Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

Policy 4: Natural Heritage Supplementary Guidance

PLAN­NING

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan POLICY 4 — NAT­UR­AL HER­IT­AGE Sup­ple­ment­ary Guidance

Cairngorms NATION­AL PARK Pàirc Nàiseanta a’ Mhon­aidh Ruaidh

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance Policy 4 – Nat­ur­al Heritage

This Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance provides fur­ther inform­a­tion and detail on how to com­ply with Policy 4 – Nat­ur­al Her­it­age in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2015. It forms part of the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan and car­ries that weight in decision mak­ing. This Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance should be read along­side the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan policy.

This doc­u­ment is avail­able in large print on request. Please con­tact the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity on 01479 873535. It is also avail­able to view at www​.cairngorms​.co​.uk

Pub­lished by Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity 14 The Square Grant­own-on-Spey PH26 3HG

Email: planning@​cairngorms.​co.​uk Tel: 01479 873535 Fax: 01479 873527

www​.cairngorms​.co​.uk

© CNPA 2015. All rights reserved.

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Her­it­age Sup­ple­ment­ary Guidance

Policy Require­mentsInform­a­tion Required
Prin­ciple I Ensure no net loss of nat­ur­al her­it­age value• A descrip­tion of the nat­ur­al her­it­age on the site and pos­sibly the sur­round­ing area, includ­ing its sig­ni­fic­ance and value • A sur­vey which con­siders as a min­im­um: Site des­ig­na­tions Pro­tec­ted spe­cies / hab­it­ats Oth­er pri­or­ity spe­cies / hab­it­ats Land­forms and geo­di­versity Soils and soil car­bon Con­nectiv­ity of hab­it­at and frag­ment­a­tion Invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies Bio secur­ity • An assess­ment of any effect the pro­posed devel­op­ment will have on the nat­ur­al her­it­age • If adverse effects are found with­in this assess­ment, details of mit­ig­a­tion or com­pens­a­tion meas­ures to avoid or min­im­ise these effects, includ­ing man­age­ment and main­ten­ance inform­a­tion • An assess­ment of any resid­ual effects
Prin­ciple 2 Enhance exist­ing nat­ur­al her­it­age value• Identi­fy any oppor­tun­it­ies to enhance the nat­ur­al her­it­age of the devel­op­ment site
Prin­ciple 3 Man­age and main­tain nat­ur­al her­it­age value• A mon­it­or­ing and main­ten­ance programme
Inter­na­tion­al and Nation­al Designations• Sup­ply suf­fi­cient inform­a­tion to allow the plan­ning author­ity to carry out a Hab­it­ats Reg­u­la­tion Apprais­al for any qual­i­fy­ing interests includ­ing: • where rel­ev­ant, cri­ter­ia set­ting out neces­sary mit­ig­a­tion asso­ci­ated with recre­ation­al dis­turb­ance to caper­cail­lie caused as a res­ult of your devel­op­ment; • where rel­ev­ant, cri­ter­ia regard­ing neces­sary mit­ig­a­tion asso­ci­ated with water flow and qual­ity and the impact of devel­op­ment on otters.

3

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

  1. All plan­ning applic­a­tions are assessed against the impacts that the pro­posed devel­op­ment will poten­tially have on the nat­ur­al, cul­tur­al and earth her­it­age resources of the Nation­al Park. You will there­fore need to con­sider the impact of your pro­posed devel­op­ment on the nat­ur­al her­it­age as an integ­ral part of your design and plan­ning pro­cesses. Your plan­ning applic­a­tion should include inform­a­tion on how your devel­op­ment pro­pos­al has been designed to accord with the three nat­ur­al her­it­age prin­ciples set out below. How to meet the require­ments of the policy
  2. Plan­ning applic­a­tion will be assessed using the three prin­ciples set out in the fol­low­ing check­list which must be addressed in turn. You should provide evid­ence of how your pro­pos­al meets all three prin­ciples. If you can­not achieve any of the three steps for Prin­ciple I your devel­op­ment pro­pos­al will not be con­sidered appro­pri­ate. The sequence by which this hier­archy will be applied is shown in Fig­ure 1 (p6). All decisions will be informed by the Cairngorms Nature Action Plan (2013). Prin­ciple I — ENSURE NO NET LOSS
  3. There is a pre­sump­tion that all devel­op­ment should meet Prin­ciple 1. It com­prises a hier­archy of three steps on which you should base your decisions regard­ing devel­op­ment design and site lay­out con­sid­er­a­tions. All devel­op­ment should meet the terms of Step 1. Only where evid­ence con­firms this is not pos­sible should you con­sider try­ing to achieve the require­ments set out in Step 2. If this is not pos­sible evid­ence must be provided to explain why it is neces­sary to use Step 3.
  4. Step I Pro­tect Devel­op­ment should res­ult in no net loss of the nat­ur­al her­it­age interest of the Nation­al Park, This includes nat­ur­al her­it­age interests that may be out­side the bound­ar­ies of the devel­op­ment site. Your devel­op­ment pro­pos­al should there­fore be designed to pro­tect exist­ing nat­ur­al her­it­age fea­tures with­in the devel­op­ment site and its surroundings.
  5. Clear jus­ti­fic­a­tion as to why any devel­op­ment can­not meet Step I of the first prin­ciple will be required. Without such jus­ti­fic­a­tion a pro­pos­al will be recom­men­ded for refus­al. The valid­ity of such jus­ti­fic­a­tions will be assessed in line with all cur­rent policies. Step 2 — Min­im­ise and mitigate
  6. In any situ­ation where loss of, or dam­age to, nat­ur­al her­it­age interest is unavoid­able from a pro­posed devel­op­ment then the loss or dam­age must be min­im­ised as far as pos­sible through appro­pri­ate design. Where loss of or dam­age to the nat­ur­al her­it­age is still unavoid­able then this loss must be fully mit­ig­ated on the devel­op­ment site. Step 3 — Compensate
  7. If full mit­ig­a­tion is not pos­sible on-site then it must be achieved using off-site compensation.
  8. Com­pens­a­tion must be appro­pri­ate and pro­por­tion­ate to off­set the likely impacts of a devel­op­ment pro­pos­al on a spe­cif­ic hab­it­at. Com­pens­a­tion meas­ures must reflect the qual­ity, amount and type of the hab­it­at being com­pensated for and the length of time it will take to re-instate a hab­it­at of equal value on an altern­at­ive site. This is likely to require a lar­ger area to off­set the loss over time. All pro­pos­als requir­ing com­pens­a­tion will be assessed on a case by case basis.

