­al Park bound­ary, many of which over­lap with each oth­er, over half of the Nation­al Park is des­ig­nated as one of more areas pro­tec­ted for nature con­ser­va­tion (fig­ure 1). Data from Scot­tish Envir­on­ment­al Web (https://www.environment.gov.scot/data/data- ana­lys­is/­pro­tec­ted-nature-sites/) has been used to provide up to date inform­a­tion on pro­tec­ted areas. It is cor­rect at time of down­load, being 7 Octo­ber 2019, and will be checked for changes as the envir­on­ment­al assess­ment progresses.

Reflect­ing the diversity of nature in the Park, 18 pro­tec­ted areas are des­ig­nated solely for bird features/​interests, I for fresh­wa­ter hab­it­ats, 20 for ter­restri­al plants/​habitats, 7 for geo­lo­gic­al fea­tures (geo­di­versity is con­sidered fur­ther under Top­ic 4, Soils), with the remainder (51) des­ig­nated for a com­bin­a­tion of these and/​or inver­teb­rate and/​or mam­mal features/​interests. Annex II of the scop­ing report provides a table of full details of pro­tec­ted areas, the con­di­tion of features/​interests and the pres­sures affect­ing their condition.

The con­di­tion of the pro­tec­ted areas could be con­sidered a reflec­tion of the wider state of biod­iversity with­in the Park. Since the envir­on­ment­al baseline assess­ment was car­ried out for the cur­rent NPPP in 2015, the num­ber of pro­tec­ted areas in favour­able con­di­tion has increased from 41% to 52% (table 1).

Fig­ure I — SNH map of areas pro­tec­ted for nature conservation

Table I — changes in pro­tec­ted area con­di­tion since 2015

Pro­tec­ted area typeNum­ber com­pletely or par­tially with­in the ParkNum­ber in unfa­vour­able con­di­tionChange in condition
20152019
Site of Spe­cial Scientific5523189% increase in favour­able condition
Interest
Spe­cial Area of Conservation23161026% increase in favour­able condition
Spe­cial Pro­tec­tion Area16986% increase in favour­able condition
Ram­sar site3220% no change

A wide range of pres­sures affect pro­tec­ted areas res­ult­ing in unfa­vour­able con­di­tion, most of which relate to land/​water use and man­age­ment. A sum­mary of the pres­sures is presen­ted in table 2.

Table 2 – sum­mary of pres­sures affect­ing pro­tec­ted area features/​interests

Pres­sureNum­ber of features/​interests affected
Over/​under graz­ing, tramp­ling, oth­er grazing175
Agri­cul­tur­al or forestry operations,47
game/​fisheries management
Burn­ing46
Recre­ation disturbance44
Invas­ive spe­cies, plant pests and diseases43
Water man­age­ment, water quality29
Nat­ur­al event27
Cli­mate change9
No pro-act­ive management7
Pro-act­ive on site man­age­ment, conservation6
activ­it­ies
Extrac­tion5
Devel­op­ment4
Wild­life crime4
Main­ten­ance activities3
Flood defence works2
Air pol­lu­tion1
Dumping/​spreading of material1
Inter-spe­cif­ic competition1

Nation­al Nature Reserves

Nation­al Nature Reserves (NNRs) are nature reserves with nation­ally or inter­na­tion­ally import­ant hab­it­ats and spe­cies, where people are also encour­aged to vis­it. The main aims of man­aging them are to con­serve their import­ant hab­it­ats and spe­cies and to give people the oppor­tun­ity to enjoy and con­nect with nature. Most NNRs have some form of vis­it­or facil­it­ies that are designed to ensure recre­ation­al activ­it­ies do not adversely affect the wild­life and hab­it­at that exists there.

There are 9 act­ively pro­moted NNRs with­in the Nation­al Park. They are man­aged by a range of organ­isa­tions (table 3), sev­er­al of whom are part­ners in the NPPP which provides an oppor­tun­ity to con­trib­ute to address­ing issues iden­ti­fied in the NPPP where these are rel­ev­ant to the man­age­ment aims.

