Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

A greenhouse gas emissions assessment and target scenario for the Cairngorms National Park

SMALL WORLDCONSULTING

A green­house gas emis­sions assess­ment and tar­get scen­ario for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park C A report by Small World Con­sult­ing Ltd

Octo­ber 2022

Small World Con­sult­ing Ltd Lan­caster Envir­on­ment Centre Gor­don Man­ley Build­ing Lan­caster Uni­ver­sity, Lan­caster LA1 4YQ info@ sw​-con​sult​ing​.co​.uk 01524 510272 www​.sw​-con​sult​ing​.co​.uk

Con­tents Exec­ut­ive summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Background………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 This report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Lim­it­a­tions and uncertainties……………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Key highlights…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Tar­gets scenario………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8

  1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12
  2. Policy drivers…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………13 2.1. Cli­mate change policy………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 2.2. Health impacts of air pollution……………………………………………………………………………………….15 2.3. Cli­mate-driv­en impacts in the UK……………………………………………………………………………………15 2.4. Real world action and beha­viour change………………………………………………………………………..16 2.5. Policy implic­a­tions for loc­al plan­ning authorities……………………………………………………………….17
  3. Cairngorms Nation­al Park: demo­graph­ic pro­file and key statistics…………………………………..18 3.1. People and key characteristics………………………………………………………………………………………..19 3.2. Geo­graphy and landscape………………………………………………………………………………………………21 3.3. Con­sump­tion and spend­ing characteristics………………………………………………………………………..22
  4. GHG report­ing con­ven­tions and methods……………………………………………………………………..23
  5. Cairngorms Nation­al Park: Con­sump­tion-based GHG emissions…………………………………….27 5.1. Res­ults overview…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….27 5.2. Res­id­ents’ and vis­it­ors’ GHG foot­print components…………………………………………………………..30 5.2.1. Food…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………30 5.2.2. Homes and accom­mod­a­tion away from home……………………………………………………………….31 5.2.3. Travel………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32 5.2.4. Everything else…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..34 5.2.5. Com­par­is­on of res­id­ents’ GHG emis­sions with UK nation­al aver­age by category…………….36 5.3. Industry assessment………………………………………………………………………………………………………36 5.3.1. Scope of industry assessment………………………………………………………………………………………37 5.3.2. Industry sec­tor analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………….37 5.3.3. Energy-only industry analysis……………………………………………………………………………………..43 5.3.4. Large emit­ters analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………44 5.3.5. Com­par­is­on of annu­al industry foot­print with UK averages…………………………………………44 5.4. Ana­lys­is of emis­sions from through-traffic and major roads……………………………………………..45

5.5. Land use emissions………………………………………………………………………………………………………….46 5.6. Factors for con­sid­er­a­tion in land use target-setting……………………………………………………………48 5.6.1. Trees, wood­lands and forestry……………………………………………………………………………………….48 5.6.2. Loc­al author­ity opportunities………………………………………………………………………………………..49 5.6.3. Peat­lands and wetlands………………………………………………………………………………………………..49 5.6.4. Agri­cul­tur­al land­scape and food production………………………………………………………………….50 5.6.5. UK tim­ber pro­duc­tion context……………………………………………………………………………………..51

  1. A vis­ion for a low-car­bon Nation­al Park: GHG targets…………………………………………………..54 6.1. Scen­ario based on land use tar­gets appor­tioned from the Sixth Car­bon Budget…………………..57 6.2. Scen­ario based on land use tar­gets from the new Part­ner­ship Plan…………………………………..61
  2. Con­clu­sions and recommendations………………………………………………………………………………64
  3. Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..67
  4. Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..68
  5. Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………………………………76 10.1. Appendix: Scot­tish Policy Com­par­is­on to UK/ England…………………………………………………….76 10.2. Appendix: Nation­al Park key statistics……………………………………………………………………………..78 10.3. Appendix: Sum­mary data­sets used for car­bon foot­print and con­fid­ence levels…………………….79 10.4. Appendix: Car­bon foot­print defin­i­tions and data sources…………………………………………………80 10.5. Appendix: Res­id­ents GHG emissions……………………………………………………………………………..81 10.6. Appendix: Vis­it­ors GHG emissions………………………………………………………………………………..82 10.7. Appendix. Industry foot­print estimates…………………………………………………………………………….83 10.7.1. Appendix: SIC Codes (2007) sum­mary and IDBR description………………………………………..83 10.7.2. Appendix: IDBR industry footprint………………………………………………………………………………..84 10.7.3. Appendix: IDBR vs GVA industry foot­print estimates……………………………………………………85 10.7.4. Appendix: Pol­lu­tion invent­ory for large emitters…………………………………………………………..86 10.8. Appendix: Emis­sions from major roads………………………………………………………………………….87 10.9. Appendix: Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………88 10.9.1. Appendix: His­tory of mod­el development……………………………………………………………………..88 10.9.2. Appendix: Mod­el devel­op­ment for Nation­al Park family……………………………………………….88 10.9.3. Appendix: Out­line of emis­sions estim­a­tion methodology………………………………………………89 10.9.4. Appendix: Tar­get set­ting rationale……………………………………………………………………………….90 10.9.5. Appendix: Assump­tions for land use sector…………………………………………………………………93 10.9.6. Appendix: Land class cat­egor­ies for report­ing nationally………………………………………………..95 10.9.7. Appendix: Changes in meth­od­o­logy for quan­ti­fy­ing peat­land GHG emissions………………………95 10.9.8. Appendix: Tar­get set­ting meth­od­o­logy for land use change…………………………………………..98

