Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

Item9 DorenellExtensionWindfarmCommitteeReport

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 1 of 15

Wind­farm com­mit­tee report

Devel­op­ment proposed:

Dorenell Wind Farm exten­sion – applic­a­tion under Sec­tion 36 of the Elec­tri­city Act 1989 for the con­struc­tion and oper­a­tion of an exten­sion to the exist­ing wind­farm and energy stor­age facil­ity with­in the Plan­ning Author­ity of the Moray Coun­cil, of up to 67 (three-bladed) wind tur­bines, with a range of max­im­um tip heights from 149.9 m to 250 m and asso­ci­ated infra­struc­ture, and includes Bat­tery Energy Stor­age (BESS) and asso­ci­ated infrastructure.

Con­sulta­tion from:

Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment Energy Con­sents Unit

Ref­er­ence:

ECU00004862 (CNPA ref. 2025/0202/PAC)

Applic­ant:

Dorenell Wind­farm Exten­sion Limited

Date con­sul­ted:

14 August 2025

Recom­mend­a­tion:

Object

Case officer:

Emma Bryce, Plan­ning Man­ager (Devel­op­ment Management)


Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 2 of 15

Map: Site Location

This map has been pro­duced to aid in the stat­utory pro­cess of deal­ing with plan­ning applic­a­tions. The map is to help identi­fy the site and its sur­round­ings and to aid Plan­ning Officers, Com­mit­tee Mem­bers and the Pub­lic in the determ­in­a­tion of the pro­pos­al. Maps shown in the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Report can only be used for the pur­poses of the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee. Any oth­er use risks infringing Crown Copy­right and may lead to pro­sec­u­tion or civil pro­ceed­ings. Maps pro­duced with­in this Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Report can only be repro­duced with the express per­mis­sion of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity and oth­er Copy­right hold­ers. This per­mis­sion must be gran­ted in advance.


Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 3 of 15

Pur­pose of report

  1. The pur­pose of this report is to inform the com­mit­tee decision and sub­sequent con­sulta­tion response to the Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment Energy Con­sents Unit (ECU) on an applic­a­tion sub­mit­ted under Sec­tion 36 of the Elec­tri­city Act 1989 for a pro­posed exten­sion to the Dorenell Wind­farm loc­ated to the north­east of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. The Scot­tish Gov­ern­ment are the determ­in­ing author­ity for this applic­a­tion as the out­put is more than 50MW. The applic­a­tion is accom­pan­ied by an Envir­on­ment­al Report (EIAR), which presents the find­ings of the applicant’s Envir­on­ment­al Impact Assess­ment (EIA).
  2. The plan­ning issues to be con­sidered are con­fined to the effects of the pro­posed wind­farm on the land­scape char­ac­ter and Spe­cial Land­scape Qual­it­ies (SLQs) of the Nation­al Park. All oth­er mat­ters, such as eco­logy, noise, gen­er­al amen­ity etc are assessed by the decision maker (Scot­tish Min­is­ters) with advice from stat­utory consultees.
  3. Under the cur­rent work­ing agree­ment on roles in land­scape case­work between NatureScot and the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity, NatureScot lead on the pro­vi­sion of advice on the effects on the SLQs caused by pro­pos­als out­with the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. Their advice has been used to inform this report.

Site descrip­tion and pro­posed development

  1. The site and its sur­round­ings are pre­dom­in­antly exposed heath­er moor­land with­in the hills of Black­wa­ter Forest. The site cov­ers an area of approx­im­ately 3,948 hec­tares lying approx­im­ately 10km south of Dufftown with­in the Cab­rach and Glen­fid­dich Estates. The site is loc­ated between the exist­ing Dorenell Wind Farm lying to the west, which com­prises 59 tur­bines of a max­im­um height of 126m, and undeveloped moor­land and the A941 to the east, with the Nation­al Park bound­ary approx­im­ately 300 metres to the south. Trib­u­tar­ies of the River Dever­on run through the site.
  2. The pro­posed devel­op­ment would com­prise 67 tur­bines with a max­im­um height of 149.9m to 250m to the tip of the blade in an upright pos­i­tion. 17 tur­bines will have avi­ation light­ing. The closest tur­bines would be sited approx­im­ately 0.5km from the Park’s bound­ary. The asso­ci­ated infra­struc­ture includes junc­tion works at two

