Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

Cairngorms National Park Authority Performance Assessment 2025

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Ügh­dar­ras Pàirc Nàiseanta a’ Mhon­aidh Ruaidh

is. improve­ment service

NATION­AL PLAN­NING IMPROVE­MENT FRAMEWORK

Per­form­ance Assessment

Cohort 3

April 2025

Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment | Improve­ment Service


Plan­ning Author­ity:Cairngorms Nation­al Park Authority
Lead officer:Dav­id Berry
Email:davidberry@​cairngorms.​co.​uk
Phone num­ber:01479 874 945

Scor­ing mat­rix used with­in this document:

Pro­gress LevelDescrip­tion
☐ 1Mak­ing excel­lent progressCon­sol­id­ate
Share learn­ing with others
☐ 2Mak­ing good progressBuild upon
Increase ambi­tion in tar­gets
Share learn­ing with others
☐ 3Mak­ing fair progressDevel­op
Increase ambi­tion in tar­gets
Review and improve implementation
☐ 4Mak­ing lim­ited progressReview
Review ambi­tion
Review approach taken
Inform NPI
Learn from others
☐ 5No pro­gressPri­or­it­ise
Pri­or­it­ise fun­da­ment­al review and revis­it approach taken.
Engage with NPI
Learn from others

Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment | Improve­ment Service


Intro­duc­tion

The Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity is delighted to share this Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment Frame­work as part of the third cohort for this pilot pro­ject led by the Improve­ment Service.

The Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment Frame­work replaces the Plan­ning Per­form­ance Frame­work reports which were pre­vi­ously sub­mit­ted to Scot­tish Min­is­ters on an annu­al basis. The Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment Frame­work aims to bet­ter meas­ure how plan­ning author­it­ies improve by incor­por­at­ing attrib­utes that bet­ter assess impacts, out­comes achieved, and the qual­ity of the ser­vice provided, and by recog­nising that plan­ning author­it­ies depend on oth­ers to deliv­er a high-qual­ity service.

As part of this Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment Frame­work, the Nation­al Park Authority’s plan­ning ser­vice has under­taken a per­form­ance assess­ment and iden­ti­fied areas for improve­ment focused on the attrib­utes of a highly per­form­ing plan­ning author­ity. These attrib­utes are grouped around the fol­low­ing five themes:

InputsPro­cessesOut­comes
PEOPLE
Has suf­fi­cient resources and skills to max­im­ise pro­ductiv­ity
Has a val­ued and sup­por­ted workforce
ENGAGE
Has good cus­tom­er care
Has effect­ive engage­ment & col­lab­or­a­tion with stake­hold­ers & communities
PLACE
Sup­ports the deliv­ery of sus­tain­able, live­able and pro­duct­ive places
Sup­ports the deliv­ery of con­sen­ted development
CUL­TURE
Has embed­ded con­tinu­ous improve­ment
Has sound gov­ernance
Has effect­ive leadership
TOOLS
Has a robust policy and evid­ence base
Makes best use of data and digit­al tech­no­logy
Has effect­ive decision-mak­ing processes

The pro­cess has also involved a peer review, includ­ing our part­ner loc­al author­ity Com­hairle nan Eilean Siar and a range of oth­er stake­hold­er rep­res­ent­at­ives. The Nation­al Park Author­ity is grate­ful for the input of every­one who par­ti­cip­ated in the peer review pro­cess to help us refine our improve­ment actions and priorities.

Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment | Improve­ment Service


People icon with text "People" below it.A high per­form­ing plan­ning author­ity needs to have the right num­ber of people to do the work expec­ted of it with the rights skills set. It also needs to have a strategy to ensure that it retains and recruits the right staff in the future. It sup­ports staff to upskill and to be pre­pared for changes in policy, legis­la­tion, and new circumstances.

People

ATTRIB­UTE 1: THIS PLAN­NING AUTHOR­ITY HAS SUF­FI­CIENT RESOURCES AND SKILLS TO MAX­IM­ISE PRODUCTIVITY

Please con­sider the fol­low­ing when think­ing about this attrib­ute and how you have per­formed over the last year:

  • Does the plan­ning author­ity have the suf­fi­cient level of staff to carry out all activ­it­ies with­in the required timeframes?
  • Does the plan­ning author­ity have the abil­ity to carry out all activ­it­ies with­in the required time­frames with its cur­rent budget?
  • Does the plan­ning author­ity have the abil­ity to carry out all activ­it­ies with­in the required time­frames with its cur­rent income?
  • Does the plan­ning author­ity received responses from con­sul­tees with­in the pre­scribed times­cale when assess­ing plan­ning applications?
  • Does the plan­ning author­ity have the abil­ity to access the appro­pri­ate advice, expert­ise, evid­ence and data it requires?