Doc­u­ment control

Nation­al Park Car­bon Foot­print Mod­el Devel­op­ment by: Dr Dmitry Yumashev, Mike Bern­ers-Lee, Lor­raine Ritchen-Stones, sup­por­ted by rep­res­ent­at­ives from UK Nation­al Parks and AONBs.

Tech­nic­al Sup­port: Mat­thew Bond MRes, Dr Tom Dav­ies, Dr Han­nah Wright, Dr Tom Higgs

Mod­el res­ults expor­ted from: Ver­sion 10 on the 25th May 2022

Report pre­pared by: Lor­raine Ritchen-Stones MBA, MSc, Dr Dmitry Yumashev, Mike Bern­ers-Lee, Dr Han­nah Wright, Mat­thew Bond MRes, Dr Tom Dav­ies, Dr Tom Higgs

Small World Con­sult­ing Ltd, +44 (0) 1524 510272, www​.sw​-con​sult​ing​.co​.uk

Proofread­ing: Jen­nifer Lyon, Lion­ess Translation

Res­ults qual­ity checked by: Mike Berners-Lee

Title: A green­house gas emis­sions assess­ment and tar­get scen­ari­os for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park

Report Ver­sion: 8

Status: Approved by Gav­in Miles, Head of Stra­tegic Plan­ning, Cairngorms Nation­al Park Authority

Dated: 28th Octo­ber 2022

Approved by: Approved by Mike Berners-Lee

Expec­ted Changes: Cli­ent feed­back incorporated

Doc­u­ment Details

Ref­er­ence: Cairngorms NP GHG Assess­ment Report v8 221028

Tem­plate: Nation­al Park Car­bon Baseline Report Tem­plate Ver­sion 17.doc

No of pages: 105

Acknow­ledge­ments

We thank the Cairngorms Nation­al Park pro­ject team for their input and support.

Exec­ut­ive summary

Back­ground

As the world wakes up to the cli­mate and wider envir­on­ment­al emer­gency, rap­id reduc­tion in green­house gas emis­sions and sus­tain­able land man­age­ment are becom­ing increas­ingly cent­ral to the loc­al, nation­al and inter­na­tion­al policy agendas.

Togeth­er, the UK’s 15 Nation­al Parks and 46 Areas of Out­stand­ing Nation­al Beauty (AONBs) are home to over 1.5 mil­lion res­id­ents, attract approx­im­ately 250 mil­lion vis­it­ors per year, and account for around 18% of the UK’s land area. If these pro­tec­ted land­scapes can become exem­plars of low- car­bon trans­ition and envir­on­ment-con­scious land man­age­ment, their nation­al and inter­na­tion­al pro­files could give them a level of influ­ence that far out­weighs the scale of their own emis­sions. The excit­ing and cre­at­ive chal­lenge for each pro­tec­ted land­scape is to find a way to cut emis­sions in line with cur­rent sci­ence, and be lead­ers in land stew­ard­ship and plan­ning author­ity while sim­ul­tan­eously cre­at­ing bet­ter places for people to live, work and visit.

This report

This report, for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park, is one of a series of meth­od­o­lo­gic­ally com­pat­ible reports pro­duced for each UK Nation­al Park and Welsh AONB, with the Cots­wolds AONB and Can­nock Chase AONB in Eng­land also join­ing. They are designed to provide a robust and con­sist­ent evid­ence basis for cli­mate action, matched to the unique char­ac­ter­ist­ics and cir­cum­stances of each pro­tec­ted land­scape, as we enter an era in which cli­mate mit­ig­a­tion and sus­tain­able land man­age­ment become ever more cent­ral to all our lives, our work, and to all policy decisions.

This report con­tains a con­sump­tion-based assess­ment of the green­house gas emis­sions attrib­ut­able to res­id­ents and vis­it­ors, includ­ing travel to and from the land­scape (Fig­ure 1), and a set of Par­is- aligned tar­get recom­mend­a­tions for trans­ition­ing to a low-car­bon economy.

