Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

Item6 WildlifePondsCommitteeReport 20250335DET

Com­mit­tee report

Devel­op­ment proposed: Form­a­tion of 10 wild­life ponds at Site at Knock House, Strath­gir­noc, Birkhall, Ballater

Ref­er­ence: 2025/0335/DET Applic­ant: Timothy Coleshow, Brit­ish Dragon­fly Soci­ety Date called-in: 23 Decem­ber 2025 Recom­mend­a­tion: Approve Case officer: Kath­er­ine Don­nach­ie, Plan­ning Officer


Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 2 of 21

Map show­ing site locations.

(Data source: CNPA Crown copy­right and data­base rights 2026. Ord­nance Sur­vey AC0000821810 OS licensed col­our ras­ter MM (NG): Built envir­on­ment CNP: CNPA ©Crown copy­right and data­base rights 2023 OS 160040965 OS licensed col­our MM (NG): The rep­res­ent­a­tion of fea­tures or bound­ar­ies in which CNPA or oth­ers have an interest does not neces­sar­ily imply their true pos­i­tions. For fur­ther inform­a­tion please con­tact the appro­pri­ate author­ity. Brochdhu Fire Tower R Mill of Ster­in All­t­cailleach Forest) This map has been pro­duced to aid in the stat­utory pro­cess of deal­ing with plan­ning applic­a­tions. The map is to help identi­fy the site and its sur­round­ings and to aid Plan­ning Officers, Com­mit­tee Mem­bers and the Pub­lic in the determ­in­a­tion of the pro­pos­al. Maps shown in the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Report can only be used for the pur­poses of the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee. Any oth­er use risks infringing Crown Copy­right and may lead to pro­sec­u­tion or civil pro­ceed­ings. Maps pro­duced with­in this Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Report can only be repro­duced with the express per­mis­sion of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity and oth­er Copy­right hold­ers. This per­mis­sion must be gran­ted in advance.


Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 3 of 21

Site descrip­tion, pro­pos­al and history

Site descrip­tion

  1. The applic­a­tion cov­ers a num­ber of sites to the west of Bal­later at six sep­ar­ate loc­a­tions to the north and south of the B976 back road from Bal­later to Crath­ie which runs to the south of the River Dee. All the sites are loc­ated on the Abergel­die Estate on rough or wet grassland.
  2. The pro­posed wild­life ponds are not loc­ated on any des­ig­nated sites. Two of the pond sites are closer to the River Dee Spe­cial Area of Con­ser­va­tion (SAC) but are out­with this site. The Cairngorms Mas­sif Spe­cial Pro­tec­tion Area (SPA) lies fur­ther west. There is a cat­egory B lis­ted build­ing of archi­tec­tur­al and his­tor­ic import­ance at Mill of Cosh in the vicin­ity of where three of the pond sites are located.
  3. All of the pro­posed pond sites are accessed by exist­ing tracks from the pub­lic road which serve oth­er properties.

Pro­pos­al

  1. The draw­ings and doc­u­ments asso­ci­ated with this applic­a­tion are lis­ted below and are avail­able on the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity web­site unless noted oth­er­wise: https://​www​.eplan​ningcnpa​.co​.uk/​o​n​l​i​n​e​-​a​p​p​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​a​p​p​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​D​e​t​a​i​l​s​.​d​o​?​a​c​t​i​v​e​T​a​b​=​d​o​c​u​m​e​n​t​s​&​k​e​y​V​a​l​=​T​7​D​A​4​S​S​I​0CP00
TitleDraw­ing Num­berDate on Plan*Date Received
Plan — Loc­a­tion Plan — Loc­a­tion of Pro­posed Ponds16/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Ponds 1 & 216/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 316/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 416/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 516/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 616/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 716/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 816/12/25