Nar­rat­ive

Back­ground to plan­ning in the Cairngorms Nation­al Park

In the Cairngorms Nation­al Park, more than in any oth­er part of Scot­land, there is a part­ner­ship approach to plan­ning. The Nation­al Park Author­ity and the five rel­ev­ant loc­al author­it­ies that cov­er the Nation­al Park¹ all play a key role in mak­ing the plan­ning sys­tem work effect­ively. The Nation­al Park Author­ity sets the plan­ning policy for the Nation­al Park through the devel­op­ment of the Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan and the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan. All plan­ning applic­a­tions in the Nation­al Park are determ­ined with ref­er­ence to this policy back­ground. Planning

¹ Aber­deen­shire Coun­cil, Angus Coun­cil, Moray Coun­cil, Perth and Kinross Coun­cil, and The High­land Council

Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment | Improve­ment Service


applic­a­tions are ini­tially sub­mit­ted to the rel­ev­ant loc­al author­ity, and they are decided by either the loc­al author­ity or the Nation­al Park Author­ity. The Nation­al Park Author­ity is noti­fied of all plan­ning applic­a­tions with­in the Nation­al Park bound­ary, and ​‘calls in’ and determ­ines the lar­ger and most sig­ni­fic­ant / sens­it­ive applic­a­tions (typ­ic­ally this accounts for just under 10% of all plan­ning applic­a­tions with­in the Nation­al Park). The rest (most of the applic­a­tions) are determ­ined by the rel­ev­ant loc­al author­ity. This unique status in com­par­is­on with oth­er plan­ning author­it­ies shapes both the struc­ture and the oper­at­ing pro­cesses of the Park Authority’s plan­ning service.

Nation­al Park Authority’s plan­ning structure

The Nation­al Park Authority’s plan­ning ser­vice sits with­in the wider Dir­ect­or­ate of Plan­ning and Place. As well as plan­ning, this includes the fol­low­ing ser­vice areas: vis­it­or ser­vices; trans­port and infra­struc­ture; out­door learn­ing and engage­ment; rangers; and Cairngorms 2030.

The plan­ning ser­vice includes the devel­op­ment man­age­ment, devel­op­ment plan­ning and plan­ning sup­port teams. The fol­low­ing sum­mar­ies provide addi­tion­al inform­a­tion on the gen­er­al activ­it­ies under­taken by each team.

The devel­op­ment plan­ning team is respons­ible for pro­du­cing the Park Authority’s Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan, as well as sup­ple­ment­ary and non-stat­utory plan­ning advice and guid­ance. In addi­tion, they provide pro­ject man­age­ment sup­port in the devel­op­ment of the Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan, which acts as the Region­al Spa­tial Strategy for the Nation­al Park (as well as the Region­al Land Use Frame­work and Eco­nom­ic / Sus­tain­able Tour­ism Strategy). The team also mon­it­ors deliv­ery of the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan’s policies and pro­pos­als, as well as sup­port­ing extern­al part­ners to devel­op Com­munity Action Plans and Loc­al Place Plans.

The devel­op­ment man­age­ment team is respons­ible for pro­cessing the plan­ning applic­a­tions which the Nation­al Park Author­ity calls-in for determ­in­a­tion, as well as provid­ing pre-applic­a­tion advice on devel­op­ment pro­pos­als that the Park Author­ity is likely to call in for determ­in­a­tion. The team also mon­it­or and resolve plan­ning enforce­ment issues for any cases in which the Park Author­ity gran­ted plan­ning per­mis­sion or, in cases where devel­op­ment is under­taken without plan­ning per­mis­sion, where the Park Author­ity would have dealt with any plan­ning applic­a­tion for that development.

The plan­ning sup­port team are respons­ible for provid­ing tech­nic­al and admin­is­tra­tion sup­port for the whole plan­ning ser­vice. They have par­tic­u­lar respons­ib­il­ity for main­tain­ing plan­ning registers, issu­ing decision notices, provid­ing sup­port for plan­ning com­mit­tee meet­ings, and mon­it­or­ing plan­ning per­form­ance indic­at­ors. In addi­tion, they co-ordin­ate with part­ners at Loch

Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment | Improve­ment Service


Lomond and the Trossachs Nation­al Park Author­ity to ensure effect­ive oper­a­tion of our plan­ning IT systems.