Table 3 — organ­isa­tions man­aging NNRs in the Nation­al Park

NNRMan­aged by
Cor­rie FeeSNH
Glen TanarGlen Tanar Estate
Muir of DinnetSNH
Mar Lodge EstateNation­al Trust for Scotland
Aber­nethySNH and RSPB
Glen­moreScot­tish Forestry
Inveresh­ie and InshriachSNH
Insh MarshesRSPB
Craigel­lach­ieSNH

Cairngorms Nature Action Plan (CNAP) priorities

A num­ber of spe­cies and hab­it­ats import­ant for con­ser­va­tion and tack­ling the effects of cli­mate change have been iden­ti­fied for land­scape scale con­ser­va­tion and pri­or­ity spe­cies man­age­ment with­in the CNAP.

The hab­it­ats and spe­cies iden­ti­fied in the CNAP are lis­ted in table 4, with the CNAP tar­gets for land­scape scale con­ser­va­tion presen­ted in table 5. These give an indic­a­tion of where envir­on­ment­al issues lie and so where the NPPP may be able to con­trib­ute, where appro­pri­ate. (Oth­er hab­it­at types not spe­cified in the CNAP are non­ethe­less import­ant for the spe­cies it iden­ti­fies, so are also included in the envir­on­ment­al baseline.)

Table 4 — hab­it­ats and spe­cies iden­ti­fied for action in the CNAP 20192024, and the hab­it­at type(s) that they are pre­dom­in­antly asso­ci­ated with

Hab­it­atsnat­ive wood­lands (par­tic­u­larly Cale­do­ni­an pine forest sup­port­ing caper­cail­lie), moor­land and peat­lands, fresh­wa­ter and wet­lands (par­tic­u­larly for nat­ur­al flood management)
Mam­malsScot­tish wild­cat (found in wood­land hab­it­at); moun­tain hare (found in upland habitat)
Birdscaper­cail­lie (found in wood­land hab­it­at); cur­lew (found in wet­land and grass­land hab­it­at); golden eagle, per­eg­rine fal­con, (found in upland hab­it­ats); hen har­ri­er (found in upland and grass­land habitats)
Inver­teb­ratesKentish glory, dark bordered beauty, pine hov­er­fly, wood ants, pine­wood mason bee, aspen hov­er­fly, shin­ing guest ant (reli­ant on wood­land hab­it­ats); sca­bi­ous min­ing bee (reli­ant on grass­land hab­it­ats); North­ern sil­ver stiletto fly, North­ern Feb­ru­ary red stone­fly, North­ern dam­sel­fly (reli­ant on water/​wetland habitats)
Mol­luscsfresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sel (found in freshwater)
Trees, shrubs, plantsaspen, woolly wil­low, twin­flower, one-flowered win­ter­green, small cow wheat (found in wood­land hab­it­at); marsh saxi­frage, alpine blue sow thistle, oblong wood­sia (found in upland habitat)
Fungi and lichenwax­caps (fungi, found in grass­land hab­it­at); Alect­or­ia ochro­leuca (lichen, found in upland hab­it­at); Her­telidea botry­ose (lichen, found in wood­land habitat)

Table 5CNAP tar­gets for land­scape scale restoration/​enhancement

TAR­GETS
* 5,000 Ha new wood­land (includ­ing regen­er­a­tion and montane)
* 70% of new wood­land to be nat­ive species
* 750 Ha plant­a­tions on ancient wood­land sites (PAWS) and nat­ive wood­lands under act­ive restoration
* 20 farms in wood­land & grass­land projects
* 5,000 Ha peat­land restoration
* 150 km river and ripari­an restoration
* 50 ponds cre­ated or restored, includ­ing SUDs ponds
* increase in farm­land wader pop­u­la­tions from the exist­ing 2015 baseline

Giv­en the stra­tegic, broad scale nature of the NPPP, it is not felt appro­pri­ate to include baseline data on inver­teb­rates, indi­vidu­al plant spe­cies, fungi or lichen. Instead, the envir­on­ment­al assess­ment will focus on ensur­ing that the NPPP avoids sig­ni­fic­ant neg­at­ive effects on their sup­port­ing habitats.