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 4 of 15

loc­a­tions along the A941 provid­ing site access, access tracks and water­course cross­ings, crane and tur­bine hard­stand­ings, an onsite con­trol build­ing and sub­sta­tion com­pound, a bat­tery energy stor­age facil­ity, under­ground cabling, an anem­o­met­er mast of up to 110m, tem­por­ary con­struc­tion com­pounds, lay­down area, batch­ing plant and poten­tial excav­a­tions / bor­row workings.

  1. The­or­et­ic­al vis­ib­il­ity of the pro­posed wind­farm from with­in the Nation­al Park is shown by the applicant’s EIAR fig­ure 5.2a (Appendix 1). When con­sid­er­ing cumu­lat­ive visu­al effects, the applicant’s Fig­ure 5.3c Cumu­lat­ive Zones of The­or­et­ic­al Vis­ib­il­ity (ZTV) (Appendix 2) demon­strates the vis­ib­il­ity of the pro­posed wind­farm and the exist­ing Dorenell Wind Farm loc­ated to the west of the site. The pale blue areas show the increase in vis­ib­il­ity of wind tur­bines with the intro­duc­tion of the pro­posed Dorenell Wind Farm exten­sion and the purple areas cumu­lat­ively with the exist­ing Dorenell Wind Farm.
  2. Visu­al­isa­tions from 17 view­points have been provided in the applicant’s EIAR to demon­strate the pre­dicted level of vis­ib­il­ity that would be had from with­in / on the bound­ary of the Nation­al Park – refer to Appendix 1 (Fig­ure 5.2a Blade Tip ZTV with View­points) for the loc­a­tions: a) VP1: Cre­ag an Sgor b) VP3: Little Geal Charn c) VP6: Minor Road near Badenyon d) VP7: Minor road between Coull of Newe and Glen Buchat e) VP9: Glen­buchat Castle f) VP10: Carn Mor in the Lad­der Hills g) VP11: Ben Newe h) VP12: Com­munity Hall, Braes of Glen­liv­et i) VP13a: Tom Trum­per­n­ear Col­lege of Scalan j) VP13b: Tom Trump­er Sum­mit k) VP16: Carn Daimh, Spey­side Way l) VP17: Tomin­toul m) VP19: Cairn­agour Hill n) VP20: Cre­agan a Chaise in the Hills of Crom­dale o) VP23: Ben Avon p) VP24: Cairngorm

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 5 of 15

q) VP25: Lochnagar

  1. Com­mit­tee mem­bers should famil­i­ar­ise them­selves with the above visu­al­isa­tions online before the meet­ing. The visu­al­isa­tions asso­ci­ated with each view point are avail­able to the pub­lic by search­ing the applic­a­tion doc­u­ments on the Energy Con­sents Unit web­site for the rel­ev­ant fig­ures with­in the EIAR — Volume 3, Fig­ure 5.11 to Fig­ure 5.36.

Rel­ev­ant plan­ning history

  1. August 2023 – the Park Author­ity respon­ded to a scop­ing con­sulta­tion from ECU for the cur­rent application.

Plan­ning policy context

  1. The pro­posed devel­op­ment is loc­ated wholly out­with the Nation­al Park and there­fore the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan policies do not apply. How­ever, an assess­ment of the pro­pos­al must be made in accord­ance with Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) and have regard to the Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan (NPPP).

Nation­al policy

  1. Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) sets out nation­al plan­ning policies that reflect Scot­tish Min­is­ters’ pri­or­it­ies for the devel­op­ment and use of land, as well as for oper­a­tion of the plan­ning sys­tem. It also iden­ti­fies a series of nation­al devel­op­ments’. The con­tent of NPF4 forms the nation­al ele­ment of the stat­utory devel­op­ment plan, which also includes the rel­ev­ant Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan. Decisions on plan­ning applic­a­tions (and Sec­tion 36 applic­a­tions) are to be made in accord­ance with the devel­op­ment plan, and as such NPF4.
  2. Policy spe­cific­ally relat­ing to Nation­al Parks and devel­op­ment man­age­ment can be found in NPF4 Policy 4: Nat­ur­al Places and Policy 11: Energy. In gen­er­al terms Policy 4 a) cites that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als which by vir­tue of type, loc­a­tion or scale will have an unac­cept­able impact on the nat­ur­al envir­on­ment, will not be supported.