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 4 of 21

TitleDraw­ing Num­berDate on Plan*Date Received
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 916/12/25
Plan — Site Plan — Pond 1016/12/25
Plan — Pond Dimen­sions Sketch16/12/25
Plan — Pond Profiles16/12/25
Plan — Deeside North­ern Dam­sel­fly Connections16/12/25
Plan — A1 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A2 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A3 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A4 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A5 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A6 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A7 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A8 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A8 (and A9) New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Plan — A10 New Pond Site Drawing16/12/25
Oth­er — Aer­i­al View — Photo — A1, A2, and A329/12/25
Oth­er — Aer­i­al View — Photo — A429/12/25
Oth­er — Aer­i­al View — Photo — A529/12/25
Oth­er — Aer­i­al View — Photo — A6 and A729/12/25
Oth­er — Aer­i­al View — Photo — A8 and A929/12/25
Oth­er — Aer­i­al View — Photo — A1029/12/25

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 5 of 21

TitleDraw­ing Num­berDate on Plan*Date Received
Oth­er — North­ern dam­sel­fly Pond Pro­ject Description16/12/25
Oth­er — Eco­lo­gic­al and His­tor­ic Envir­on­ment Report for Abergel­die Ponds 202516/12/25

*Where no spe­cif­ic day of month has been provided on the plan, the sys­tem defaults to the 1st of the month.

  1. This applic­a­tion seeks full plan­ning per­mis­sion to form 10 sep­ar­ate ponds as part of a pro­ject to provide a net­work of more than 100 ponds for the rare north­ern dam­sel­fly across the Nation­al Park from Brae­mar to Aboyne along the River Dee cor­ridor. This will con­nect exist­ing known sites for dam­sel­fly and cre­ate new hab­it­at for them, provid­ing resi­li­ence for them in the face of cli­mate change. The applic­ants advise that North­ern dam­sel­fly is at threat due to its restric­ted dis­tri­bu­tion and because of cli­mate change dry­ing out ponds. They note that a tri­al pro­ject in Strath­spey saw col­on­isa­tion of new ponds. Con­sequently, they see the cre­ation of a net­work of new ponds as a quick, easy and inex­pens­ive way to provide new hab­it­at for a range of spe­cies whilst also provid­ing a simple wet­land net­work in the landscape.
  2. The ponds are small in scale, each around 150 square metres with approx­im­ate dimen­sions of 15 metres by 10 metres. They will be irreg­u­larly shaped to suit the loc­al land­scape. The centre of the pond will be around 1.2 to 1.5 metres deep, with the pond edges around 0.3 to 0.5 metres deep as north­ern dam­sel­fly prefer sedge filled edges of ponds in water of this depth. They will be formed essen­tially by dig­ging a hole in the ground and will then fill nat­ur­ally with water, with no con­nec­tions to water­courses and no infra­struc­ture such as dams, liners, or embank­ments required. No mater­i­al will be impor­ted into the site, and they will be loc­ated on areas with damp veget­a­tion, in depres­sions or below the break of a slope to help ensure they fill with water naturally.
  3. The ponds will be con­struc­ted using an 8T excav­at­or or sim­il­ar on wide tracks and low ground pres­sure to reduce dam­age to veget­a­tion, with all sites accessed via exist­ing tracks and roads through­out the estate. It is pro­posed to build the ponds in the autumn through to early spring to allow them to fill with water nat­ur­ally and

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 6 of 21

to avoid the bird breed­ing sea­son. The landown­er, Abergel­die Estate, is sup­port­ive of the pro­ject and has been involved in the selec­tion of sites.