The fol­low­ing sec­tions there­fore provide baseline inform­a­tion on wood­land, upland (incor­por­at­ing heath­land and peat­land hab­it­ats), low­land, fresh­wa­ter and wet­land hab­it­ats (fig­ure 2), along with wild­cat, moun­tain hare, caper­cail­lie, cur­lew, rap­tors and fresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sel. As wild deer, pests and dis­eases also influ­ence biod­iversity, they are con­sidered as part of the baseline as well.

Fig­ure 2 — EUNIS broad hab­it­at types found in the Park

Wood­land habitats

The wood­lands of the Park are a dis­tinct­ive fea­ture of the land­scape, eco­logy, eco­nomy and cul­tur­al her­it­age. Part of the reas­on for their import­ance and dis­tinct­ive­ness stems from the unusu­ally high pro­por­tion of nat­ive tree spe­cies they con­tain (even com­mer­cial wood­lands are pre­dom­in­antly Scots pine).

In the Cairngorms Nation­al Park, forest and wood­land cov­er is just over 16% (fig­ure 2), while in Scot­land as a whole it is 18%. Nev­er­the­less the Cairngorms forests and wood­lands are dis­pro­por­tion­ately sig­ni­fic­ant for rare flora and fauna. Almost all of the Cale­do­ni­an forest resource of the Nation­al Park is inter­na­tion­ally sig­ni­fic­ant and pro­tec­ted through Spe­cial Areas of Con­ser­va­tion (SAC) designation.

Strath­spey, Strath Avon, Glen­liv­et, Don­side, Deeside and the Angus Glens com­bined con­tain an extens­ive, var­ied and pre­dom­in­antly nat­ive net­work of forest hab­it­ats. This is one of the most valu­able eco­lo­gic­al net­works in Britain.

It is also one of the most widely recog­nised spe­cial qual­it­ies of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. By provid­ing this net­work and sup­port­ing many of the pri­or­ity spe­cies iden­ti­fied in the CNAP, forests and wood­lands make an import­ant con­tri­bu­tion to the wider biod­iversity in the Park.

The Nat­ive Wood­land Sur­vey of Scot­land (https://forestry.gov.scot/forests- envir­on­ment/­biod­iversity/n­at­ive-wood­land­s/n­at­ive-wood­land-sur­vey-of-scot­land-nwss) indic­ates that while the aver­age pro­por­tion of nat­ive wood­land across all Scot­tish loc­al author­ity areas is around 22%, in the Nation­al Park the fig­ure is 79%, mak­ing it the only area in Scot­land where nat­ive wood­lands form the major­ity of the wood­land resource. As part of this, the Park con­tains the most extens­ive tracts of Cale­do­ni­an forest in Bri­tain, as well as some of the best examples in Scot­land of bog wood­land, mont­ane wil­low scrub and stands of aspen. The pro­por­tions of the dif­fer­ent types of tree cov­er in the Park are shown in table 6.

Table 6 — Nation­al Forest Invent­ory 2015, pro­vi­sion­al estim­ates of forest cov­er in the Park (https://​www​.forestresearch​.gov​.uk/​t​o​o​l​s​-​a​n​d​-​r​e​s​o​u​r​c​e​s​/​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​-​f​o​r​e​s​t​-​i​n​v​e​n​tory/)

Total area (ha)Total area (%)
Scots pine36,90060%
Sitka spruce5,6009%
Lodge­pole pine3,0005%
Larches2,6004%
Oth­er conifers1,6003%
All con­ifers49,80081%
Birch10,20016%
Oth­er broadleaves1,9003%
All broadleaves12,10019%
All spe­cies62,300100%

Around 340 square km of the Nation­al Park’s wood­lands are iden­ti­fied as being ancient accord­ing to the Ancient Wood­land Invent­ory (https://www.nature.scot/professional- advice/­land-and-sea-man­age­ment/­man­aging-land/­forests-and-wood­land­s/his­tory-scot­lands- wood­lands). Although not defin­it­ive due to his­tor­ic­al map­ping issues, the Ancient Wood­land Invent­ory provides an indic­a­tion of where ancient wood­lands can be found in the Park (fig­ure 3).