Con­sump­tion-based emis­sions report­ing dif­fers from more tra­di­tion­al pro­duc­tion-based report­ing, such as that used by the UK in set­ting its 2050 net zero tar­get. A pro­duc­tion-based assess­ment would cov­er all the emis­sions that are dir­ectly pro­duced with­in the bound­ary of the land­scape wheth­er by people or busi­nesses or from land, plus those arising from pro­duc­tion of the elec­tri­city used with­in the land­scape. How­ever, the con­sump­tion-based approach adop­ted here cov­ers, in addi­tion, all indir­ect emis­sions that are embod­ied in the goods and ser­vices con­sumed by res­id­ents and vis­it­ors with­in the land­scape. In doing so, it bet­ter reflects the full cli­mate impact of people’s life­styles, and brings into focus for poli­cy­makers import­ant areas of cli­mate impact that a pro­duc­tion-based assess­ment over­looks. The most import­ant of these are the impact of food, of oth­er pur­chased items (such as cars, clothes, IT equip­ment, house­hold goods and fur­nish­ings), and of res­id­ents’ and vis­it­ors’ travel to and from the land­scape, out­side its boundaries.

Account­ing for emis­sions from land use and man­age­ment is also cru­cial for Nation­al Parks and AONBs. These land­scapes are mostly rur­al, with com­par­at­ively small pop­u­la­tion and large parts of land under vari­ous forms of agri­cul­tur­al man­age­ment, in addi­tion to non-agri­cul­tur­al hab­it­ats such

pre­dom­in­antly from rumin­ants (meth­ane), syn­thet­ic fer­til­iser use (nitrous oxide), and degrad­ing peat­lands (mostly CO2). These emis­sions are, to a degree, com­pensated by car­bon sequest­ra­tion in exist­ing wood­lands, mead­ows, hedgerows, and healthy peat­lands, while agri­cul­tur­al soils could also sequester car­bon under cer­tain types of man­age­ment. Redu­cing land-based emis­sions and scal­ing up land-based car­bon sequest­ra­tion efforts is going to be cru­cial for address­ing the joint cli­mate and eco­lo­gic­al emergencies.

One fea­ture of con­sump­tion-based report­ing is that it does not include emis­sions from industry (except where an industry’s goods and ser­vices are con­sumed by res­id­ents and vis­it­ors). There­fore, for per­spect­ive, this report also includes a simple estim­ate of emis­sions related to indus­tries with­in the Nation­al Park or AONB, includ­ing their sup­ply chains. It is import­ant to note that there is some inev­it­able over­lap between industry-related emis­sions and res­id­ents’ and vis­it­ors’ emis­sions, for example when people buy from loc­al busi­nesses with­in the area. Like­wise, there is an over­lap between emis­sions from agri­cul­ture as an industry sec­tor and land-based emis­sion with­in each land­scape. Fig­ure 1 illus­trates the rela­tion­ship between the main com­pon­ents of our cent­ral assess­ment and the industry emissions.

Industry

Res­id­ents Land use & man­age­ment Vis­it­ors while in the area

Fig­ure 1: Bound­ar­ies of the green­house gas foot­print assess­ment Vis­it­ors trav­el­ling to/​from the area

This report also includes a scen­ario for Par­is-aligned green­house gas emis­sion tar­gets across six key areas. These areas were selec­ted for the ori­gin­al Lake Dis­trict Nation­al Park assess­ment, and have been chosen in order to find a best fit” between com­pet­ing desires: to cov­er everything of sig­ni­fic­ance with­in the influ­ence of loc­al poli­cy­makers, to keep the bound­ary simple to describe, to avoid double-count­ing, and to make use of any data read­ily avail­able for track­ing pro­gress. As a res­ult, the scope for the tar­get areas is slightly dif­fer­ent from that of the over­all emis­sions assess­ment. The six tar­get areas are:

• Energy-only emis­sions by res­id­ents, vis­it­ors and industry

• Food and drink con­sumed by res­id­ents and vis­it­ors • Oth­er goods pur­chased by res­id­ents and vis­it­ors • Vis­it­or travel to and from the Nation­al Park or AONB • Land use non-CO2 com­pon­ent (includ­ing emis­sions from live­stock and fer­til­isers) • Land use CO2 component

Lim­it­a­tions and uncertainties

Due to the com­plex­ity of sup­ply chains and the lim­it­a­tions of avail­able data, con­sump­tion-based emis­sions estim­ates always con­tain a con­sid­er­able degree of uncer­tainty. How­ever, giv­en cur­rent con­straints on data avail­ab­il­ity, these estim­ates are suf­fi­ciently robust to provide an evid­ence basis for car­bon man­age­ment and tar­get set­ting. The estim­ate of industry-related emis­sions is par­tic­u­larly crude, being based on com­par­at­ively simple rev­en­ue data and gen­er­ic UK-wide emis­sion factors.

Res­ults

Cairngorms Nation­al Park (See Fig­ure 2 — Fig­ure 5) Annu­al emis­sions from res­id­ents Annu­al emis­sions from vis­it­ors while in the Nation­al Park Annu­al emis­sions from vis­it­ors trav­el­ling to/​from the Nation­al Park Annu­al industry emis­sions 277,145 tCO2e (14.4 tCO2e per per­son per year) 89,788 tCO2e (20.8 kgCO2e per vis­it­or-day) 232,591 tCO2e (112.5 kgCO2e per vis­it) 64,853 tCO2e

Key high­lights

The Cairngorms encom­passes the largest area of all the Nation­al Parks but has the fifth-low­est res­id­ent pop­u­la­tion. The Cairngorms res­id­ents’ con­sump­tion is roughly 11% above the UK aver­age (excl. pub­lic ser­vices), which is slightly lower than the aver­age across all Nation­al Parks. The con­sump­tion data shows that the res­id­ents’ health expendit­ure is nearly 36% high­er than the UK aver­age, con­sist­ent with the Nation­al Park hav­ing a dis­pro­por­tion­ately high share of the older population.

