Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

Appendix 6.4 – RSPB Scotland’s engagement record

Appendix 6.4

RSPB Scotland’s engage­ment record

RSPB Scot­land engaged with landown­ers, land man­agers and the loc­al com­munity in the dir­ect vicin­ity of Insh Marshes nature reserve.

The below table is a sum­mary of this engage­ment recor­ded by RSPB Scot­land and shared with the Park Author­ity for inclu­sion in the licence application.

Stake­hold­erNameEngage­ment typeDate of engage­mentNotes of meeting
Water­s­portsFace to face meeting25/07/2023Main con­cern was around addi­tion­al wood in the river and beavers blocking/​using the small pond area. Sees poten­tial for added value to tourism.
Res­id­ents atFace to face meeting24/07/2023Main con­cern is that they want things to stay the same. Want to be able to canoe from the house down to Loch Insh and don’t want the access track flooded due to beaver dam.
Face to face meeting26/07/2023Agreed it should be Indi­vidu­al part­ners sup­por­ted by CC. Some con­cerns about newly planted aspen in Glen Tromie
Face to face meeting24/07/2023Main con­cerns were around Golf course and planted trees. Offered to host some well organ­ised events. Would like a lot of sup­port from CNPA/​NatureScot if impacts would be high.
Videocall27/07/2023Over­all pos­it­ive, but con­cerns over Pit­main Burn. Wants the voice of loc­al crofters heard more.
FarmFace to face meeting27/07/2023Recog­nised that beavers were com­ing but appre­ci­ated the con­ver­sa­tion. Main con­cerns around vis­it­ors walk­ing down the Farr Coull track and poten­tial dis­eases to Livestock.
Kin­gussie Shinty ClubFace to face meeting15/08/2023Informed about plans and will take notes back to the club meet­ing. Feed back to CNPA.
Landown­er at KingussiePhone call24/07/2023Would come back to me for a meet­ing but nev­er did.
Landown­er at KingussieFace to face meeting08/08/2023Over­all pos­it­ive. Would be happy to have beavers on his land
Landown­er at KingussieFace to face meeting08/08/2023Only con­cern is water levels of Pit­main burn rising.
Landown­er at KingussieFace to face meeting11/08/2023Not happy with the rein­tro­duc­tion, but espe­cially with the decision being made without input from loc­al farmers.
FarmFace to face meeting02/08/2023Would like to see com­pens­a­tion for damages.
EstateFace to face meeting31/07/2023Pos­it­ive about beavers com­ing back. Will keep informed and eval­u­ate how beavers could impact the estate.
EstatePhone call and email19/07/2023Was unavail­able to talk. Did not respond to e‑mail after­wards. From oth­er e‑mail cor­res­pond­ence it is clear John has some con­cerns, but is not imme­di­ately opposed beavers being released on Insh Marshes.
EstateFace to face meeting25/07/2023Not enthu­si­ast­ic about the return of beavers. Lots of employ­ees on the estate are wor­ried about it.
Res­id­entFace to face meeting11/08/2023Happy to see beavers return.
Res­id­ents4 let­ter­boxesLeaf­let11/08/2023
RZSSFace to face meeting09/08/2023Not aware of any poten­tial issues with infrastructure
Insh Res­id­entsFace to face meeting07/08/2023Gen­er­ally pos­it­ive about beavers. Only con­cern is impact by visitors.
Insh Res­id­entsFace to face meeting10/08/2023Happy to be informed and a bit wor­ried for landown­ers near the marshes, but noth­ing against beavers.
Ten­nant farmersFace to face meeting27/08/2023Mainly con­cerned for trans­mit­table dis­eases. Don’t think it will impact them a lot.
Insh Res­id­entsFace to face meeting02/08/2023Very pos­it­ive
Insh Marshes volunteers20 indi­vidu­alsFace to face meeting02/08/2023Sup­port­ive, some ques­tions about the impacts on oth­er valu­able spe­cies and hab­it­ats on the reserve.
×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!