Ancient wood­land is defined as land that is cur­rently wooded and has been con­tinu­ally wooded, at least since 1750. Around 160 square km of ancient wood­lands have been iden­ti­fied as being semi-nat­ur­al. Ancient wood­land is of import­ance for biod­iversity, due to its antiquity and lack of sig­ni­fic­ant dis­turb­ance to the soil struc­ture. Once des­troyed, it can­not be recreated.

Fig­ure 3 – Ancient Wood­land Invent­ory wood­lands in the Park

Over the last 25 years there has been an increased aware­ness of the mul­tiple bene­fits that nat­ive wood­land can deliv­er and action to restore and expand nat­ive woods. Between 2013 and 2015, 890 ha of new nat­ive wood­land was cre­ated in the Park. Of the newly cre­ated wood­land, around 704ha is adja­cent to the exist­ing resource, enhan­cing biod­iversity (and oth­er) value. How­ever, lack of regen­er­a­tion, poor struc­tur­al diversity and graz­ing pres­sure has res­ul­ted in some wood­lands suf­fer­ing from reduced biod­iversity value.

Improved con­nectiv­ity through wood­land expan­sion com­bined with good man­age­ment is cru­cial to enhance hab­it­at that sup­ports spe­cies of high con­ser­va­tion value. The Cairngorms Forest Strategy 2018 (https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​w​o​r​king- togeth­er­/au­thor­ity/n­a­tion­al-park-strategies/­forest-strategy/) iden­ti­fies sig­ni­fic­ant poten­tial for wood­land expan­sion in the Nation­al Park. The Strategy seeks to guide expan­sion to appro­pri­ate loc­a­tions that com­ple­ment oth­er land uses and eco­lo­gic­al requirements.

Upland hab­it­ats

The Cairngorms are con­sidered to be one of the most spec­tac­u­lar moun­tain areas in Bri­tain and sup­port a rich arc­tic mont­ane flora, includ­ing upland heath­land, peat­land and mont­ane scrub hab­it­ats (fig­ure 2):

  • Upland heath­land hab­it­at is dom­in­ated by stands of dwarf shrubs with a sparse mix­ture of oth­er spe­cies such as grasses, sedges and herbs. The hab­it­at is wide­spread and tends to be found on land that was pre­vi­ously wood­land. In the Cairngorms, it is the most extens­ive hab­it­at. This is mainly due to human activ­it­ies such as drain­age (for grouse and red deer hunt­ing), and/​or due to felling, burn­ing and graz­ing, which pre­vents nat­ur­al tree regeneration.
  • Blanket bog is the second most extens­ive hab­it­at. Over time blanket bog form peat soils, which are import­ant car­bon stores. How­ever they are sus­cept­ible to erosion from human activ­ity (such as tracks and ATV use) and tramp­ling by deer.
  • Mont­ane scrub is found above the nat­ur­al tree line. Dwarf wil­lows, birches and juni­per grow in a low twis­ted, wind-pruned form togeth­er with a vari­ety of flower­ing plants, fungi and lichen. The best example is at Cre­ag Fhi­alach above Inshriach, where a com­plex of juni­per and birch scrub grows at 550- 650m. High alti­tude birches, wil­lows and juni­pers would have been more com­mon in the past. Cen­tur­ies of burn­ing and heavy graz­ing by live­stock and deer have taken their toll on trees and shrubs. These pres­sures con­tin­ue today.

Low­land habitats

The low­land farm­land and grass­land with­in the Park (fig­ure 2) has been tra­di­tion­ally man­aged less intens­ively than the rest of the UK. There are small frag­men­ted areas of low­land and upland hay mead­ows that are loc­ally import­ant for biod­iversity (includ­ing wax­cap fungi). Changes in land use and agri­cul­tur­al prac­tices can present a threat to these habitats.

Fresh­wa­ter and wet­land habitats

Many of the rivers and lochs with­in the Park are inter­na­tion­ally recog­nised as areas pro­tec­ted for nature con­ser­va­tion for the spe­cies they host, such as Atlantic sal­mon and fresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sel, as well as the ripari­an hab­it­ats and vari­ety of spe­cies they sup­port. The Park con­tains part of eight river catch­ments, although two have only a very small por­tion with­in the Park (fig­ure 4). The largest catch­ment is for the River Spey.