  1. A total of ten ponds is pro­posed as fol­lows. Plans of the pro­pos­als are attached as Appendix 1: a) Three ponds in the vicin­ity of Knock House to the south of the B976 pub­lic road, accessed through the road­side fields. These ponds are loc­ated in a low lying area of marshy rush land at the bot­tom of these fields. b) One pond at Bal­hal­loch Cot­tage, accessed via an exist­ing track lead­ing past this estate cot­tage. This site lies to the north of the pub­lic road and to the imme­di­ate south of the River Dee. It is situ­ated in a nat­ur­al gap in the wood­land. The pro­posed pond will be loc­ated suf­fi­ciently dis­tant from the trees to avoid any dam­age dur­ing con­struc­tion, with no trees to be removed. c) Three ponds at Mill of Cosh to the south of the pub­lic road, accessed via an exist­ing track. These three ponds will be loc­ated on rough marshy ground to the south­w­est of the exist­ing cat­egory B lis­ted mill com­plex. d) Two ponds at Dalrad­die House loc­ated to the north of the pub­lic road and tak­ing access via a long track to Dalrad­die House itself. The ponds are loc­ated on rough ground to the north of the prop­erty, with this land sur­roun­ded by wood­land. The River Dee lies to the north bey­ond the wood­land. e) One pond at Khantore to the south of the pub­lic road along a track which serves a num­ber of oth­er estate prop­er­ties includ­ing Khantore Cot­tage. The site is loc­ated at the foot of an embank­ment on a depres­sion in rough ground and will be accessed from the track to the west via the flat­ter part of the field here.
  2. A num­ber of sup­port­ing doc­u­ments have been sub­mit­ted as follows:
  3. Pro­ject Descrip­tion – out­lines the his­tory, design and rationale for the pro­ject. It also high­lights that the sur­vey work found that there were no pri­or­ity hab­it­ats, pro­tec­ted spe­cies or ground water depend­ent ter­restri­al eco­sys­tems on any of the sites. It notes that a search of His­tor­ic Envir­on­ment Records high­lighted that the ponds are all over 30 metres from any archae­olo­gic­al fea­tures. His­tor­ic Envir­on­ment maps are included with the submission.

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 7 of 21

  1. Eco­lo­gic­al and His­tor­ic Envir­on­ment Report – includes a pro­tec­ted spe­cies sur­vey of the site and NVC sur­vey. The only pro­tec­ted spe­cies noted was a vivi­par­ous liz­ard. Peat prob­ing was car­ried out to ensure sites avoided any areas of deep peat.

His­tory

  1. There is no plan­ning his­tory on the sites.

Hab­it­ats reg­u­la­tions appraisal

  1. It is not con­sidered that the pro­posed devel­op­ment is likely to have a sig­ni­fic­ant impact upon a des­ig­nated European Site, as out­lined below in the com­ments of the Park Authority’s Eco­logy Officer. Con­sequently, a Hab­it­ats Reg­u­la­tions Apprais­al (HRA) is not required in this case.

Devel­op­ment plan context

Policies

Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) Scot­land 2045 (Policies rel­ev­ant to the assess­ment of this applic­a­tion are marked with a cross (x))

Nation­al policyPolicy
Policy 1Tack­ling the cli­mate and nature crisesx
Policy 2Cli­mate mit­ig­a­tion and adaptationx
Policy 3Biod­iversityx
Policy 4Nat­ur­al placesx
Policy 5Soilsx
Policy 6Forestry, wood­land and treesx
Policy 7His­tor­ic assets and placesx
Policy 8Green belts
Policy 9Brown­field, vacant and derel­ict land, and empty buildings
Policy 11Energy
Policy 12Zero waste
Policy 13Sus­tain­able transport
Policy 14Design, qual­ity and placex
Policy 15Loc­al liv­ing and 20 minute neighbourhoods

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 8 of 21

PolicyQual­ity homes
Policy 16Qual­ity homes
Policy 17Rur­al homes
Policy 18Infra­struc­ture first
Policy 19Heat­ing and cooling
Policy 20Blue and green infrastructurex
Policy 21Play, recre­ation and sport
Policy 22Flood risk and water management
Policy 23Health and safety
Policy 24Digit­al infrastructure
Policy 25Com­munity wealth building
Policy 26Busi­ness and industry
Policy 27City, town, loc­al and com­mer­cial centres
Policy 28Retail
Policy 29Rur­al development
Policy 30Tour­ism
Policy 31Cul­ture and creativity
Policy 32Aquacul­ture
Policy 33Min­er­als

Stra­tegic policy Cairngorms Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan 2022 – 2027

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan (2021) (Policies rel­ev­ant to the assess­ment of this applic­a­tion are marked with a cross (x))