4

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Prin­ciple 2ENHANCE

  1. You must then assess and deliv­er the poten­tial to enhance the nat­ur­al her­it­age as an integ­ral ele­ment of the design of your devel­op­ment proposal.
  2. Many hab­it­ats and spe­cies with­in the Nation­al Park whilst not bene­fit­ing from pro­tec­tion through a des­ig­na­tion are import­ant to the over­all biod­iversity and eco­sys­tems of the Nation­al Park. The enhance­ment and res­tor­a­tion of such hab­it­ats, hab­it­at net­works and spe­cies is encour­aged in line with the first aim of the Nation­al Park to con­serve and enhance the nat­ur­al and cul­tur­al her­it­age of the area.
  3. As well as provid­ing import­ant nat­ur­al her­it­age bene­fits, this approach will often also con­trib­ute towards a high qual­ity, and aes­thet­ic­ally pleas­ing devel­op­ment. You must there­fore demon­strate how you have sought to con­serve and enhance the exist­ing nat­ur­al her­it­age value of the devel­op­ment site and its con­nec­tions with its wider sur­round­ings. Prin­ciple 3MANAGE
  4. Essen­tial to the suc­cess of any mit­ig­a­tion, com­pens­a­tion, or enhance­ment scheme is routine man­age­ment and main­ten­ance. An agreed mon­it­or­ing and / or main­ten­ance pro­gramme will need to be put in place. This must include mon­it­or­ing to identi­fy wheth­er the pro­posed scheme has been suc­cess­ful and mech­an­isms whereby should it be shown that the scheme is not suc­cess­ful that appro­pri­ate action will be taken in a timely man­ner to rec­ti­fy the situ­ation. Pre­cau­tion­ary principle
  5. In line with the first aim of the Nation­al Park, a pre­cau­tion­ary approach to the assess­ment of impacts upon a site will be applied. Where there are gaps in know­ledge or uncer­tainty about mit­ig­a­tion or com­pens­a­tion pro­pos­als then addi­tion­al inform­a­tion may be reques­ted. Where uncer­tainty remains, the pre­cau­tion­ary prin­ciple will be applied and plan­ning per­mis­sion will not be granted.
  6. The level of inform­a­tion required will depend on the sig­ni­fic­ance of the pro­pos­al. For example, in some instances a pro­fes­sion­al sur­vey may be required. For European pro­tec­ted spe­cies, sur­veys must be sub­mit­ted along with applic­a­tions for plan­ning per­mis­sion in prin­ciple, as well as full plan­ning per­mis­sion. It is strongly advised that oth­er required sur­veys are sub­mit­ted with the applic­a­tion in order to avoid delays in the determ­in­a­tion process.

5

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Is there loss of or dam­age to nat­ur­al her­it­age as a result?

Yes Has loss been min­im­ised? Yes Can remain­ing loss be mit­ig­ated on-site? No Redesign devel­op­ment pro­pos­al No Nor­mal design con­sid­er­a­tions apply

Not pos­sible Is com­pens­a­tion at an off-site loc­a­tion pos­sible? Par­tially pos­sible Scope of on-site mit­ig­a­tion and off-site com­pens­a­tion assessed and agreed with the plan­ning author­ity Fully pos­sible Mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als assessed and agreed with the plan­ning authority

Yes Level of off-site com­pens­a­tion assessed and agreed with the plan­ning author­ity Level of off-site com­pens­a­tion assessed by and agreed with the plan­ning authority

No The pro­pos­al is unlikely to be accept­able. Com­pens­a­tion pos­sible Level of off-site com­pens­a­tion assessed by and agreed with the plan­ning author­ity Com­pens­a­tion not pos­sible The pro­pos­al is unlikely to be acceptable.