Fig­ure 4 — river catch­ments in the Park

The latest data avail­able from SEPA provides inform­a­tion on the eco­lo­gic­al status of the 154 water­bod­ies ana­lysed by SEPA in the Park. This shows that, since the envir­on­ment­al baseline assess­ment was car­ried out for the cur­rent NPPP in 2015, the num­ber of water­bod­ies in high, good or mod­er­ate eco­lo­gic­al status has increased by around 8% while the num­ber in bad or poor status has increased by 1.3% (table 7).

Table 7 — water­body status fig­ures for water­bod­ies in the Park

Status2015, num­ber of water­bod­ies2017, num­ber of water­bod­iesPer­cent­age change
High1312-0.65%
Good80874.55%
Mod­er­ate26323.90%
Poor1816-1.30%
Bad262.60%

A vari­ety of pres­sures are affect­ing water­bod­ies with­in the Park. River basin man­age­ment plans seek to set meas­ures to address pres­sures. The main river catch­ments with­in the Park with catch­ment man­age­ment plans are for the Spey and the Dee:

Along­side many of the water­courses and lochs with­in the Park are wet­land hab­it­ats. A mosa­ic of wet­land hab­it­ats with fens, bogs, woods, wet grass­land and open water provides a home to a rich array of wild­life (fig­ure 5).

Wet­lands would have once been an extens­ive hab­it­at with­in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park, but like wet­lands across the UK, have suffered declines – RSPB report that wet­lands have declined by 90% in the UK since Roman times (http://​ww2​.rspb​.org​.uk/​o​u​r​-​w​o​r​k​/​rspb- news­/news­/283477-wet­land-loss-threatens-wild­life-and-people-). Pol­lu­tion, changes in land use and drain­age affect both fresh­wa­ter and wet­land habitats.

In the Nation­al Park, the most extens­ive wet­land hab­it­ats are found around Insh Marshes between Kin­gussie and Kin­craig. The marshes are inter­na­tion­ally import­ant for wet wood­land and fen hab­it­ats as well as the birds, fish, plants and inver­teb­rates that they sup­port. The marshes also func­tion as an import­ant flood plain.

Fig­ure 5 — lochs, rivers and wet­land hab­it­ats with­in the Park

Wet grass­lands also occur in the Park. They are often found in agri­cul­tur­al land, in low-lying areas of fields where crop yield and pro­ductiv­ity is low. They are non­ethe­less import­ant for inver­teb­rates that provide a food source for wad­ing birds, such as curlew.

Scot­tish wildcat

Scot­tish Nat­ur­al Her­it­age (2017, https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2017- 07/A1697327%20-%20The%20Cairngorms%20Wildcat%20Project%20- %20final%20report.pdf) con­sider that the cur­rent range for wild­cat con­sists of areas in main­land Scot­land north of the High­land Bound­ary Fault. Know­ledge about pop­u­la­tion fig­ures is patchy, partly due to the elu­sive beha­viour of wild­cat and also because of inter­breed­ing with domestic/​feral cats res­ult­ing in hybrids that can be dif­fi­cult to tell apart from pure bred wild­cat. Cam­era trap sur­veys from 2010 to 2013 estim­ated a pop­u­la­tion of 115 to 314 individuals.

Scot­tish wild­cats prefer to live on the wood­land edge, in the mar­gins of moun­tains and moor­lands, with rough graz­ing. They gen­er­ally avoid high moun­tain areas, exposed coasts and intens­ively farmed low­lands. The main threat to Scot­tish wild­cats is genet­ic extinc­tion due to hybrid­isa­tion with fer­al cats, domest­ic cats and exist­ing hybrids.

Oth­er factors affect­ing wild­cat include incid­ent­al harm from pred­at­or con­trol activ­it­ies, feline dis­ease, road col­li­sions and frag­ment­a­tion or dis­turb­ance to hab­it­ats through devel­op­ment or changes in land management.

One area wholly with­in and one par­tially with­in the Park have been iden­ti­fied as pri­or­ity areas (fig­ure 6) for Scot­tish Wild­cat Action, where wild­cat have been recor­ded along with suit­able hab­it­at. Safe­guard­ing this con­trib­utes to efforts to save the spe­cies from extinc­tion in the wild.

