Formal Board Paper 2 - C2030 Communities Fund - risk register
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 1 of 16
For discussion
Title: Cairngorms 2030 Communities Fund – risk register Prepared by: Eilidh Todd, Communities and Development Manager, Bridget Trussell, Community Grants Manager, David Cameron, Deputy CEO and Director of Corporate Services
Purpose
To update board members on the progress of a £1 million Cairngorms 2030 (C2030) Communities Fund, which will be co-designed by a wide range of the communities of the Cairngorms National Park, and to review the project risk register as the panel nears the end of the design phase, having met for the first time at the end of March.
Recommendations
The Board is asked to: α) Review the risk register, identify any gaps and agree the overall approach to this piece of work.
Strategic context
The development of a community-managed climate grant scheme was one of 20 core projects signed off as part of the wider C2030 programme. Specifically, the project aims to “give communities the power to co-design, fund and deliver projects that build resilience and mitigate climate impacts”.
The C2030 communities fund is also built around the three core principles set out in the C2030 Activity Plan. Specifically, it prioritises: a) Co-design – the fund is designed with, not for, our target audiences and they will feel a real sense of ownership over the outcomes. b) Widening participation – we have been proactive in ensuring that everyone has a chance to shape the C2030 communities fund, irrespective of their background or circumstances.
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 2 of 16
c) **Working in partnership** – we will seek advice and expertise from a range of partners with intimate knowledge of our target audiences, from the design of the fund itself to its wider promotion.
- In addition to the above C2030 outcomes, the communities fund also delivers on a number of Partnership Plan objectives, including: α) A1 — net zero b) B2 — wellbeing economy c) B5 — community assets and land d) B6 — new approaches to citizen participation e) B7 – community-led planning and development f) B10 – a Park for All g) C3 – housing and community benefit h) C4 – villages and town centres i) C10 – cultural heritage.
Background
At the board business session on 26 September 2025 at the Highland Wildlife Park, the Head of Communications and Engagement, and Kelly McBride, Director at the Involve Foundation, outlined our approach to the creation of a £1 million C2030 Communities Fund.
At the formal board on 28 November 2025, the Head of Communications and Engagement updated on project progress so far and presented a risk register for discussion and approval. This was subsequently updated by the Communities and Rural Development Manager at formal board on 27 March 2026.
The C2030 Communities Fund will link with other C2030 projects to give communities the power to define, design, fund and deliver projects that help achieve the aims of C2030, ie: a) Transforming the way land is managed and used to benefit nature. b) Empowering communities to shape the future of their local area. c) Making getting around the Cairngorms easier, safer and greener. d) Fostering healthier, happier communities with wellbeing at their heart.
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 3 of 16
Community groups and communities of interest (both within and outside the National Park) will be able to apply to a fund of £1 million from its launch in summer 2026 until the end of the programme in 2028. The fund has been designed by a panel of 18 representatives who live in – or have a close connection to – the National Park.
At the time of writing, the panel have so far met seven times, with a mixture of online and offline meetings. Two meetings are to be completed on 17 June and 24 June. The 24 June meeting is an additional meeting, added for final considerations of any design issues highlighted to or by the Panel as an element of risk mitigation to help ensure a viable end product from the design phase.
Throughout the process, our communications have focussed on telling the story of the panel through their own words, rather than highlighting specific decisions. This has included a various social media videos featuring interviews with panel members, and a blog piece from the Park Authority including panel member quotes.
Strategic Risk Management
In taking forward the community grants fund project within the Cairngorms 2030 programme, the Park Authority has adopted an ‘open’ risk appetite to this work. This recognises the necessary open approach to innovation and trialling new forms of citizen participation and participative democracy in developing and delivering a new community led grant fund. As an activity with ‘open’ risk appetite, the Park Authority is willing to take risk in pursuit of objectives, within limits.
The project risk register establishes the risk limits identified for the activity and presents the actions designed to mitigate risk and maintain overall exposure to risks at an acceptable level.
Next Steps
- Next steps for this piece of work across June and July include turning the panels’ recommendations into reality via grant design, a full communications launch, and animation with communities to prepare for application and decision-making processes. There is also the evaluation phase of the project.