Fig­ure 1: Prin­ciple I — Hier­archy of steps to be applied

6

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

How to com­pile the required sur­vey evidence

  1. You are required to sub­mit evid­ence with your plan­ning applic­a­tion which demon­strates that you have iden­ti­fied the hab­it­ats and spe­cies on and adja­cent to the devel­op­ment site and have assessed the effects of the pro­posed devel­op­ment on the nat­ur­al her­it­age. In order to do this and when pre­par­ing a plan­ning sub­mis­sion, you may fol­low the fol­low­ing approach to ensure you com­ply with this require­ment. Step 1: Sur­vey and assess impacts
  2. Con­duct­ing an ini­tial site audit will help you to determ­ine the scope of any form­al sur­veys and assess­ments that will be required to describe the nat­ur­al her­it­age on the site and sur­round­ing area, includ­ing its sig­ni­fic­ance and value.
  3. You should look at exist­ing sources of inform­a­tion in the first instance, for example – his­tor­ic records held by region­al record centres. Oth­ers include: (SNHi) www​.snh​.org​.uk/snhi and www​.nes​brec​.org​.uk.
  4. Ensur­ing that the sur­vey for a par­tic­u­lar spe­cies is car­ried out at the right time of year is cru­cial to ensur­ing that appro­pri­ate inform­a­tion can be col­lec­ted. Table I (p12) shows the best time of year to carry out sur­veys for import­ant spe­cies in the Nation­al Park, These must be com­pleted at the times of year shown.
  5. It is recom­mend that bio­lo­gic­al and eco­lo­gic­al sur­veys are car­ried out by mem­bers of the Chartered Insti­tute of Eco­logy and Envir­on­ment­al Man­age­ment (CIEEM) and Chartered Envir­on­ment­al­ists. Sur­veys for oth­er nat­ur­al her­it­age interests, such as geo­logy, geo­mor­pho­logy and soils, must also be under­taken by a suit­ably qual­i­fied and / or exper­i­enced per­son. Sur­veys should be car­ried out accord­ing to cur­rent best prac­tice for the hab­it­ats or spe­cies being sur­veyed. For some spe­cies a licence will be required from Scot­tish Nat­ur­al Her­it­age (SNH). A CIEEM accred­ited sur­vey­or will be able to advise you on this. For more details, please see: www​.snh​.gov​.uk.
  6. It is expec­ted that sur­veys for vari­ous spe­cies and hab­it­ats may be required over a num­ber of sea­sons, and pos­sibly up to one year before applic­a­tions can be con­sidered, for example to reflect the life­cycle of fish. There­fore it is strongly recom­men­ded that sur­veys required are agreed with us in advance of car­ry­ing them out. This will help you to ensure that you are able to provide the neces­sary nat­ur­al her­it­age inform­a­tion with the min­im­um of sur­vey work. It will also elim­in­ate or lim­it the need for more sur­vey­ing at a later stage and con­sequently reduce time taken in determ­in­ing the applic­a­tion. In cer­tain cir­cum­stances, for example where there has been a time lag since plan­ning con­sent was gran­ted, resur­vey­ing pri­or to com­mence­ment of works may be required.
  7. Site sur­veys should con­sider the fol­low­ing eight issues as a minimum:

7

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

  1. Site des­ig­na­tions
  2. There are a num­ber of des­ig­nated sites in the Nation­al Park that carry UK and European nat­ur­al her­it­age des­ig­na­tions. SNH hold up to date inform­a­tion on the bound­ar­ies of these des­ig­nated areas — www​.snh​.org​.uk/snhi.
  3. Inform­a­tion and assess­ments for des­ig­nated sites, or devel­op­ments close to one, must pay par­tic­u­lar atten­tion to noti­fied and qual­i­fy­ing interests of their des­ig­na­tion. Oth­er nat­ur­al her­it­age interests also need to be con­sidered. Good inform­a­tion is essen­tial to assess the devel­op­ment. This inform­a­tion must be sub­mit­ted when you lodge your application.
  4. Pro­tec­ted species
  5. UK and European legis­la­tion pro­tects a num­ber of spe­cies found in the Nation­al Park. The pres­ence of these spe­cies will affect the level of inform­a­tion required, how the applic­a­tion is con­sidered and the cri­ter­ia by which decisions are made.
  6. Where a European Pro­tec­ted Spe­cies is present on or adja­cent to the site, the plan­ning author­ity will require a Spe­cies Pro­tec­tion Plan (SPP) that con­tains sur­vey inform­a­tion and details of mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures before it is able to make a decision. European Pro­tec­ted Spe­cies (EPS) found in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park are: • bats — nathusi­us, sop­rano and com­mon pip­istrelle, Daubenton’s, Natterer’s and brown long-eared • Scot­tish wild­cat • great cres­ted newt • otter • yel­low marsh saxifrage
  7. In addi­tion to European Pro­tec­ted Spe­cies, devel­op­ment must avoid adverse impacts upon spe­cies lis­ted in: • Sched­ules 1,5 and 8 of the Wild­life and Coun­tryside Act 1981 as amended; • Annexes II and V of the EC Hab­it­ats dir­ect­ive; • Annex I of EC Birds Dir­ect­ive; • Pro­tec­tion of Badgers Act 1993 as amended; and • Con­ser­va­tion (Nat­ur­al Hab­it­ats, & c.)
  8. A spe­cies licence may be obtained from SNH to per­mit activ­it­ies that may affect pro­tec­ted spe­cies. Inform­a­tion about this can be found in the plan­ning advice note at www​.cairngorms​.co​.uk and www​.snh​.gov​.uk.
  9. Oth­er pri­or­ity hab­it­ats and species
  10. With­in the Nation­al Park there are a range of hab­it­ats and spe­cies that are nation­ally and / or loc­ally import­ant, but that are neither European Pro­tec­ted Spe­cies nor noti­fied fea­tures of des­ig­nated sites. These pri­or­ity hab­it­ats and spe­cies will be giv­en great­er weight by the plan­ning author­ity when determ­in­ing an applic­a­tion. Examples include nat­ive pine forest, mixed birch and aspen wood­land, juni­per wood­land, oak/​hazel wood­land, low­land heath, low­land spe­cies, rich grass­land both ripari­an and oth­er­wise, ground­wa­ter depend­ent wet­lands, red squir­rel, lap­wing oyster­catch­er, osprey, caper­cail­lie, sal­mon, fresh water pearl mus­sel, cross­bill and cres­ted tit. Your sur­vey must pick up any impact made on these pri­or­ity species.
  11. Land­forms and geodiversity
  12. The Nation­al Park has the largest col­lec­tion of dif­fer­ent gla­cial land­forms out­side arc­tic Canada some of which are with­in des­ig­nated sites. Some sites are des­ig­nated as a Site of Spe­cial Sci­entif­ic Interest or a Geo­lo­gic­al Con­ser­va­tion Review site, and in these cir­cum­stances a full assess­ment will be