Fig­ure 6 — wild­cat pri­or­ity areas in the Park

Moun­tain hare

The moun­tain hare are nat­ive to the High­lands, where they are found on heath­er moor­land man­aged for grouse and mont­ane uplands. Although some stud­ies have found sig­ni­fic­ant declines, pop­u­la­tion data is incon­clus­ive. This is in part because stand­ard­ised meth­od­o­lo­gies for pop­u­la­tion counts have only recently being pub­lished (SNH, 2018 https://www.nature.scot/snh-research-report-1022-developing-counting-methodology- mountain-hares-lepus-timidus-scotland).

How­ever the factors affect­ing moun­tain hare num­bers are bet­ter known. They include hab­it­at damage/​loss, leg­al hunt­ing and cull­ing, and cli­mate change caus­ing a shift in dis­tri­bu­tion of brown hare bring­ing them into com­pet­i­tion with moun­tain hare. Being prey spe­cies, moun­tain hare are import­ant for biod­iversity, for example for wilcat and raptors.

Caper­cail­lie

Caper­cail­lie pop­u­la­tions in Scot­land have declined sig­ni­fic­antly from an estim­ated 20,000 birds in 1970 to 1,114 at the nation­al winter sur­vey in 201516. The Park holds a sig­ni­fic­ant pro­por­tion of the nation­al pop­u­la­tion – around 80%, the major­ity in Strath­spey — mostly in areas pro­tec­ted for nature con­ser­va­tion but also in oth­er forests that host meta­pop­u­la­tions. Caper­cail­lie also per­sist in Deeside (as well as sev­er­al areas out­with the Park), but this pop­u­la­tion (and the oth­ers in Scot­land) is more frag­men­ted, num­bers are lower and breed­ing suc­cess poorer. The Strath­spey caper­cail­lie pop­u­la­tion is cru­cial to the long-term sur­viv­al of the spe­cies in the UK.

In addi­tion to being a spe­cies iden­ti­fied for action in the CNAP, caper­cail­lie are the focus of the Cairngorms Caper­cail­lie Pro­ject (https://www.cairngormscapercaillie.scot/), which is deliv­er­ing the recom­mend­a­tions of the Caper­cail­lie Frame­work. (The Frame­work pulled togeth­er all the inform­a­tion relat­ing to caper­cail­lie dis­tri­bu­tion, the pres­sures they face and man­age­ment meas­ures.) Key recom­mend­a­tions to improve con­ser­va­tion for caper­cail­lie include the intro­duc­tion of land­scape scale meas­ures to tar­get the main causes of dis­turb­ance, pred­a­tion, col­li­sion with deer fences, unsym­path­et­ic wood­land man­age­ment, hab­it­at loss and fragmentation.

Cur­lew

The Nation­al Park is one of the most import­ant UK main­land sites for breed­ing wad­ing birds due to its com­bin­a­tion of wet­lands, wet grass­lands and low-intens­ity mixed farm­ing. Nev­er­the­less, cur­lew have seen their num­bers dra­mat­ic­ally reduce by over 62% between 1994 and 2017 (SNH, 2018 https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2018- 11/Official%20Statistics%20-%20Terrestrial%20Breeding%20Birds%202018.pdf).

The Strath­spey Wet­lands and Waders Ini­ti­at­ive (SWWI) was set up to work with farm­ers and oth­er landown­ers to safe­guard wet­land hab­it­ats and the future of the nation­ally import­ant wader pop­u­la­tion in Badenoch and Strath­spey — the largest of its kind in main­land Bri­tain. It seeks to sup­port farm­ers in deliv­er­ing land man­age­ment based con­ser­va­tion pro­jects on agri­cul­tur­al land in Strath­spey for the bene­fit of waders on a land­scape con­ser­va­tion scale. This should bene­fit curlew.

The River Spey Catch­ment Man­age­ment Plan 2016 includes object­ives and actions to enhance ripari­an and wet­land hab­it­ats that should also bene­fit curlew.