Loc­al plan policyPolicy
Policy 1New hous­ing development
Policy 2Sup­port­ing eco­nom­ic growth
Policy 3Design and placemakingx
Policy 4Nat­ur­al heritagex
Policy 5Land­scapex
Policy 6The sit­ing and design of digit­al com­mu­nic­a­tions equipment
Policy 7Renew­able energy
Policy 8Open space, sport and recreation
Policy 9Cul­tur­al heritagex
Policy 10Resourcesx

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 9 of 21

PolicyDeveloper oblig­a­tions
Policy 11Developer oblig­a­tions
  1. All new devel­op­ment pro­pos­als require to be assessed in rela­tion to policies con­tained in the adop­ted Devel­op­ment Plan which com­prises Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) and the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2021. The full word­ing of policies can be found at: https://www.gov.scot/publications/national-planning-framework‑4/documents/ and at: https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2021​/​03​/​C​N​P​A​-​L​D​P​-​2021​-​w​e​b.pdf

Plan­ning guidance

  1. Sup­ple­ment­ary guid­ance also sup­ports the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan and provides more details about how to com­ply with the policies. Guid­ance that is rel­ev­ant to this applic­a­tion is marked with a cross (x).
PolicyGuid­ance
Policy 1Hous­ing sup­ple­ment­ary guidance
Policy 2Sup­port­ing eco­nom­ic growth non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 3Design and place­mak­ing non-stat­utory guidancex
Policy 4Nat­ur­al her­it­age non-stat­utory guidancex
Policy 5Land­scape non-stat­utory guidancex
Policy 7Renew­able energy non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 8Open space, sport and recre­ation non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 9Cul­tur­al her­it­age non-stat­utory guidancex
Policy 10Resources non-stat­utory guidancex
Policy 11Developer oblig­a­tions sup­ple­ment­ary guidance

Con­sulta­tions

  1. A sum­mary of the main issues raised by con­sul­tees now follows:
  2. Aber­deen­shire Coun­cil Archae­ology team has no comments.

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 10 of 21

  1. Aber­deen­shire Coun­cil Flood Risk Man­age­ment team advise that con­sid­er­ing the nature of the applic­a­tion and the loc­a­tion of the pro­posed ponds they are gen­er­ally sat­is­fied with the proposals.
  2. Aber­deen­shire Coun­cil Con­tam­in­ated Land Team has been con­sul­ted and no com­ments have been received at the time of writing.
  3. Aber­deen­shire Coun­cil Nat­ur­al Envir­on­ment Team note that they wel­come this valu­able pro­ject to assist a region­ally import­ant spe­cies. They accept the con­clu­sions of the eco­logy sur­veys and note that work will be timed to avoid the bird breed­ing sea­son. They also note that work should be con­di­tioned to accord with the eco­logy sur­veys. Finally, they advise that although some of the ponds are loc­ated close to des­ig­nated sites, none are with­in the des­ig­nated sites whereby there is no require­ments to con­sult NatureScot.
  4. Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Eco­logy Officer has con­sidered the applic­a­tion in rela­tion to the impacts on des­ig­nated sites. It is con­sidered that a Hab­it­at Reg­u­la­tions Apprais­al is not required giv­en that no con­struc­tion activ­ity will take place with­in des­ig­nated sites, the pro­posed ponds are isol­ated from the water­courses which con­nect to the River Dee SAC, and the pro­ject involves only small-scale con­struc­tion work aimed at deliv­er­ing eco­lo­gic­al enhancement.
  5. The officer fur­ther notes that no trees will be felled, and that small birch and wil­low sap­lings (under 1 metre high) are to be trans­lo­cated with­in the site of ponds 6 and 7 so that they will not be dam­aged. Accord­ingly, impacts on trees and wood­land hab­it­ats will be negligible.
  6. The sub­mit­ted hab­it­ats and pro­tec­ted spe­cies sur­veys found lim­ited evid­ence of pro­tec­ted spe­cies. How­ever, there is poten­tial for pro­tec­ted spe­cies such as rep­tiles to be present when con­struc­tion starts, so it is recom­men­ded that pre-con­struc­tion site checks be car­ried out to reduce the risk of any harm. A breed­ing bird sur­vey has not been car­ried out and hab­it­ats at all of the pond sites are con­sidered to be suit­able for a range of spe­cies. Impacts can be mit­ig­ated by tim­ing of works to avoid the bird breed­ing sea­son as pro­posed by the applicants.