8

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

required. This should include sur­vey, assess­ment and mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures. Fur­ther inform­a­tion can be found at: www​.snh​.org​.uk/snhi and www​.jncc​.gov​.uk. For large devel­op­ment and extrac­tion applic­a­tions, applic­ants are advised to employ a qual­i­fied geo­lo­gist or geo­mor­pho­lo­gist to pre­pare the required information.

  1. The plan­ning author­ity will take these land­forms and oth­er geo­lo­gic­al fea­tures into account when determ­in­ing applications.
  2. Soils and soil carbon
  3. The Nation­al Park con­tains a diversity of soils and the prin­ciples applied to biod­iversity apply equally to soils. Devel­op­ments on peat soils in par­tic­u­lar will require a soil sur­vey and assess­ment. Mit­ig­a­tion and resid­ual effects fol­low­ing all poten­tial mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures must also be iden­ti­fied with­in the assess­ment. This may include remov­al and tem­por­ary stor­age of soils where long-term dam­age is likely to occur.
  4. Soils must be assessed for: • func­tion­al role in sup­port­ing hab­it­ats and spe­cies; • rar­ity of their intrins­ic phys­ic­al, chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al fea­tures; • con­tri­bu­tion to eco­sys­tem ser­vices such as water puri­fic­a­tion, flood mit­ig­a­tion and car­bon stor­age; and • peat depth and basic peat­land char­ac­ter­ist­ics, where appropriate.
  5. You should adopt an approach which min­im­ises dis­turb­ance or dis­rup­tion to peat­land areas and oth­er organ­ic soils where pos­sible, as these soils are valu­able for car­bon stor­age and hab­it­at support.
  6. By adopt­ing this approach, the volume of excav­ated peat can be min­im­ised and the com­monly exper­i­enced dif­fi­culties in deal­ing with sur­plus peat waste reduced. The gen­er­a­tion of sur­plus peat waste is a dif­fi­cult area which needs to be addressed from the out­set, giv­en the lim­ited scope for re-use. Land­scap­ing with waste peat (or soil) may not be of eco­lo­gic­al bene­fit and con­sequently a waste man­age­ment exemp­tion from SEPA may not apply.
  7. Fur­ther guid­ance, in rela­tion to peat can be found in SEPA’s Reg­u­lat­ory Pos­i­tion State­ment – Devel­op­ments on Peat, and early con­sulta­tion with SEPA should be under­taken on sites which con­tain peat soils or poten­tial Ground­wa­ter Depend­ant Ter­restri­al Eco­sys­tems. Guid­ance in iden­ti­fic­a­tion of peat bogs can also be found in a Func­tion­al Wet­land Typo­logy for Scot­land. See www​.sniffer​.org​.uk. 36.
  8. Con­nectiv­ity of hab­it­at and frag­ment­a­tion Hab­it­ats are often linked to each oth­er and are usu­ally of great­er eco­lo­gic­al value as a con­sequence. Devel­op­ments should main­tain exist­ing con­nec­tions and seek to cre­ate more wherever pos­sible. The move­ment of spe­cies along these hab­it­at net­works should be con­sidered, and cre­at­ing bar­ri­ers to move­ment avoided. Frag­ment­a­tion of exist­ing hab­it­ats and hab­it­at net­works must be avoided. The assess­ment of a site must include ana­lys­is of the connectivity.
  9. Invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies 37. The Nation­al Park has pop­u­la­tions of some invas­ive, non-nat­ive spe­cies, which include: Japan­ese knot­weed (Fal­lopia japon­ica), giant hog­weed (Her­acleum mantegi­azzan­um) and Him­alay­an bal­sam (Impa­tiens glandulifera).