CNAP rap­tors: golden eagle, per­eg­rine fal­con and hen harrier

The most recently pub­lished report into wild­life crime in Scot­land (Scot­tish Government,

  1. https://www.gov.scot/publications/wildlife-crime-scotland-annual-report- 2017/pages/6/#Sect4.7) included pop­u­la­tion inform­a­tion on the three rap­tor spe­cies iden­ti­fied as pri­or­it­ies in the CNAP. The report does not break down fig­ures to region­al level, but provides a nation­al over­view with some region­al commentary:
  • For golden eagle, the most recent nation­al sur­vey was done in 2015 and found 508 ter­rit­ori­al pairs. Of rel­ev­ance to the Nation­al Park, eagles were found across the High­lands and Islands, primar­ily in upland hab­it­ats. The pop­u­la­tion had increased since the pre­vi­ous 2003 sur­vey, how­ever there was little change in cent­ral and east­ern parts of the High­lands. Factors affect­ing the nation­al pop­u­la­tion were iden­ti­fied as col­li­sions with power­lines, winter star­va­tion, dis­ease, long term changes in land man­age­ment (increased affor­est­a­tion and intens­ive graz­ing) and illeg­al persecution.
  • For hen har­ri­er, the pop­u­la­tion in 2016 was estim­ated at 460 pairs, spread across Scot­land. The breed­ing pop­u­la­tion was con­cen­trated in Orkney, some west coast islands and Argyll main­land, but scarcer else­where. The pop­u­la­tion had decreased since the pre­vi­ous sur­vey in 2010, with declines iden­ti­fied in the cent­ral and east­ern High­lands. Factors affect­ing the nation­al pop­u­la­tion were iden­ti­fied as winter star­va­tion and dis­ease, land use changes degrad­ing hab­it­at, pred­a­tion by fox and illeg­al persecution.
  • For per­eg­rine fal­con, the 2014 sur­vey estim­ated there to be 516 – 538 pairs, spread across Scot­land. Of rel­ev­ance to the Nation­al Park, the spe­cies was found to be rare or scarce in parts of the north and west High­lands. The pop­u­la­tion had decreased since the pre­vi­ous 2002 sur­vey, with the north and some upland areas. Factors affect­ing the nation­al pop­u­la­tion were iden­ti­fied as col­li­sions with power lines, winter star­va­tion, dis­ease, changes in prey avail­ab­il­ity, accu­mu­la­tion of con­tam­in­ants from con­sump­tion of seabirds, poten­tial inter­ac­tions with increas­ing golden eagle pop­u­la­tions and illeg­al persecution.

Fresh­wa­ter pearl mussel

Fresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sel are long-lived and have an unusu­al life cycle, with the ini­tial stages reli­ant on fix­ing to the gills of sal­monids, before detach­ing to become sedent­ary on the river bed. Because of this, they are par­tic­u­larly sus­cept­ible to changes in water qual­ity and quant­ity, hab­it­at damage/​loss, as well as changes in their host spe­cies population.

Scot­land rep­res­ents a strong­hold for fresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sels in Europe. How­ever, pop­u­la­tions in Scot­land are in ser­i­ous decline. In 2015 a nation­al sur­vey found mus­sels in 115 water­courses, the major­ity being in the High­lands and West­ern Isles. Only 71 of these showed suc­cess­ful recruit­ment (breed­ing and set­tling of juven­ile mus­sels in the river bed). In the remainder, only adult mus­sels were found.

Lack of recruit­ment is of con­cern, as pop­u­la­tions will go extinct — since the pre­vi­ous nation­al sur­vey in 1999, fresh­wa­ter pearl mus­sels became extinct in || rivers. Factors affect­ing the sur­viv­al of fresh water pearl mus­sel include illeg­al pearl fish­ing, water pol­lu­tion and hab­it­at damage/​loss (nat­ur­al and man-made).