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 6 of 15

  1. NPF4 Policy 4 c) spe­cific­ally applies to a Nation­al Park and states that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als that will affect a Nation­al Park will only be sup­por­ted where: i. The object­ives of des­ig­na­tion and the over­all integ­rity of the area will not be com­prom­ised; or ii. Any sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on the qual­it­ies for which the area has been des­ig­nated are clearly out­weighed by social, envir­on­ment­al or eco­nom­ic bene­fits of nation­al importance.”
  2. NPF4 Policy 4 c) makes clear that the policy test applies where devel­op­ment pro­pos­als may affect a nation­ally des­ig­nated land­scape and so can be applied to devel­op­ment pro­pos­als out­with the Nation­al Park bound­ary but poten­tially affect­ing it.
  3. Of rel­ev­ance to the gen­er­a­tion of wind energy devel­op­ment nation­ally and there­fore to the pro­posed devel­op­ment, NPF4 Nation­al Devel­op­ment 3 Stra­tegic Renew­able Elec­tri­city Gen­er­a­tion and Trans­mis­sion Infra­struc­ture’ con­firms that this class of nation­al devel­op­ment sup­ports renew­able elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion, repower­ing and expan­sion of the elec­tri­city grid. It incor­por­ates three types of devel­op­ment, includ­ing on and off­shore elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion, includ­ing elec­tri­city stor­age, from renew­ables exceed­ing 50 mega­watts capa­city. The Dorenell Wind Farm exten­sion pro­pos­al falls with­in the scope of Nation­al Devel­op­ment 3.
  4. NPF4 Policy 11: Energy fur­ther cla­ri­fies that b) Devel­op­ment pro­pos­als for wind farms in Nation­al Parks…will not be sup­por­ted; and d) Devel­op­ment pro­pos­als that impact on inter­na­tion­al or nation­al des­ig­na­tions will be assessed in rela­tion to Policy 4”.

Stra­tegic policy

  1. The Cairngorms Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan (NPPP) 20222027 is required under sec­tion 11 of the Nation­al Parks (Scot­land) Act 2000. It is the man­age­ment plan for the Cairngorms Nation­al Park approved by Scot­tish Min­is­ters. The NPPP sets out how all those with a respons­ib­il­ity for the Nation­al Park will coordin­ate their work to tackle the most import­ant issues. There is a duty for decision makers

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 7 of 15

to have regard to the NPPP, a require­ment set out in Sec­tion 14 of the Act. As such, the NPPP is a mater­i­al con­sid­er­a­tion in plan­ning decisions.

  1. The NPPP iden­ti­fies that the land­scapes of the Nation­al Park are val­ued by many and under­pin the area’s eco­nomy. It con­tains policies to safe­guard land­scape interests. Of rel­ev­ance to wind­farm devel­op­ment pro­pos­als are policies A4 and C2 a).
  2. Policy A4 seeks to con­serve and enhance the SLQs of the Nation­al Park. Policy C2 a) seeks to sup­port devel­op­ment of a low car­bon eco­nomy and increase renew­able energy gen­er­a­tion where this is com­pat­ible with con­serving the SLQs. In rela­tion to wind­farm devel­op­ment, the policy states that large scale wind tur­bines are not com­pat­ible with the land­scape char­ac­ter or spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park. They are inap­pro­pri­ate with­in the Nation­al Park or in areas out­side the Nation­al Park where they adversely affect its land­scape char­ac­ter or spe­cial land­scape qualities”.