9

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

  1. If a sur­vey shows these or oth­er invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies are present on a site, the developers must remove them and ensure that they do not spread from the site. There are also a num­ber of invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies in Scot­land which are not cur­rently in the Nation­al Park. You must ensure no invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies are intro­duced into the Nation­al Park as a con­sequence of devel­op­ment works. This com­monly occurs through soil con­tam­in­ated with seed or root mater­i­al. Where large volumes of soil are moved or intro­duced to a site, you may be required to sub­mit a soil man­age­ment plan to guard against this possibility.
  2. Japan­ese knot­weed, giant hog­weed and Him­alay­an bal­sam are regarded as con­trolled waste. It can be con­trolled or dis­posed of on-site but if plant, mater­i­al or soil pol­luted with this spe­cies is sent for dis­pos­al else­where it must be accom­pan­ied by appro­pri­ate Waste Trans­fer doc­u­ment­a­tion and dis­posed of in a licensed, lined land­fill site. Developers should seek advice on the dis­pos­al of these plants from the Scot­tish Envir­on­ment Pro­tec­tion Agency (SEPA), see www.sepa. org​.uk and www​.net​regs​.gov​.uk.
  3. If a devel­op­ment is respons­ible for the intro­duc­tion of an invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies either with­in or out­with the site, the developer will be required to remove the spe­cies and dis­pose of mater­i­al. You must set out how you intend to do this in inform­a­tion sup­plied with your plan­ning application.
  4. Bio secur­ity
  5. There are par­tic­u­lar bio secur­ity issues asso­ci­ated with pro­pos­als close to stand­ing or run­ning water. Applic­ants must take care not to intro­duce invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies such as plants or parasites.
  6. Equip­ment and machinery should be cleaned away from the water course, espe­cially if it has been used in anoth­er water body with­in 14 days or has recently been used over­seas. You must set out how you intend to deal with this issue in inform­a­tion sup­plied with your plan­ning applic­a­tion. Step 2: Factor in con­straints and opportunities
  7. The inform­a­tion provided in the sur­vey must be assessed against the pos­sible effects of the devel­op­ment on the nat­ur­al her­it­age interests iden­ti­fied. If adverse effects are found, the assess­ment must include details of steps to be taken to min­im­ise and mit­ig­ate any dam­age arising. The assess­ment must also con­sider any leftover effects to be addressed.
  8. Oppor­tun­it­ies for nat­ur­al her­it­age enhance­ment or res­tor­a­tion should be sought at this stage. You are encour­aged to identi­fy as part of the sup­port­ing inform­a­tion sub­mit­ted with your applic­a­tion, steps to be taken to restore or enhance the exist­ing nat­ur­al her­it­age value of the site.
  9. Most devel­op­ments are suit­able for the incor­por­a­tion of a range of meas­ures for pos­it­ive effects on the nat­ur­al her­it­age. It is expec­ted that such meas­ures are incor­por­ated and early dis­cus­sions on your pro­pos­als are wel­comed. Examples include the incor­por­a­tion of swift nest spaces or bat roost sites, use of loc­al proven­ance trees and seeds or main­tain­ing and enhan­cing wild­life cor­ridors through sites and buf­fer strips around developments.

10

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Step 3: Plan for mon­it­or­ing and management

  1. All mit­ig­a­tion, com­pens­a­tion and enhance­ment meas­ures, wheth­er on-site or off-site, will need ongo­ing man­age­ment. You should draw up schemes for mon­it­or­ing and man­age­ment and include these with the devel­op­ment pro­pos­al. This might for example include land­scape man­age­ment plans.

11

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Examples of devel­op­ments and require­ments for nat­ur­al heritage

  1. The fol­low­ing examples explain what inform­a­tion is required by the plan­ning author­ity in sup­port of your plan­ning applic­a­tion. They are not exhaust­ive, but simply reflect fre­quently received applic­a­tions for development.

|Devel­op­ment on green­field site|Phase I sur­vey, not­able spe­cies and mam­mal sur­vey| |Devel­op­ment close to or on Ancient Wood­land sites|National Veget­a­tion Clas­si­fic­a­tion Sur­vey Insects Fungi Bry­ophytes Nest­ing Birds Not­able spe­cies and mam­mal sur­vey| |Con­ver­sions of old or aban­doned build­ings includ­ing barns and steadings|Bat sur­vey, barn owl sur­vey| |Domest­ic exten­sions for example con­ser­vat­or­ies, out­houses, etc|Bat sur­vey| |Con­ver­sion of loft space or change to roofs|Bat sur­vey| |Oth­er sur­veys which may be neces­sary depend­ing on the nature of the site, the devel­op­ment, and its setting|Reptile Amphi­bi­ans Inver­teb­rates Nest­ing birds Nation­al Veget­a­tion Clas­si­fic­a­tion Sur­vey|

  • In accord­ance with the Inspire’”Directive (2007/2/EC) of the European Par­lia­ment where an NVC sur­vey is required EUNIS cod­ing must be attrib­uted to each NVC com­munity type.