In a giv­en year, the foot­print of the res­id­ents of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park is estim­ated to be around 17% high­er than the UK aver­age. Sev­er­al fossil fuel-based sources of green­house gas emis­sions are par­tic­u­larly high. The res­id­ents’ emis­sions from fly­ing and oth­er forms of trans­port (excl. driv­ing) are estim­ated to be around 29% high­er than for an aver­age UK res­id­ent. Driv­ing emis­sions are around 34% above the UK aver­age. The Cairngorms house­hold elec­tri­city foot­print is nearly 58% high­er than the UK aver­age. House­hold fuel emis­sions (exclud­ing vehicle fuel) are just under 11% above those of an aver­age UK res­id­ent, although this estim­ate has high uncer­tainty since mul­tiple prop­er­ties are off the gas grid in the Nation­al Park, and because there is insuf­fi­cient data for resid­ual fuel use (oil, coal, bio­mass). It must be noted that our estim­ates for emis­sions from house­hold fuel and elec­tri­city use do not include renew­able energy solu­tions such as sol­ar panels

and heat pumps, nor do they factor in the uptake of elec­tric vehicles. As of 2019, the share of these tech­no­lo­gies across house­holds was com­par­at­ively low and no suit­able data with suf­fi­cient geo­graph­ic­al detail was available.

The Cairngorms Nation­al Park has one of the highest shares of vis­it­ors stay­ing overnight among all land­scapes on the pro­gramme (just under 50%). Aver­age dur­a­tion of stay for overnight vis­it­ors is around 3.2 days which is on the lower side. Estim­ated aver­age mileage trav­elled on land to get to the Cairngorms the highest among all Nation­al Parks and AONBs ana­lysed (around 280 miles) and is dom­in­ated by cars. Around 27% vis­it­ors are thought to come from over­seas, also the highest among all the land­scapes on the pro­gramme. The vis­it­ors’ foot­print while trav­el­ling to and from the Nation­al Park is dom­in­ated by vehicle fuel (55%), fol­lowed by fly­ing (26%). The foot­print of trav­el­ling to and from the Park is over 2.5 times high­er than while in the Park. The total foot­print of all vis­it­ors (both in the Park and while trav­el­ling to and from) is slightly high­er than that of the residents.

The industry foot­print of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park is dom­in­ated by agri­cul­ture and forestry (30%), and accom­mod­a­tion and food ser­vices (16%). Farm­ing with­in the Nation­al Park is pre­dom­in­antly sheep and cattle pro­duc­tion. A fun­da­ment­al dif­fi­culty with estim­at­ing industry foot­print is that loc­a­tions where com­pan­ies are registered and where the required busi­ness data is avail­able do not always match with the loc­a­tions of busi­ness activ­it­ies and emis­sions. Anoth­er chal­lenge is the insuf­fi­cient num­ber of sec­tors repor­ted in the busi­ness data that matches closely to the bound­ary of a pro­tec­ted land­scape, which forces us to apply gen­er­ic UK-wide emis­sions factors.

The Cairngorms Nation­al Park is estim­ated to have a size­able traffic foot­print from the major A roads (A9, A86, A889 and A95), which amounts to nearly 60% com­pared to the total foot­print of the res­id­ents. Through-traffic is estim­ated to account for over 99% of the emis­sions from the major A roads.

Tar­gets scenario

A min­im­um Par­is-aligned tar­get tra­ject­ory has been con­struc­ted for each of the six ele­ments of the tar­gets, as illus­trated in Fig­ure 6. When com­bined, they res­ult in a net zero date of 2024 for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. The rationale behind select­ing the six emis­sions cat­egor­ies and exclud­ing oth­er sources of emis­sions is provided in Sec­tion 6, togeth­er with an altern­at­ive path­way asso­ci­ated with the full con­sump­tion-based foot­print. We note that the net zero date reflects the unique char­ac­ter­ist­ics of the land­scape, includ­ing the land use types and their respect­ive areas, the num­ber of res­id­ents and vis­it­ors and their con­sump­tion pat­terns, and the level and type of indus­tri­al activ­ity. It also assumes the recom­men­ded decar­bon­isa­tion and car­bon sequest­ra­tion efforts, includ­ing land use change, ratchet up to the required levels imme­di­ately in the base year of the assess­ment. In real­ity, the high levels of ambi­tion for dif­fer­ent sec­tors explored in this report are likely going take sev­er­al years to achieve, giv­en that post-COV­ID emis­sions have largely reboun­ded, and that decar­bon­isa­tion trends to date have been rel­at­ively small in mag­nitude com­pared to what we know is required for keep­ing glob­al warm­ing below the safer 1.5°C lim­it from the Par­is Agree­ment. These factors are expec­ted to push the pro­jec­ted net zero year back by sev­er­al years. The net zero date should there­fore not be taken in isol­a­tion as a level of ambition.