Con­sulta­tions

NatureScot advice

  1. In accord­ance with the NatureScot / Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity case­work agree­ment, NatureScot have provided the Park Author­ity with advice in rela­tion to the effects on the Nation­al Park of the pro­posed wind­farm, both alone and cumu­lat­ively with oth­er exist­ing and con­sen­ted wind­farms in the sur­round­ing area – see Appendix 3. This advice focusses on the effects of the pro­posed wind­farm on the SLQs of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park and is sum­mar­ised below.
  2. The pro­posed exten­sion to the Dorenell Wind Farm would be sited on the east and north facing slopes of the Cab­rach basin area in the Moray Coun­cil area just out­side the north­east­ern bound­ary of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park. The exist­ing Dorenell Wind Farm, which com­prises 59 tur­bines extend­ing to 126m blade tip height, lies imme­di­ately to the north­w­est. The pro­pos­al includes tur­bines of vary­ing blade tip heights. There would be 19 tur­bines extend­ing to 250m, with only 2 tur­bines below 150m. Although there is no detailed design rationale for the lay­out, it appears that some smal­ler tur­bines have been sited closer to the Park boundary.

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 8 of 15

Although the devel­op­ment of the pro­pos­al has gone through sev­er­al design iter­a­tions the cur­rent pro­posed large array of very large tur­bines and ancil­lary infra­struc­ture will be a sig­ni­fic­ant intru­sion from more elev­ated views loc­ated with­in the north-east­ern mar­gins of the Nation­al Park. It is con­sidered that the design strategy adop­ted for the pro­pos­al does not go far enough in its object­ive of restrict­ing vis­ib­il­ity of wind tur­bines from low-lying areas, glens and val­leys with­in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park and would also not alle­vi­ate severe intru­sion from more elev­ated views from the uplands lying on the north-east­ern edges of the Park.

  1. NatureScot advised on what SLQs should be con­sidered in the Land­scape and Visu­al Impact Assess­ment (LVIA) that accom­pan­ied the applic­a­tion. The SLQs affected are sum­mar­ised below: a) SLQ2 — Vast­ness of space, scale and height b) SLQ10 — The Sur­round­ing Hills c) SLQ28 — Wildness
  2. These SLQs relate to the char­ac­ter and qual­it­ies of the extens­ive open and rolling moor­land-covered hills in the north-east­ern part of the Nation­al Park that lie in close prox­im­ity to the pro­posed wind­farm exten­sion. Upland land­scapes extend north­wards into Moray bey­ond the bound­ary of the Park. The uplands to the north of the Park bound­ary have a more plat­eau-like land­form with the oper­a­tion­al Dorenell, Kil­drummy and Clashin­dar­roch wind farms loc­ated here. These slightly dimin­ish the open­ness and expans­ive­ness of these uplands lying out­side the Park and give them a more developed char­ac­ter than the adja­cent uplands lying with­in the Park. The pro­posed devel­op­ment would intro­duce an extens­ive array of sub­stan­tially lar­ger wind tur­bines lying much closer to the Park bound­ary. It would sig­ni­fic­antly and adversely affect the char­ac­ter and set­ting of The Sur­round­ing Hills and would dimin­ish­ing the sense of wild­ness and wide open space exper­i­enced from these uplands on the north-east­ern bound­ary of the Park.
  3. While there would be some screen­ing of the full extent of the pro­posed wind­farm devel­op­ment from lower views with­in the nearby glens of the Park, from the upper slopes, high­er ridges and sum­mits close to the north­ern bound­ary of the Park the very close prox­im­ity of very large wind tur­bines would be over­whelm­ing and would

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 9 of 15

not pre­serve a sense of space and open­ness or be per­ceived as being set back from the Park’s bound­ar­ies. Their pres­ence will increase visu­al sens­it­iv­ity from walk­ing routes with­in this area.