12

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Table 1: Sur­vey cal­en­dar for nat­ur­al her­it­age interests in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park This sur­vey cal­en­dar is a gen­er­al guide only. The tim­ing of sur­veys can be affected by weath­er and may be spe­cif­ic to loc­a­tion (par­tic­u­larly veget­a­tion sur­veys). Cer­tain bird spe­cies, for example rap­tors or waders will require spe­cies spe­cif­ic sur­veys at defined times of year. Sur­veys should be con­duc­ted dur­ing suit­able con­di­tions, i.e. otter sur­veys under­taken dur­ing nor­mal or low flow and not when water is high. KEY Optim­um sur­vey peri­od Sub-optim­al sur­vey peri­od Unsuit­able sur­vey period

13

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Spe­ciesJanu­aryFeb­ru­aryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptem­berOcto­berNovem­berDecem­ber
Habitats/​Veget­a­tionPhase IPhase I & NVC SurveyPhase I
Amphi­bi­ansHibern­at­ingPond sur­veys-eggs in AprilLar­vae surveysTer­restri­al hab­it­at surveyHibern­at­ing
BadgersSett sur­veyBait mark­ingSett sur­vey and bait markingBait mark­ingSett sur­vey
BatsHiberna­tion roost surveyEmer­gence sur­veys, sum­mer and mater­nity roostHiberna­tion roost survey
BirdsWinter spe­ciesBreed­ing birdsMigrant spe­ciesWinter spe­cies
FishTim­ing depend­ant on migra­tion and breed­ing of spe­cies concerned
FungiSur­vey period
Inver­teb­ratesA num­ber of sur­veys may be required in this period
LichensSur­veys can be car­ried out all year
Mosses & LiverwortsFruit­ing bod­ies may be required for iden­ti­fic­a­tion-spe­cies dependant
OtterLim­ited by veget­a­tion cov­er and weath­er rather than seasons
Pine MartenSur­veys all year — Optim­um sur­vey peri­od is spring
Red Squir­relSur­veys all year-optim­um spring/​summer
Rep­tilesReduced bask­ing time
Water voleHab­it­at surveyHab­it­at, field signs and activ­ity surveysHab­it­at survey
Wild­catSur­veys can be con­duc­ted through­out the year

This inform­a­tion should be used as a guide only and some sur­veys may be required to be under­taken out­with spe­cified months.

14

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Require­ments for applic­a­tions affect­ing an Inter­na­tion­al or Nation­al Des­ig­na­tion (Natura 2000) site

  1. Spe­cif­ic issues must be addressed where your applic­a­tion has, or may have, an impact on a Natura site. These issues are spe­cif­ic to the rel­ev­ant site, the reas­on for its des­ig­na­tion and its qual­i­fy­ing fea­tures. The tests for con­sid­er­ing pro­pos­als affect­ing Natura sites are strict and the plan­ning author­ity must be sat­is­fied that the pro­pos­al will not have an adverse effect upon the integ­rity of any Natura site.
  2. Natura Sites are: • Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion (SAC and pSAC) – a European des­ig­na­tion which pro­tects nat­ur­al hab­it­ats and wild flora and fauna oth­er than birds • Spe­cial Pro­tec­tion Area (SPA and PSPA) — a European des­ig­na­tion which pro­tects wild birds • Ram­sar Site an inter­na­tion­al des­ig­na­tion which pro­tects wet­lands through the accom­pa­ny­ing SPA/SSSI des­ig­na­tion and is giv­en equi­val­ent pro­tec­tion as Natura as a mat­ter of policy How to com­ply with the require­ments of the policy
  3. Almost half of Nation­al Park’s area (49 per­cent) is covered by Natura des­ig­nated sites. In addi­tion, river SACs are extens­ive through­out the Nation­al Park. For maps and details of all Natura sites, please see SNH’s web­site www​.snh​.gov​.uk. Many devel­op­ments have poten­tial to affect them, both dir­ectly as a res­ult of site spe­cif­ic impacts, and indir­ectly as a res­ult of impacts of devel­op­ment on the qual­i­fy­ing fea­tures bey­ond the bound­ary of the des­ig­nated sites. You must ensure that you con­sider all pos­sible impacts as a res­ult of your application.
  4. While each des­ig­nated site has its own qual­i­fy­ing fea­tures which must be appro­pri­ately con­sidered and man­aged, there are two par­tic­u­lar issues which affect many sites and there­fore com­munit­ies as a res­ult of their wide ran­ging and, often, off site, impacts. These are impacts on river SAC sites and impacts on SPAs with caper­cail­lie as a res­ult of recre­ation­al dis­turb­ance. Both these types of Natura site and their qual­i­fy­ing interests extend through­out much of the Nation­al Park where devel­op­ment is likely to occur. In addi­tion, some non des­ig­nated wood­lands host caper­cail­lie that are the qual­i­fy­ing fea­ture of SPAs nearby. The impact of devel­op­ment can in cer­tain cir­cum­stances be mit­ig­ated to ensure no adverse impact on the integ­rity of Natura site/​s. Your pro­pos­al must there­fore com­ply with the mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures set out here, in addi­tion to any oth­er meas­ures required to ensure no adverse impact on the qual­i­fy­ing fea­tures of the site.
  5. A suite of pos­sible mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures to address these poten­tial impacts has been devised for developers to provide the neces­sary inform­a­tion to allow the determ­in­a­tion of their applic­a­tion. To com­ply with the policy you must provide the fol­low­ing inform­a­tion and meet the require­ments of the cri­ter­ia lis­ted. Please note that you must con­sider sim­il­ar effects of oth­er devel­op­ments (approved or sub­mit­ted) in com­bin­a­tion with your own devel­op­ment where necessary.