Staff­ing resources

A descrip­tion of the over­all arrange­ment of the Park Authority’s Plan­ning Ser­vice is provided below.

The devel­op­ment plan­ning team is man­aged by the For­ward Plan­ning and Ser­vice Improve­ment Man­ager, sup­por­ted by a Seni­or Plan­ner. The For­ward Plan­ning and Ser­vice Improve­ment Man­ager has line man­age­ment respons­ib­il­ity for the Seni­or Plan­ner and a Plan­ning Officer, whilst the Seni­or Plan­ner is respons­ible for line man­age­ment of a Gradu­ate Plan­ner and a Plan­ning Tech­nic­al Assistant.

The devel­op­ment man­age­ment team is man­aged by the Devel­op­ment Man­age­ment Man­ager, sup­por­ted by a Seni­or Plan­ner. The Devel­op­ment Man­age­ment Man­ager is respons­ible for line man­age­ment of the Seni­or Plan­ner, two Plan­ning Officers and a Plan­ning Eco­lo­gic­al Advice Officer, whilst the Seni­or Plan­ner has line man­age­ment respons­ib­il­ity for a Gradu­ate Plan­ner and a Mon­it­or­ing and Enforce­ment Officer.

The plan­ning sup­port team is man­aged by a Plan­ning Sys­tems Officer, who reports to the Devel­op­ment Man­age­ment Man­ager and has line man­age­ment respons­ib­il­ity for a Plan­ning Sup­port Officer.

The over­all plan­ning ser­vice is man­aged by the Head of Plan­ning, who since late 2024 is the Chief Plan­ning Officer for the Nation­al Park Author­ity. A restruc­ture dur­ing 2023⁄24 re-alloc­ated some of the func­tions for which the Head of Plan­ning was pre­vi­ously respons­ible in order to free up capa­city and allow the post hold­er to focus on plan­ning activ­it­ies. The func­tions that have been re-alloc­ated, which include vis­it­or ser­vices and trans­port infra­struc­ture, remain with­in the wider Plan­ning and Place Dir­ect­or­ate. This ensures that close co-oper­a­tion between these import­ant ser­vices is retained.

The table below provides a sum­mary of the num­ber of staff with­in the plan­ning ser­vice that were mem­bers of the Roy­al Town Plan­ning Insti­tute dur­ing the 2073⁄74 fin­an­cial year, includ­ing details of wheth­er they were chartered, licen­ti­ate or affil­i­ate members.

RTPI Mem­ber­ship StatusNum­ber of Staff
Chartered Mem­ber4
Licen­ti­ate Member3
Affil­i­ate Member2

Nation­al Plan­ning Improve­ment | Improve­ment Service


Over­all, the plan­ning ser­vice has a struc­ture which, when fully staffed, is effect­ive and well-designed to carry out the Park Authority’s plan­ning activ­it­ies and respons­ib­il­it­ies. How­ever, in com­mon with oth­er plan­ning author­it­ies, par­tic­u­larly in rur­al areas, the Park Author­ity exper­i­ences chal­lenges with recruit­ing appro­pri­ately qual­i­fied and exper­i­enced plan­ning pro­fes­sion­als. This some­times res­ults in vacan­cies with­in the plan­ning ser­vice being unfilled for pro­longed peri­ods, which can in turn have a bear­ing on times­cales for car­ry­ing out plan­ning activ­it­ies and respons­ib­il­it­ies. A strategy has been developed to help mit­ig­ate and address this issue, and this is dis­cussed in more detail under Attrib­ute 2 below.

Budget and finance

The Head of Plan­ning has over­all respons­ib­il­ity for plan­ning ser­vice budgets, and the budgets for the rel­ev­ant teams are also mon­itored reg­u­larly by the Devel­op­ment Man­age­ment and For­ward Plan­ning Managers.

The Nation­al Park Author­ity is able to recov­er 60% of the applic­a­tion fee from the rel­ev­ant loc­al author­ity for all plan­ning applic­a­tions that it calls in for determ­in­a­tion. Plan­ning fee income for the 2023⁄24 fin­an­cial year was £67,155. In com­mon with oth­er plan­ning author­it­ies across Scot­land, this fee income does not cov­er the full cost of pro­cessing the plan­ning applic­a­tions that the Park Author­ity deals with, and the bal­ance is there­fore met from oth­er budgets.

Plan­ning is one of the Park Authority’s two stat­utory func­tions (the Park Author­ity is also the statutory