Oth­er issues affect­ing biod­iversity — deer

There are five spe­cies of deer found with­in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. Their dis­tri­bu­tion is strongly influ­enced by human activ­ity and land management:

  • Red deer, a nat­ive spe­cies, have long been cent­ral to the cul­tur­al and nat­ur­al her­it­age of the High­lands. They are com­mon in most upland areas of the Park, although they can also be found in wood­lands. Red deer influ­ence hab­it­ats through graz­ing, for example by provid­ing a source of dung and car­ri­on that bene­fits oth­er spe­cies, and cre­at­ing areas for seed­lings to take hold. How­ever too much graz­ing and tramp­ling by red deer can have neg­at­ive impacts on import­ant hab­it­ats and asso­ci­ated spe­cies. Upland hab­it­ats are par­tic­u­larly sens­it­ive to over-graz­ing and tramp­ling, which can lead to erosion.
  • Roe deer, anoth­er nat­ive spe­cies, are also numer­ous in the Park. They are more com­monly seen on lower ground in and around wood­lands. They can cause dam­age to young trees and crops.
  • Sika deer, a non-nat­ive spe­cies, are present in much smal­ler num­bers. Pop­u­la­tions of sika are found in the Mon­adh­liath moun­tain range, with indi­vidu­als also some­times seen in oth­er areas with­in the Park. Sika deer are able to mate with red deer, pro­du­cing fer­tile hybrid off­spring. This threatens the genet­ic dis­tinct­ive­ness of the red deer, so is of concern.
  • Reindeer are found in the Park, mainly in the upland areas around Cairngorm and Crom­dale hills. Once a nat­ive spe­cies, they were re-intro­duced in 1952, and form a unique semi-domest­ic herd man­aged by the Cairngorm Reindeer Centre. They are import­ant mainly as a tour­ist attrac­tion. Their num­bers are con­trolled through select­ive breed­ing. In order to ensure effects of graz­ing by reindeer on fra­gile upland hab­it­ats is man­aged at a sus­tain­able level, a research pro­ject is cur­rently under­way (https://​www​.inverness​.uhi​.ac​.uk/​n​e​w​s​/​c​a​i​r​n​g​o​r​m​-​r​e​i​n​d​e​e​r​-​r​e​s​e​a​r​c​h​-​p​r​o​g​r​a​m​m​e​-​e​n​ters- its-next-phase.html). In part­ner­ship with Cairngorm Reindeer Herd, the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity, the Roy­al Botan­ic Garden Edin­burgh, High­lands and Islands Enter­prise, the Roy­al Soci­ety for the Pro­tec­tion of Birds, Scot­tish Nat­ur­al Her­it­age and Scot­tish Forestry, Inverness Col­lege UHI is lead­ing on the Cairngorms Reindeer Research Pro­gramme. One aspect of the research is invest­ig­at­ing the eco­lo­gic­al role reindeer play in the Cairngorms, focus­sing on their move­ments, beha­viour and diet.
  • Fal­low deer were intro­duced to Bri­tain in the 11th cen­tury. There is a small pop­u­la­tion in the south­ern sec­tion of the Park in Perthshire.

Deer num­bers need to be man­aged to min­im­ise neg­at­ive effects on hab­it­ats, as well as to ensure there is suf­fi­cient food and shel­ter to main­tain the health and wel­fare of the deer.

Vol­un­tary deer man­age­ment groups bring togeth­er those man­aging the land, seek­ing to cre­ate a coordin­ated approach to man­aging deer num­bers for con­ser­va­tion and eco­nom­ic interests across dif­fer­ent land hold­ings. There are five deer man­age­ment groups either par­tially or wholly with­in the Park (fig­ure 7).

Fig­ure 7- deer man­age­ment group bound­ar­ies (bound­ar­ies from SNH)

How­ever as deer are mobile spe­cies, work with neigh­bour­ing deer man­age­ment groups is also import­ant. The Cairngorms Deer Advis­ory Group provides a means of con­tact and com­mu­nic­a­tion between mem­bers from deer man­age­ment groups and oth­er parties involved in land man­age­ment with­in and neigh­bour­ing the Park, to pro­mote sus­tain­able deer man­age­ment with­in the Park.

Oth­er issues affect­ing biod­iversity –dis­eases, non-nat­ive species

Non-nat­ive spe­cies can kill, har­bour dis­ease, and/​or com­pete with nat­ive spe­cies. A num­ber have been recor­ded in the Park.

These include the plants Japan­ese knot­weed (Fal­lopia japon­ica), giant hog­weed (Her­acle

×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!