  1. The exist­ing wind farms which are clearly seen in views north of the Nation­al Park from the Sur­round­ing Hills reduce the mag­nitude of change that would occur on these SLQs to some degree. How­ever, the prox­im­ity and scale of devel­op­ment pro­posed would res­ult in a sig­ni­fic­ant exacer­ba­tion of exist­ing neg­at­ive effects on these SLQs in rela­tion to the char­ac­ter and per­cep­tu­al qual­it­ies asso­ci­ated with part of the Sur­round­ing Hills lying on the north­ern east­ern edge of the Park. Redesign of the Pro­posed Devel­op­ment could alle­vi­ate but not fully mit­ig­ate effects on the SLQs with­in these adja­cent uplands. a) SLQ3 — Strong jux­ta­pos­i­tion of con­trast­ing land­scapes b) SLQ4 — A Land­scape of lay­ers from inhab­ited strath to remote unin­hab­ited upland c) SLQ6 — Land­scapes both cul­tur­al and natural
  2. These SLQs prin­cip­ally relate to the settled glens of Glen­buchat and the Braes of Glen­liv­et where the pro­posed devel­op­ment would be seen on the sky­line of con­tain­ing hills at dis­tances of around 2km to 8km. Oth­er SLQs that have some rel­ev­ance to this part of the Nation­al Park include SLQ30 — Grand pan­or­a­mas and framed views, SLQ32 — Dark skies and SLQ33 — Attract­ive and con­trast­ing tex­tures. SLQ38 — The wist­ful­ness of aban­doned set­tle­ments and SLQ39 — Focal cul­tur­al land­marks of castles, dis­til­ler­ies and bridges also have some rel­ev­ance to these settled glens.
  3. Glen­buchat and the Braes of Glen­liv­et area are strongly con­tained by the sur­round­ing hills, lying on the north-east­ern edge of the Park. Both these land­scapes have a secluded and tran­quil char­ac­ter giv­en the absence of through roads. The pas­tor­al land­scapes on the settled floor and lower slopes of these glens are scen­ic­ally com­ple­men­ted by the open moor­land-clad slopes of the smoothly rolling hills which con­tain them and form the north­ern edge of the Nation­al Park. Both areas are sparsely settled with mainly small 19th cen­tury farm­steads, res­id­en­tial dwell­ings and his­tor­ic land­mark build­ings instilling a sense of time­less­ness. Little large-scale infra­struc­ture is seen from with­in the settled floor

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 10 of 15

and lower slopes of the glen / basin (a small num­ber of the oper­a­tion­al Dorenell wind tur­bines are evid­ent in views from parts of these land­scapes but do not strongly influ­ence character).

  1. The pro­posed wind­farm exten­sion would sig­ni­fic­antly affect the cul­tur­al and per­cep­tu­al qual­it­ies asso­ci­ated with these hid­den glens. Large scale infra­struc­ture would be seen in rel­at­ive prox­im­ity on the sky­line of the con­tain­ing uplands. The mag­nitude of change asso­ci­ated with the pro­posed devel­op­ment would greatly exceed the effect of exist­ing vis­ib­il­ity of the very few oper­a­tion­al Dorenell wind tur­bines seen in some parts of these land­scapes. The smooth rolling hills would be inter­rup­ted by mov­ing tur­bines, albeit seen on less visu­ally prom­in­ent dips in the upland sky­line, but non­ethe­less still intrus­ive and intro­du­cing mod­ern large-scale infra­struc­ture into the scene. The SLQs asso­ci­ated with these glens are most com­monly exper­i­enced from roads, set­tle­ment and walk­ing routes with­in the floor and lower slopes of these strongly con­tained glen / basin land­scapes where small scale build­ings, enclosed fields and the scen­ic con­trast between farm­land and the open upland back­drop is most strongly felt. More elev­ated views from nearby hills and ridges span across these quiet, little developed glen / basins but also tend to focus on wider views with­in which the dis­tant Cairngorms mas­sif is a par­tic­u­lar attraction.
  2. The aes­thet­ic qual­it­ies of SLQ3 — Strong jux­ta­pos­i­tion of con­trast­ing land­scapes and SLQ4 — A land­scape of lay­ers, from inhab­ited strath to remote, unin­hab­ited upland would be dimin­ished by the pres­ence of much more vis­ible wind tur­bines (both closer and lar­ger), detract­ing from the sim­pli­city of the sky­line of smooth, rolling hills and the con­trast­ing back­drop it provides to small scale fields and set­tle­ment. The con­trasts between the inhab­ited lower slopes and glen / basin floors and the remote undeveloped sur­round­ing hills in terms of the SLQ4 would also be adversely affected. The hid­den secret­ive char­ac­ter and dis­tinct­ive cul­tur­al asso­ci­ations of these land­scapes would be sig­ni­fic­antly dimin­ished by the intro­duc­tion of prom­in­ent wind tur­bines seen on the sky­line of hills which presently provide strong visu­al con­tain­ment to devel­op­ment out­side the Park. It is con­sidered that effects on these SLQs exhib­ited with­in Glen­buchat and the Braes of Glen­liv­et would be sig­ni­fic­ant and adverse. Redesign of the Pro­posed Devel­op­ment could mit­ig­ate these effects.