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 11 of 21

  1. With regard to pri­or­ity hab­it­ats and spe­cies, the officer notes that the pro­posed devel­op­ment will dir­ectly sup­port the estab­lish­ment of pop­u­la­tions of north­ern dam­sel­fly, which is a pri­or­ity spe­cies. This will cre­ate sig­ni­fic­ant pos­it­ive effects for the dam­sel­fly, wider biod­iversity and the deliv­ery of a land­scape scale nature net­work. In terms of impacts on peat­land hab­it­ats and car­bon rich soils it is noted that peat sur­vey tech­niques have been used to micro site the ponds away from deep peat and the design of the ponds avoids lin­ear con­nec­ted fea­tures that could drain sur­round­ing shal­low peat depos­its so redu­cing any impacts on these habitats.
  2. With regard to the water envir­on­ment, there will be no con­struc­tion activ­ity with­in the water­course or with­in exist­ing per­man­ent wet­land hab­it­ats. Poten­tial con­struc­tion stage impacts will there­fore be lim­ited. How­ever invas­ive non-nat­ive spe­cies (INNS) were not men­tioned in the sur­vey work and the spread of such spe­cies between sites could have poten­tial for impacts.
  3. These mat­ters can all be addressed by appro­pri­ate plan­ning con­di­tions in the event of the applic­a­tion being sup­por­ted. Finally, with regard to biod­iversity enhance­ments, it is noted that this is the main object­ive of the pro­posed devel­op­ment with the pro­mo­tion of eco­lo­gic­al interest being integ­ral to it.
  4. Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Land­scape Adviser advises that the pro­posed devel­op­ment would change the land­scape char­ac­ter in a way that would fit with the spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies and the key land­scape char­ac­ter­ist­ics of the sites and wider area.
  5. It is noted that the con­struc­tion peri­od would intro­duce people, mater­i­als and machinery into the site where these are largely absent, caus­ing dis­rup­tion to the land­scape char­ac­ter and visu­al amen­ity of people using the nearby tracks and res­id­en­tial prop­er­ties. How­ever, is fur­ther noted that new access tracks would not be required, con­struc­tion meth­ods would lim­it land­scape and visu­al effects and that the con­struc­tion peri­od would be rel­at­ively short.
  6. The advisor has also noted that the shape of the ponds would be nat­ur­al­ist­ic and the ripari­an veget­a­tion that estab­lishes would be nat­ive and suited to wet ground.

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 12 of 21

It is con­sidered that the ten ponds would enhance and diver­si­fy the rur­al char­ac­ter of the Upper Deeside: Inver to Cam­bus O’ May land­scape char­ac­ter area; and the Cairngorm Nation­al Park spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of Glens and Straths, Trees, Woods and Forests.

  1. It is con­cluded that the pro­pos­al would retain the dis­tinct­ive char­ac­ter of the rur­al area and has been designed to avoid adverse effects and optim­ise oppor­tun­it­ies to enhance and improve the visu­al amen­ity and land­scape char­ac­ter of the site. There are likely to be min­im­al tem­por­ary adverse effects dur­ing the con­struc­tion peri­od but best prac­tice tech­niques would be employed to reduce, min­im­ise and mit­ig­ate these tem­por­ary impacts as appropriate.
  2. Finally, the advisor has high­lighted that fur­ther inform­a­tion will be required regard­ing tree pro­tec­tion dur­ing con­struc­tion and regard­ing road access or any areas of pub­lic access which require to be closed dur­ing construction.
  3. Bal­mor­al Estates advise that they sup­port the applic­a­tion in terms of nature res­tor­a­tion, eco­lo­gic­al bene­fits, and flood mit­ig­a­tion through reten­tion of sur­face water.
  4. Bal­later and Crath­ie Com­munity Coun­cil have advised that they sup­port this applic­a­tion. They have asked that the Dee Resi­li­ence Strategy Group are involved to give thought as to wheth­er any pos­sible modi­fic­a­tions to the scheme could res­ult in addi­tion­al bene­fits such as improve­ments to the water table and reduc­tion in flood­ing risk in addi­tion to the clear eco­lo­gic­al value of the pro­ject. A copy of the Com­munity Council’s com­ments is attached as Appendix 2.