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 4 of 16
- An update on the Panel’s design work will be presented to the board on 26 June following these Panel meetings. The project risk register, updated to reflect current risk management status, is presented in the following section of this paper. Where risks are noted as “retained”, these risk considerations will be carried forward as part of the risk management supporting the delivery phase of the project.
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 5 of 16
Risk register for the C2030 Communities Fund
- The following risk register has been developed by Park Authority officers, in collaboration with our appointed consultants Involve UK. It is designed to capture the main risks facing the Park Authority from a recruitment, delivery and reputation standpoint, plus relevant mitigation measures. This will be reviewed on a regular basis as the project progresses. Unless otherwise stated, the risk owner is the Head of Communications and Engagement. Likelihood and impact from the last update are included in brackets.
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Varying aspirations and multiple different priorities identified by co-design participants lead to ineffective or unworkable grant criteria. | Medium (Medium) | Medium (Medium) | Sizeable funds available (£1 million), with plenty of opportunities for a wide variety of projects to be funded. | This is a risk inherent in any co-design process, which is why we have appointed expert consultants to help guide us (and the panel) through this process. | |
| Training and development provided by Involve Foundation for all participants in how co-design works. | The panel are principally tasked with designing what the fund looks like at first, rather than what specific projects it will fund. This should help | |||||
| * Clear facilitation of all sessions from industry experts (Involve Foundation). | |||||
| * Participants encouraged to share ideas and perspectives in a ‘safe space’, where all viewpoints are welcome. They will also hear from third-party experts as required to help shape their decisions. | |||||
| * Transparent code of conduct agreed from the outset for all participants. |
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 6 of 16
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reduce direct conflicts between different participants / priorities. | |||||
| Update: Risk managed to date. Final design outcome to be reviewed. | |||||
| 5 | Potential conflict of interest for co-design panellists who may wish to apply for funding themselves. | Low (Low) | Medium (Medium) | Potential conflicts of interest captured at an early stage and reported transparently. | As the Cairngorms National Park has a largely remote, rural geography, we believe it would be unrealistic (and likely unhelpful) to bar co-design panellists from potentially applying for funding in future. What we will do instead is establish | |
| * Clear process developed by the panel – published in full on the Park Authority’s website – which sets out how conflicts of interest will be handled within the process they design (eg panellists absent themselves from discussions about projects they are involved in). | |||||
| * Learning from similar projects – through Involve, Park Authority-led funds and via partners such as the Cairngorms Trust – |
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 7 of 16
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| applied and fed back to co-design panellists. | clear and transparent parameters for this to take place. | ||||
| Update: Retain risk. | |||||
| 6 | Confusion between this fund and a range of other community funds (including those run by the Park Authority / Cairngorms Trust). | Medium (Medium) | Medium (Medium) | New dedicated funding opportunities section within the National Park website, bringing all funds together in one place. | How the fund sits alongside others in the landscape – and whether we will accept these as match funding for C2030 Communities Fund projects – has been a key consideration for the co-design panel and will be worked into the communications plan for the funding launch. | |
| * Single, streamlined process for all Park Authority and Cairngorms Trust-led funds, with the same grants team helping fulfil all of them. | |||||
| * We will work closely with the co-design panel to ensure the fund wording (and accompanying comms / engagement activity) is written in plain English and that what is in / out of scope is as clear as possible to potential applicants. | |||||
| * Park Authority / Cairngorms Trust’s established network of contacts will be |
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 8 of 16
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| advantageous here in terms of coordinating timings etc with other funds. | * We will also review timeframes / criteria for overlapping funds led by the Park Authority / Cairngorms Trust, eg Climate Adaptation Fund, Community Led Local Vision Fund. | ||||
| * Park Authority and Cairngorms Trust representatives will brief the co-design panel on other funds available and their criteria. | |||||
| Update: Retain risk. | |||||
| 7 | Potential for panel to be criticised for the decisions they make / if funded projects do not go according to plan. | Medium (Medium) | High (High) | At the initial stage, the co-design group will be responsible for what the fund looks like / what it would potentially fund; they will not be making decisions on exactly which projects are funded. | We will be clear in all communications around the fund exactly where the panel’s decision-making remit begins and ends. We will also field any questions about the funding | |
| * This latter decision is something that will be discussed with the co-design panel as part of their deliberations, including the pros and cons of various decision-making methods. |
Formal Board Paper 2 26 June 2026 Page 9 of 16