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 11 of 15

  1. To con­clude, there would be a sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effect on some of the SLQs asso­ci­ated with these hills includ­ing the sense of wild­ness and open­ness exper­i­enced from pro­moted walk­ing routes. These hills are already influ­enced to some degree by the oper­a­tion­al Dorenell and Kil­drummy wind farms and while the pro­posed devel­op­ment would sub­stan­tially increase and sig­ni­fic­antly exacer­bate exist­ing adverse effects on land­scape char­ac­ter and views, it is con­sidered these effects would not be of a level of sever­ity that would lead to a loss of integ­rity to the des­ig­nated area in terms of effects on SLQs.
  2. It is con­sidered that the mag­nitude of sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on SLQs will be great­er across Glen­buchat and the Braes of Glen­liv­et. These include sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on the cul­tur­al and per­cep­tu­al qual­it­ies asso­ci­ated with these hid­den, tran­quil and seem­ingly time­less settled glens and the dimin­ish­ment of the scen­ic jux­ta­pos­i­tion of smooth rolling hills with settled farm­land which is prin­cip­ally exper­i­enced from with­in the floor and lower slopes of these land­scapes. It is con­sidered that the degree of intru­sion of the pro­posed devel­op­ment would lead to a loss of integ­rity of the des­ig­nated area because of the mag­nitude of change that would occur to the SLQs exhib­ited in these parts of the Nation­al Park.
  3. The scale of this pro­posed devel­op­ment and its prox­im­ity to the Cairngorms Nation­al Park bound­ary would res­ult in sig­ni­fic­ant adverse land­scape and visu­al effects on the Park and on some of the SLQs evid­ent in this north-east­ern part of the des­ig­nated area. It is con­sidered that redesign of the pro­posed devel­op­ment could mit­ig­ate effects from the Glen­buchat and Braes of Glen­liv­et area. Although redesign of the pro­posed devel­op­ment could alle­vi­ate sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects from nearby hills these would be unlikely to be reduced to a non-sig­ni­fic­ant effect.
  4. In terms of NPF4 Policy 4 c) which addresses devel­op­ment affect­ing Nation­al Parks, it is con­sidered that this devel­op­ment would have a sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effect on views from the Cairngorms Nation­al Park, on its char­ac­ter and on some of the SLQs of the Park. It is con­sidered that the sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on SLQs relat­ing to the cul­tur­al and land­scape qual­it­ies of Glen­buchat and the Braes of Glen­liv­et would be suf­fi­ciently severe to affect the integ­rity of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park.

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 12 of 15

  1. It is advised that the pro­pos­al may there­fore not meet Policy 4 c) of NPF4 due to the extens­ive nature of effects on the Glen­buchat and the Braes of Glen­liv­et areas with­in the Park.
  2. It is advised that redesign­ing the pro­pos­al fol­low­ing these recom­mend­a­tions would mit­ig­ate the effects on the SLQs: a) Remov­al of tur­bines 35, 51, 55 and 57 to reduce prom­in­ence from VP7 and VP11 b) Remov­al or relo­ca­tion of tur­bine 80 so it is not vis­ible from VP6 c) Remov­al, relo­ca­tion and / or a reduc­tion in size of tur­bines 23 and 26 to reduce prom­in­ence from VP12 d) Remov­al of at least six wind tur­bines vis­ible above hub height from VP9 includ­ing tur­bine 48
  3. It is also recom­men­ded that the Applic­ant should con­sider the use of radar activ­ated light­ing to fur­ther mit­ig­ate vis­ible avi­ation lighting.