Rep­res­ent­a­tions

  1. The applic­a­tion was advert­ised and no rep­res­ent­a­tions have been received.

Apprais­al

  1. Sec­tion 25 of the 1997 Act as amended requires applic­a­tions to be determ­ined in accord­ance with the Devel­op­ment Plan. This com­prises Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) and the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 13 of 21

2021 (LDP). Where there is con­flict between policies, NPF4 policies take precedence.

  1. The main plan­ning con­sid­er­a­tions in this case are: the prin­ciple in terms of sus­tain­ab­il­ity and cli­mate change; land­scape and design; envir­on­ment­al impacts; flood­ing; amen­ity; trans­port and out­door access; and cul­tur­al her­it­age. These are con­sidered in below.

Prin­ciple – Sus­tain­ab­il­ity and cli­mate change

  1. NPF4 Policy 1: Tack­ling the cli­mate and nature crises seeks to ensure that sig­ni­fic­ant weight is giv­en to the glob­al cli­mate and nature crises when con­sid­er­ing all devel­op­ment pro­pos­als, while NPF4 Policy 2: Cli­mate mit­ig­a­tion and adapt­a­tion seeks to encour­age devel­op­ment that adapts to the cur­rent and future impacts of cli­mate change. Sim­il­arly, LDP Policy 3: Design and Place­mak­ing requires new devel­op­ment to min­im­ise the effects on cli­mate change.
  2. In this case the pro­posed devel­op­ment seeks to cre­ate a series of wild­life ponds to help cre­ate suit­able breed­ing hab­it­at for a pri­or­ity spe­cies (north­ern dam­sel­fly) which will con­nect to exist­ing known sites for this spe­cies so help­ing to safe­guard this valu­able spe­cies in the face of cli­mate change. As noted by the envir­on­ment­al con­sul­tees, it will also help sup­port cre­ation of a func­tion­al fresh­wa­ter / wet­land nature net­work along Deeside. The works are min­im­al in terms of scale and size, will not involve the loss of agri­cul­tur­al land, and have no require­ment to import mater­i­als to cre­ate the ponds.
  3. In these cir­cum­stances the prin­ciple of the pro­posed devel­op­ment is con­sidered to read­ily sup­port the object­ives of NPF4 and LDP plan­ning policies sub­ject to the details of sit­ing and envir­on­ment­al impacts being sat­is­fact­ory which will now be considered.

Land­scape and design

  1. NPF4 Policy 4: Nat­ur­al places sets out that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als which affect a Nation­al Park will only be sup­por­ted where the object­ives of des­ig­na­tion and the over­all integ­rity of the area will not be com­prom­ised. LDP Policy 5: Land­scape sets out sim­il­ar object­ives with a pre­sump­tion against any devel­op­ment that does not

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 14 of 21

con­serve or enhance the land­scape char­ac­ter or spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park.