Res­id­ents: 277,145 tCO2e Health, Edu­ca­tion, Oth­er Pub­lic Ser­vices & Admin­is­tra­tion 9% Leis­ure, Recre­ation & Attrac­tions 2% Oth­er Bought Ser­vices 7% Water, Waste & Sew­er­age 2% Hous­ing 5% Vis­it­ors while trav­el­ling to & from the area: 232,591 tCO2e Trains, Buses & Oth­er Trans­port 5% 。 SMALL WORLD CON­SULT­ING House­hold Fuen 9% House­hold Elec­tri­city 4% Per­son­al Flights 26% Vehicle Fuel 55% Vehicle Fuel 15% Car Man­u­fac­ture & Main­ten­ance 14% Oth­er Non-Food Shop­ping 7% Accom­mod­a­tion (Non Home) Excl. Food 0.4% Food & Drink 25% Per­son­al Flights 8% Car Man­u­fac­ture & Main­ten­ance 4% Leis­ure, Recre­ation & Attrac­tions Oth­er Bought Ser­vices 5% Water, Waste & Sew­er­age 3% Oth­er Non-Food Shop­ping 7% Ferry Cross­ings & Cruises 1% Trains, Buses & Oth­er Trans­port 2% 1% House­hold Fuel 1% House­hold Elec­tri­city 0.3% Vehicle Fuel 15% Car Man­u­fac­ture & Main­ten­ance 4% Accom­mod­a­tion (Non Home) Excl. Food 21% Trains, Buses & Oth­er Trans­port 1%

Fig­ure 2: (left) Res­id­ents’ GHG emis­sions in Cairngorms Nation­al Park by per­cent­age Fig­ure 3: (top right) Vis­it­ors’ GHG emis­sions on the way to & from Cairngorms Nation­al Park by per­cent­age Fig­ure 4: (bot­tom right) Vis­it­ors’ GHG emis­sions while in Cairngorms Nation­al Park Vis­it­ors while in the area: 89,788 tCO₂e 2 Food & Drink 429

Pub­lic admin­is­tra­tion & defence 2% Busi­ness admin­is­tra­tion & sup­port ser­vices 4% Pro­fes­sion­al, sci­entif­ic & tech­nic­al 2% Prop­erty 4% Fin­ance & insur­ance 3% Inform­a­tion & com­mu­nic­a­tion 0.4% Accom­mod­a­tion & food ser­vices 16% Industry: 64,853 tCO2e Edu­ca­tion 1% Health 3% Arts, enter­tain­ment, recre­ation & oth­er ser­vices 6% Agri­cul­ture, forestry & fish­ing 30% Pro­duc­tion 10% Con­struc­tion 11% Trans­port & stor­age (inc. postal) 1% Retail 5% Whole­sale 1% Motor trades 1%

Fig­ure 5: A estim­ate of emis­sions from indus­tries with­in the Park and their sup­ply chains (scopes 1, 2 and upstream scope 310

tCO2e per year 0 500,000 1,000,0002,000,0001,500,0001,000,000500,000 2019 2020 Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 Land Use CO2 Land Use Non-CO2 Travel To & From (Excl. Flights; Incl. Car Man­u­fac.): Vis­it­ors Oth­er Non-Food Shop­ping (Incl. Cars): Residents+Visitors Food & Drink: Residents+Visitors Energy-only GHG (Incl. Supp. Chain): Residents+Visitors+Industry ‑Total Tar­geted Emissions

Fig­ure 6: Recom­men­ded tar­get path­ways res­ult­ing in net zero emis­sions for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park by 2024. The path­ways are based on a range of assump­tions, includ­ing using 2019 as the base year and land use tar­gets appor­tioned from the Sixth Car­bon Budget (Sec­tion 6.1). Altern­at­ive land use tar­gets from the new Cairngorms Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan and the asso­ci­ated path­way are con­sidered in Sec­tion 6.2 11 SMALL WORLD CON­SULT­ING 2047 2048 2049 2050

SMALL WORLDCONSULTING

  1. Intro­duc­tion

As the world wakes up to the cli­mate and wider envir­on­ment­al emer­gency, rap­id reduc­tion of green­house gas (GHG) emis­sions and sus­tain­able land man­age­ment are becom­ing increas­ingly cent­ral to the loc­al, nation­al and inter­na­tion­al policy agen­das. In 2019, the UK strengthened its pro­duc­tion-based tar­gets, set­ting itself a leg­ally bind­ing tar­get of net zero by 2050. This promp­ted the fam­ily of UK Nation­al Park Author­it­ies and sev­er­al Areas of Out­stand­ing Nation­al Beauty (AONBs) to seek assess­ment of their green­house gas emis­sions col­lect­ively. The ambi­tion of these pro­tec­ted land­scapes was to go bey­ond the UK Government’s pro­duc­tion-based tar­gets and identi­fy the full con­sump­tion-based scale of the green­house gas emis­sions attrib­ut­able to res­id­ents and vis­it­ors, includ­ing travel to and from the landscape.