15

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Impact on the river SAC sites

  1. Pol­lu­tion and silta­tion from con­struc­tion sites
  2. Con­tam­in­a­tion of a pro­tec­ted water course can arise from chem­ic­al pol­lut­ants or particles washed into it from con­struc­tion sites.
  3. Mit­ig­a­tion required: that site oper­a­tions are man­aged in a way that the like­li­hood is removed. This should be achieved through safe hand­ling of poten­tial pol­lut­ants and pro­vi­sion of inter­cept­or drains, fil­ters and oth­er meas­ures on site. These meas­ures must be set out in a con­struc­tion meth­od state­ment (CMS) which should be sub­mit­ted with your plan­ning applic­a­tion and must fol­low recog­nised guidelines and best prac­tice. The CMS must clearly demon­strate that risks to water courses and ground water are elim­in­ated through applic­a­tion of good site man­age­ment in accord­ance with accep­ted best prac­tice and guidelines. Devel­op­ment may not com­mence until it has been demon­strated to the plan­ning author­ity that the meas­ures in the CMS have been adop­ted for onsite man­age­ment. Where required through stat­ute con­trolled activ­ity reg­u­la­tions (CAR) must be com­plied with.
  4. Require­ment for Sus­tain­able Urb­an Drain­age Scheme (SuDS)
  5. The use of hard imper­vi­ous sur­faces with­in devel­op­ment is likely to increase the speed that rain­fall enters water­courses. This can increase flood events caus­ing dam­age to river hab­it­ats. This rain­fall may also bring particles from these sur­faces which may cloud water and reduce its quality.
  6. A Sus­tain­able Drain­age Scheme (SuDS) must be sub­mit­ted with your plan­ning applic­a­tion and there­after imple­men­ted. The SuDS will inter­cept water and either allow increased infilt­ra­tion rates by using por­ous sur­faces or slow run­off rates through stor­age mech­an­isms. 57.
  7. Pol­lu­tion from waste water Waste water from devel­op­ment con­tains a num­ber of chem­ic­als that could pol­lute water courses.
  8. Mit­ig­a­tion required: All waste water from devel­op­ments must be treated at waste water treat­ment works to remove harm­ful levels of pol­lut­ants. There must be capa­city with­in water treat­ment works for the volume of mater­i­al gen­er­ated by devel­op­ments and the facil­it­ies needed to remove pol­lut­ants to a level where there will be no adverse effects upon the integ­rity of Natura sites. Devel­op­ment may not com­mence until it has been demon­strated to the plan­ning author­ity that there is suf­fi­cient capa­city in loc­al waste water treat­ment works in terms of capa­city and abil­ity to remove pol­lut­ants to recom­men­ded stand­ards at the time of commencement.

16

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

  1. Water extrac­tion
  2. Water for devel­op­ments will be sup­plied from pub­lic or private sys­tems. The increase in water extrac­tion may reduce water level in pro­tec­ted water courses and this may affect the integ­rity of the site, through changes in tem­per­at­ure, water level itself, or oth­er effects of a reduced flow.
  3. Mit­ig­a­tion required: the water sup­ply must be avail­able for the devel­op­ment from known sources and these must have a demon­strated capa­city to sup­ply the required water without adverse effects that would affect the integ­rity of the Natura site. If the capa­city has not been demon­strated then devel­op­ment will be refused until it is in place.
  4. Dis­turb­ance to otter
  5. Otters may be dis­turbed by con­struc­tion activ­ity, noise, light­ing and oth­er fea­tures of the devel­op­ment design or by activ­ity from the devel­op­ment fol­low­ing its construction.
  6. Mit­ig­a­tion required: a full sur­vey is under­taken, in accord­ance with a recog­nised meth­od­o­logy, to determ­ine if there are otters in the vicin­ity of the devel­op­ment or its pro­vi­sions. An apprais­al will be required of the con­struc­tion activ­ity, design and use of the devel­op­ment to see if there would be any effect upon otters. Any iden­ti­fied effects must be elim­in­ated through modi­fic­a­tions to pro­pos­als and detailed with­in a Spe­cies Pro­tec­tion Plan (SPP). Sur­vey, apprais­al and SPP must be sub­mit­ted with plan­ning applic­a­tion. Impact on SPAs with caper­cail­lie as a res­ult of recre­ation­al disturbance
  7. Dis­turb­ance to capercaillie
  8. Caper­cail­lie are par­tic­u­larly sens­it­ive to dis­turb­ance caused as a res­ult of people recre­at­ing in pine wood­land where their ground based life­style makes them par­tic­u­larly vul­ner­able to dogs. Caper­cail­lie move between forests in a par­tic­u­lar loc­al­ity, so that they may also need to be pro­tec­ted in non- des­ig­nated wood­land as part of the pro­tec­tion for SPA’s.
  9. Mit­ig­a­tion required: the mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures must include an approved on-site Recre­ation Man­age­ment Plan and an agreed con­tri­bu­tion (assessed on a case by case basis) to off-site mit­ig­a­tion works through the Cairngorms Caper­cail­lie Action Plan, to com­ply with the fol­low­ing cri­ter­ia. Such mit­ig­a­tion must be assessed as suf­fi­cient to ensure that there would be no adverse effect on the integ­rity of the site/​s, either alone or in com­bin­a­tion with oth­er plans or pro­jects. Cri­ter­ia 1: Cur­rent and estim­ated recre­ation­al use and provision
  10. The mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als should be based on a detailed and evid­ence-based under­stand­ing of cur­rent recre­ation­al use of the area, (both spa­tially and over time) in terms of num­bers, dis­tri­bu­tion, beha­viour and reas­ons and take account of the pre­dicted future recre­ation demand arising from the pro­posed development.