  1. NPF4 Policy 14: Design, qual­ity and place seeks to ensure that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als improve the qual­ity of the area and are con­sist­ent with the six qual­it­ies of suc­cess­ful places: healthy, pleas­ant, con­nec­ted, dis­tinct­ive, sus­tain­able, and adapt­able. Sim­il­arly, LDP Policy 3: Design and place­mak­ing also seeks to ensure that pro­pos­als improve the qual­ity of the area and are con­sist­ent with the six qual­it­ies of suc­cess­ful places.
  2. The scale of the pro­posed devel­op­ments is very small and will have min­im­al land­scape impacts. The choice of loc­a­tions enables the ponds to sit in the loc­al land­scape with little if any impact, being loc­ated either on marshy land or on nat­ur­al clear­ings with­in wood­land. Fur­ther­more, the loc­a­tions are visu­ally dis­crete with­in the Abergel­die Estate. The works to cre­ate the ponds are also min­im­al, with the details of the pro­posed con­struc­tion sup­port­ing nat­ur­al reve­get­a­tion of any dis­turbed areas with no import­a­tion of mater­i­als required.
  3. In these cir­cum­stances it is con­sidered that the pro­pos­al will read­ily con­serve and enhance the land­scape char­ac­ter and spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park and is con­sist­ent with all the qual­it­ies of a suc­cess­ful place. As such it is con­sidered to com­ply with rel­ev­ant NPF4 and LDP policies.

Envir­on­ment­al impacts

  1. NPF4 Policy 3: Biod­iversity requires that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als con­trib­ute to the enhance­ment of biod­iversity includ­ing, where rel­ev­ant, restor­ing degraded hab­it­ats and build­ing and strength­en­ing nature net­works and the con­nec­tions between them. NPF4 Policy 4: Nat­ur­al places does not sup­port devel­op­ment which will have an unac­cept­able impact on the nat­ur­al envir­on­ment, or which will have a sig­ni­fic­ant effect on European Site des­ig­na­tions which include Spe­cial Areas of Con­ser­va­tion and Sites of Spe­cial Sci­entif­ic Interest. NPF4 Policy 20: Blue and green infra­struc­ture sets out that devel­op­ment which incor­por­ates or enhance blue and / or green infra­struc­ture with pro­pos­als for their future man­age­ment to be included. Sim­il­arly, LDP Policy 4: Nat­ur­al her­it­age requires new devel­op­ment to have no adverse effects on the integ­rity of des­ig­nated sites, the Nation­al Park, or on pro­tec­ted spe­cies or habitats

Item 6 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 15 of 21

includ­ing those iden­ti­fied in the Cairngorms Nature Action Plan and UK Biod­iversity Action Plan. Policy 3: Design and Place­mak­ing also requires devel­op­ment to cre­ate oppor­tun­it­ies for fur­ther biod­iversity and to pro­mote eco­lo­gic­al interest.

  1. As out­lined pre­vi­ously, this application’s core pur­pose is to sup­port biod­iversity and to help cre­ate a nature net­work. As noted by the Park Authority’s Eco­logy Adviser, it has biod­iversity enhance­ment as its main object­ive, and the pro­mo­tion of eco­lo­gic­al interest is integ­ral to the design of the applic­a­tion. The pro­posed form­a­tion of a series of small wild­life ponds for North­ern Dam­sel­fly (a Cairngorms and Scot­tish Biod­iversity List Pri­or­ity Spe­cies) at mul­tiple sites along Deeside will provide suit­able breed­ing hab­it­at and will also bene­fit many oth­er aquat­ic and ter­restri­al spe­cies and increase the extent and con­nectiv­ity of fresh­wa­ter hab­it­ats in this area.
  2. In terms of the impacts of this small-scale devel­op­ment on the loc­al envir­on­ment, the Park Authority’s Eco­logy Adviser is sat­is­fied with the pro­pos­al sub­ject to appro­pri­ate plan­ning con­di­tions being attached to any plan­ning per­mis­sion relat­ing to Con­struc­tion Envir­on­ment Man­age­ment Plans, pre­con­struc­tion sur­veys and tim­ing of works to avoid the bird breed­ing sea­son. There is also not con­sidered to be an impact on the des­ig­nated site in the vicin­ity (River Dee SAC).
  3. Finally, no trees are to be felled, with exist­ing trees to be pro­tec­ted and the small trees under 1 metre high in the vicin­ity of the two ponds at Mill of Cosh to be trans­lo­cated. Con­sequently, the pro­pos­als do not con­flict with NPF4 Policy 6: Forestry, wood­land and trees which sup­ports development
×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!