This report, for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park, is one of a series of meth­od­o­lo­gic­ally com­pat­ible reports pro­duced for each UK Nation­al Park, each Welsh AONB, as well as the Cots­wolds and Can­nock Chase AONBs in Eng­land. The baseline year for the assess­ment is 2019, the most recent pre-COV­ID year. The report also includes recom­mend­a­tions for Par­is-aligned tar­gets on GHG emis­sions reduc­tion across six key areas, as well as for car­bon sequest­ra­tion through land-based cli­mate mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures. Togeth­er with the estim­ated 2019 GHG baseline, achiev­ing these tar­gets would mean the Cairngorms reach­ing con­sump­tion-based net zero emis­sions by 2024, sub­ject to the tar­gets being ful­filled and to the con­sid­er­able uncer­tain­ties remain­ing in the data.

Togeth­er, the UK’s 15 Nation­al Parks and 46 AONBs are home to over 1.5 mil­lion res­id­ents, attract approx­im­ately 250 mil­lion vis­it­ors per year, account for around 18% of the UK’s land area, and con­tain sig­ni­fic­ant amounts of peat. If they can become exem­plars of low-car­bon trans­ition and envir­on­ment-con­scious land man­age­ment, their nation­al and inter­na­tion­al pro­files could give them a level of influ­ence that far out­weighs the scale of their own emis­sions. The excit­ing and cre­at­ive chal­lenge for each pro­tec­ted land­scape is to find a way to cut emis­sions in line with cur­rent sci­ence, and be lead­ers in land stew­ard­ship while sim­ul­tan­eously cre­at­ing bet­ter places for people to live, work and visit.

Almost every action con­nec­ted with people liv­ing, work­ing and spend­ing time in the pro­tec­ted land­scapes gives rise to green­house gas emis­sions, which lie with­in the influ­ence and there­fore man­age­ment respons­ib­il­it­ies of the Nation­al Park Author­it­ies or Loc­al Author­it­ies for the AONB. While the need to trans­ition from fossil fuels to renew­able energy is the single greatest chal­lenge in respond­ing to the cli­mate emer­gency, for the pro­tec­ted land­scapes in par­tic­u­lar, land man­age­ment is also a crit­ic­al ele­ment of deal­ing with both the cli­mate and biod­iversity crises.

The unique char­ac­ter­ist­ics of each pro­tec­ted land­scape give rise to dif­fer­ent pri­or­it­ies and oppor­tun­it­ies for cut­ting green­house gas emis­sions and for sus­tain­able land man­age­ment. For example, the ratio of vis­it­ors to res­id­ents var­ies greatly. Some Nation­al Parks and AONBs have large indus­tri­al or mil­it­ary sites with­in their bound­ar­ies. To vary­ing degrees, each land­scape is tra­versed by major roads that carry con­sid­er­able volumes of traffic (not neces­sar­ily stop­ping in the area). All these factors affect the eco­nom­ic makeup of each landscape’s geo­graphy, and have strong implic­a­tions for the asso­ci­ated GHG foot­print and decar­bon­isa­tion efforts. In terms of land man­age­ment chal­lenges and oppor­tun­it­ies, the pro­tec­ted land­scape vary greatly in their levels of peat­land and wood­land cov­er­age, in their amount and types of agri­cul­tur­al land, and in the pop­u­la­tion dens­it­ies of res­id­ents and vis­it­ors. 12

SMALL WORLDCON­SULT­ING The main body of this report is designed for a broad audi­ence, includ­ing some who may be less famil­i­ar with car­bon ana­lys­is, but who have an act­ive interest in the find­ings. This includes Nation­al Park and AONB board mem­bers, loc­al busi­nesses, part­ner organ­isa­tions, and mem­bers of the gen­er­al pub­lic who wish to par­ti­cip­ate in the trans­ition to a low-car­bon and sus­tain­able eco­nomy. A tech­nic­al appendix has been pro­duced for those wish­ing to con­sult more meth­od­o­lo­gic­al detail.

  1. Policy drivers 2.1. Cli­mate change policy

While the world has had to focus on deal­ing with the glob­al pan­dem­ic since Janu­ary 2020, cli­mate change has nev­er­the­less remained high on the inter­na­tion­al agenda. This sec­tion sum­mar­ises key drivers for change which the Nation­al Park may wish to respond to in deliv­er­ing its stat­utory duties.

Cli­mate change driv­en by anthro­po­gen­ic GHG emis­sions, plus the wider eco­lo­gic­al crisis, are some of the biggest chal­lenges facing human­ity today, and a joined-up response to tack­ling them is likely to improve both situ­ations. A 2018 report by the Inter­gov­ern­ment­al Pan­el on Cli­mate Change (IPCC) out­lined the need to reduce glob­al green­house gas emis­sions by 45% (from 2010 levels) by 2030, and achieve net zero emis­sions by 2050¹. It states that these reduc­tions are neces­sary in order to lim­it the increase in glob­al mean tem­per­at­ure to 1.5°C rel­at­ive to pre-indus­tri­al levels. This is the more ambi­tious tar­get of the Par­is Agree­ment by the parties to the UN Frame­work Con­ven­tion on Cli­mate Change (UNFC­CC); it is also under­stood to be a safer” warm­ing lim­it both for soci­et­ies and eco­sys­tems glob­ally. In 2019, the UK Gov­ern­ment agreed to a leg­ally bind­ing tar­get of net zero green­house gas emis­sions by 2050.