17

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Cri­ter­ia 2: Caper­cail­lie pop­u­la­tion and site issues

  1. The mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als should be based on a detailed and evid­ence-based under­stand­ing of cur­rent recre­ation­al use of the area, (both spa­tially and over time) in terms of num­bers, dis­tri­bu­tion and beha­vi­or and take account of the pre­dicted future recre­ation demand arising from the pro­posed devel­op­ment. This should give an under­stand­ing of cur­rent caper­cail­lie pop­u­la­tion with­in the affected sites and with­in con­nec­ted non-des­ig­nated wood­land. Cri­ter­ia 3: Best practice
  2. The mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als should be built on best prac­tice as agreed with the loc­al plan­ning author­ity and Scot­tish Nat­ur­al Her­it­age. Cri­ter­ia 4: Loc­a­tion and time-specific
  3. The mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als should be designed to avoid an increase in dis­turb­ance through­out dif­fer­ent times of the day and year, along­side adequate con­sid­er­a­tion of cur­rent and likely future levels and pat­terns of recre­ation­al use. Cri­ter­ia 5: Deliv­er tar­geted site spe­cif­ic mitigation
  4. The Recre­ation Man­age­ment Plan should include a detailed pack­age of on- site mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures that address the issues raised in cri­ter­ia 1 – 4. They must clearly demon­strate that the com­bin­a­tion of mit­ig­a­tions will ensure that there is no adverse effect upon the integ­rity of any Natura site. The meas­ures for mit­ig­a­tion are likely to include: • aware­ness rais­ing through ranger activ­ity, leaf­lets, sig­nage and media com­mu­nic­a­tions • pro­vi­sion of altern­at­ive foot­paths, oth­er routes or green space • path remov­al to increase core refuge areas • hab­it­at improve­ment • hab­it­at expan­sion • screen­ing with­in wood­land areas • spe­cif­ic meas­ures to increase dog con­trol Cri­ter­ia 6: Com­munity engage­ment and support
  5. The pro­pos­als should demon­strate effect­ive engage­ment with the com­munity and recre­ation­al users and a suf­fi­cient degree of sup­port to ensure the pro­pos­als are effect­ive. Cri­ter­ia 7: Prac­tic­al enforcement
  6. The mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als should demon­strate that the meas­ures will be prac­tic­ally and leg­ally enforce­able and main­tained for the life­time of the devel­op­ment. Cri­ter­ia 8: Phasing
  7. For devel­op­ment of more than 50 units a phas­ing approach should be adop­ted. The deliv­ery of sub­sequent phases will be con­di­tioned upon the suc­cess­ful deliv­ery of mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als for the pre­vi­ous phases. The cri­ter­ia for suc­cess will be part of the Appro­pri­ate Assess­ment and con­di­tioned to any approv­al. The mit­ig­a­tion pro­pos­als should identi­fy how mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures will be effect­ive at the appro­pri­ate time in line with the con­struc­tion and devel­op­ment phasing.

18

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan Sup­ple­ment­ary Guid­ance – Policy 4 Nat­ur­al Heritage

Cri­ter­ia 9: Mon­it­or­ing, review and adapt­ive management

  1. The mit­ig­a­tion and man­age­ment meas­ures must be mon­itored and reviewed in a man­ner agreed with the loc­al plan­ning author­ity and Scot­tish Nat­ur­al Her­it­age to ensure effect­ive­ness for the life­time of the devel­op­ment and a mech­an­ism put in place to take fur­ther man­age­ment meas­ures to reduce dis­turb­ance if neces­sary. Cri­ter­ia 10: Co-ordin­ated action
  2. Mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures must demon­strate aware­ness of oth­er devel­op­ments and pro­jects pro­posed, sub­mit­ted for per­mis­sion and approved but not yet built, that may affect the same des­ig­nated sites and to ensure that in-com­bin­a­tion effects are included. Any con­flicts in effect­ive­ness or deliv­ery must be man­aged with­in the mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures to ensure no adverse effect upon any sites integ­rity. Cri­ter­ia 11: Proportionality
  3. The evid­ence base, inform­a­tion and sub­sequent mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures must be pro­por­tion­ate to the level of poten­tial effect and size of devel­op­ment, always how­ever hav­ing regard to the fact that they must be suf­fi­cient to demon­strate that there would be no adverse effect on the integ­rity of any Natura site, either along or in com­bin­a­tion with oth­er plans or projects.

19

×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!