Apprais­al

  1. The policies of NPF4 and the NPPP set out how pro­pos­als out­with the bound­ary of the Nation­al Park should be con­sidered in terms of effects on the Nation­al Park.
  2. NPF4 Policy 11: Energy cla­ri­fies that b) Devel­op­ment pro­pos­als for wind farms in Nation­al Parks… will not be sup­por­ted; and d) Devel­op­ment pro­pos­als that impact on inter­na­tion­al or nation­al des­ig­na­tions will be assessed in rela­tion to Policy 4”.
  3. NPF4 Policy 4 a) cites that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als which by vir­tue of type, loc­a­tion or scale will have an unac­cept­able impact on the nat­ur­al envir­on­ment, will not be sup­por­ted. Policy 4 c) states that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als that will affect a Nation­al Park will only be sup­por­ted where: i) the object­ives of des­ig­na­tion and the over­all integ­rity of the area will not be com­prom­ised; or ii) any sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on the qual­it­ies for which the area has been des­ig­nated are clearly out­weighed by social, envir­on­ment­al or eco­nom­ic bene­fits of nation­al importance.

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 13 of 15

  1. Policy C2 a) of the NPPP sets out a test for con­sid­er­ing effects on the land­scapes of the Nation­al Park, in that large scale wind tur­bines are inap­pro­pri­ate out­side the Nation­al Park where they adversely affect its land­scape char­ac­ter or spe­cial land­scape qual­it­ies’. If a pro­pos­al fails policy C2 a), it would also be in con­flict with NPPP policy A4, which seeks to con­serve and enhance the SLQs of the Nation­al Park.
  2. The pro­posed wind farm would be loc­ated on the east and north-facing slopes of the Cab­rach basin area in the Moray Coun­cil area in close prox­im­ity to the Nation­al Park bound­ary. It would intro­duce an extens­ive array of much lar­ger wind tur­bines which would be highly vis­ible from both low lying areas and more elev­ated views, in par­tic­u­lar from the Glens of Glen­buchat and Braes of Glen­liv­et. Con­sequently, it would sig­ni­fic­antly and adversely affect the char­ac­ter and set­ting of The Sur­round­ing Hills (SLQ10) includ­ing a dimin­ish­ment of the sense of Wild­ness (SLQ28) and Vast­ness of space (SLQ2) exper­i­enced from these uplands on the north-east­ern bound­ary of the Park. The intro­duc­tion of these lar­ger and much more vis­ible wind tur­bines would detract from the simple sky­line of smooth, rolling hills and the con­trast­ing back­drop this provides to small scale fields and set­tle­ments, which in turn would reduce the aes­thet­ic qual­it­ies of SLQ3 (strong jux­ta­pos­i­tion of con­trast­ing land­scapes) and SLQ4 (land­scape of layers).
  3. The pro­pos­al would have sig­ni­fic­ant adverse effects on the SLQs of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park such that the object­ives of the des­ig­na­tion and over­all integ­rity would be com­prom­ised. The pro­posed devel­op­ment there­fore fails to meet the require­ments of NPPP policies C2 a) and A4, and NPF4 Policies 4 and 11. It is there­fore recom­men­ded that the Nation­al Park Author­ity should object to the pro­posed Dorenell Wind Farm extension.

Recom­mend­a­tion

That mem­bers of the com­mit­tee con­firm that Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity OBJECT to the applic­a­tion for the pro­posed Dorenell Wind Farm Extension.


Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 14 of 15

Appendix 1 – Dorenell Wind Farm Exten­sion: Pro­posed wind­farm ZTV and Viewpoints

Map: Pro­posed wind­farm ZTV and View­points (Appendix 1)


Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Item 9 Plan­ning Com­mit­tee 13 March 2026 Page 15 of 15

Appendix 2 — Clune Wind Farm: Cumu­lat­ive ZTV Oper­a­tion­al Dorenell Wind Farm

Map: Cumu­lat­ive ZTV Oper­a­tion­al Dorenell Wind Farm (Appendix 2)

×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!