Sub­sequently, the IPCC pub­lished its Sixth Assess­ment Report (AR6) in stages, with the final volume released in March 2022. Com­piled by the world’s lead­ing sci­ent­ists, this report provides a com­pre­hens­ive update on the latest sci­entif­ic learn­ings about cli­mate change, and is inten­ded to serve as a resource for glob­al cli­mate nego­ti­ations, nation­al policies and busi­ness planning.

The first part of the AR6, entitled Cli­mate Change 2021: The Phys­ic­al Sci­ence Basis”, was released ahead of the 26th UNFC­CC Con­fer­ence of the Parties (COP26) hos­ted in Glas­gow in Novem­ber 2021². Not­ably, it affirms that the increase of car­bon diox­ide, meth­ane, and nitrous oxide in the Earth’s atmo­sphere through the indus­tri­al era, i.e. since the late 19th cen­tury, is the res­ult of human activ­it­ies. What is clear in the report is that our chance of lim­it­ing the increase in glob­al mean tem­per­at­ure to 1.5°C above pre-indus­tri­al levels now appears small. Keep­ing warm­ing below the safer” 1.5°C lim­it will likely require the most ambi­tious actions – i.e. those at the top end of known tech­nic­al feas­ib­il­ity – to reduce emis­sions and also upscale efforts on car­bon sequestration.

The Depart­ment of Busi­ness, Energy and Indus­tri­al Strategy (BEIS) is the lead for report­ing on GHG emis­sions in line with the UNFC­CC require­ments in the UK, includ­ing Scot­land and Wales. An

¹ IPCC (2018) Spe­cial Report: Glob­al Warm­ing of 1.5°C Sum­mary for Poli­cy­makers.” https://​www​.ipcc​.ch/​s​r​15​/​c​h​a​p​t​e​r​/spm/. ² IPCC (2021) Cli­mate Change 2021: The Phys­ic­al Sci­ence Basis https://​www​.ipcc​.ch/​r​e​p​o​r​t​/​s​i​x​t​h​-​a​s​s​e​s​s​m​e​n​t​-​r​e​p​o​r​t​-​w​o​r​k​i​n​g​-​g​roup- i/​. 13

SMALL WORLDCON­SULT­ING inde­pend­ent body, the UK Cli­mate Change Com­mit­tee, advises the whole of the UK, includ­ing devolved admin­is­tra­tions, on emis­sions tar­gets and pro­gress. The Sixth Car­bon Budget (2020) recom­mends that the UK set a budget to require a 78% reduc­tion in UK green­house gas emis­sions by 2035 rel­at­ive to 1990, which is a 63% reduc­tion from 2019 levels³. Fur­ther detail relat­ing to this is provided in Sec­tion 2.4 out­lining asso­ci­ated real-world change towards decarbonisation.

The Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment pub­lished its Update to the Cli­mate Change Plan 2018 – 2032: Secur­ing a Green Recov­ery on a Path to Net Zero” in Decem­ber 2020. The doc­u­ment sets out the new ambi­tious tar­gets to end Scotland’s con­tri­bu­tion to cli­mate change by 2045 (net zero), and a com­mit­ment to reduce emis­sions by 75% by 2030 (com­pared with 1990). Recog­nising the role that both pub­lic and private invest­ment must play in deliv­er­ing the trans­ition to net zero emis­sions, the Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment launched the first tranche of its £2 bil­lion Low Car­bon Fund4.

Ahead of COP26, in Octo­ber 2021, the UK Gov­ern­ment pub­lished its Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Green­ers. This out­lines the Government’s strategy to reduce emis­sions across the eco­nomy, includ­ing power, fuel sup­ply and hydro­gen, industry, heat and build­ings, trans­port, waste, and green­house gas removals. It also con­siders sup­port­ing the wider trans­ition across the economy.

COP26 con­cluded with the agree­ment of the Glas­gow Cli­mate Pact, with 153 coun­tries put­ting for­ward new 2030 emis­sions tar­gets (“Nation­ally Determ­ined Con­tri­bu­tions”, NDCs). The NDCs pledged at COP26 are estim­ated to rep­res­ent a tra­ject­ory towards a tem­per­at­ure rise of 2.4°C (rel­at­ive to pre-indus­tri­al levels) by the end of the cen­tury, where­as the exist­ing Net Zero pledges, if fully imple­men­ted, would lim­it glob­al warm­ing to 1.8°C.7

Pri­or to COP26 clos­ing on the 13th of Novem­ber, the UK’s Envir­on­ment Act 2021 received Roy­al Assent, becom­ing law on the 9th of Novem­ber 2021 as an Act of Par­lia­ment. The broad aims of the UK Envir­on­ment Act are to improve air and water qual­ity, pro­tect wild­life, increase recyc­ling and reduce plastic waste. The Act also provides the means to set tar­gets for par­tic­u­late mat­ter (affect­ing the qual­ity of ambi­ent air) and spe­cies abund­ance. More import­antly, it sets envir­on­ment­al prin­ciples which the Nation­al Park Author­it­ies or Loc­al Author­it­ies for AONBs will need to be famil­i­ar with as they ful­fil their stat­utory plan­ning author­ity oblig­a­tions, namely:

• The prin­ciple that envir­on­ment­al pro­tec­tion should be integ­rated into poli­cy­mak­ing, • The prin­ciple of pre­vent­at­ive action to avert envir­on­ment­al dam­age, • The pre­cau­tion­ary prin­ciple, inso­far as it relates to the envir­on­ment, • The prin­ciple that envir­on­ment­al dam­age should, as a pri­or­ity, be rec­ti­fied at source, • The pol­luter pays” principle.

³ Cli­mate Change Com­mit­tee (2020): The Sixth Car­bon Budget: The UK’s Path to Net Zero,” p. 13 https://​www​.thec​cc​.org​.uk/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2020​/​12​/​T​h​e​-​S​i​x​t​h​-​C​a​r​b​o​n​-​B​u​d​g​e​t​-​T​h​e​-​U​K​s​-​p​a​t​h​-​t​o​-​N​e​t​-​Z​e​r​o.pdf. ⁴ Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment (2020) Secur­ing a green recov­ery on a path to net zero: cli­mate change plan 2018 – 2032 — update p.1 ⁵ HM Gov­ern­ment (2021), Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Green­er” https://​www​.gov​.uk/​g​o​v​e​r​n​m​e​n​t​/​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​n​e​t​-​zero- strategy. ⁶ COP26, The Glas­gow Cli­mate Pact,” p.8 https://​ukcop26​.org/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2021​/​11​/​C​O​P​26​-​P​r​e​s​i​d​e​n​c​y​-​O​u​t​c​o​m​e​s​-The- Climate-Pact.pdf. ⁷ https://​cli​mate​ac​tion​track​er​.org/​g​l​o​b​a​l​/​t​e​m​p​e​r​a​t​ures/. 14

SMALL WORLD2.2. Health impacts of air pol­lu­tion CON­SULT­ING In addi­tion to the impact of cli­mate change on the envir­on­ment, green­house gas emis­sions also have an impact on human health and well-being. It is estim­ated that between 28,000 and 36,000 UK deaths each year are attrib­ut­able to air pol­lu­tion. Poor air qual­ity can have a dis­pro­por­tion­ate impact on the health and well-being of chil­dren, older people and oth­er vul­ner­able indi­vidu­als. The NHS has iden­ti­fied that more than 2,000 GP prac­tices and 200 hos­pit­als are in loc­al­it­ies affected by tox­ic air. In the UK, 5.4 mil­lion people are cur­rently receiv­ing treat­ment for asthma: 1.1 mil­lion chil­dren (1 in 11) and 4.3 mil­lion adults (1 in 12). Every day, three fam­il­ies are dev­ast­ated by the death of a loved one due to an asthma attack, and tra­gic­ally, two thirds of these deaths are pre­vent­able (Asthma UK2020).

Almost 16% of pre­vent­able deaths in Scot­land, com­pared to 30% in Eng­land, due to non- com­mu­nic­able dis­eases can be spe­cific­ally attrib­uted to air pol­lu­tion (NHS Plan, 2019). While cit­ies in Scot­land have lower levels of par­tic­u­late pol­lu­tion than many in Eng­land, dan­ger­ous levels are still reached⁹.

2.3. Cli­mate-driv­en impacts in the UK

The impact of cli­mate change on our nat­ur­al world is evid­enced by high­er tem­per­at­ures, chan­ging rain­fall pat­terns, changes in eco­sys­tems, sea level rise, increas­ing fre­quency and intens­ity of storm surges, retreat­ing gla­ciers, and melt­ing sea ice and ice sheets. In the UK we are see­ing sig­ni­fic­ant changes in the winter and sum­mer rain­fall pat­terns. The UK Met Office’s latest report states that Win­ters in the UK, for the most recent dec­ade (20092018), have been on aver­age 5% wet­ter than 1981 – 2010 and 12% wet­ter than 19611990”, and that Sum­mers in the UK have also been wet­ter, by 11% and 13% respectively”10. Total rain­fall from extremely wet days increased by around 17% in the dec­ade 2008 – 2017 for the UK as a whole. How­ever, the changes are most marked for Scot­land, and not sig­ni­fic­ant for most of south­ern and east­ern Eng­land. In addi­tion to increas­ing pre­cip­it­a­tion volumes, cli­mate change has already made it 12 – 25% more likely that the UK will again exper­i­ence a sum­mer as hot as 2018, which is pro­jec­ted to become 50% more likely with future warming.

In

×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!