Item5Appendix3AGeneralComments20200009DET
CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY Planning Committee Agenda Item 5 Appendix 3A 25/06/2021 AGENDA ITEM 5 APPENDIX ЗА 2020/0009/DET REPRESENTATIONS GENERAL
Comments for Planning Application 2020/0009/DET Application Summary Application Number: 2020/0009/DET Address: Land North Of Auchroisk Cromdale Station Road Cromdale Highland Proposal: Erection of 18 houses (8 affordable) with associated drainage and road layout Case Officer: Stephanie Wade Customer Details Name: Mrs Maggie Palmer Address: 5 The Haughs Cromdale Grantown on Spey Comment Details Commenter Type: Neighbour Stance: Customer made comments neither objecting to or supporting the Planning Application Comment Reasons: Comment:My main concerns are regarding road safety and pedestrian safety. The entrance/exit from development are adjacent to the old railway bridge which gives no line of sight and a blind summit with only single vehicle access. There is no pavement or verge along this stretch of road until many metres away towards the busy A95 junction. A new footpath is planned from the development which comes out onto the access road to Sewage works at the traffic lights which do not have a pedestrian crossing function, no pavement or verge. Children have to catch the school bus from the A95 and cross an extremely busy trunk road to do so. Will the Water supply and Sewage works be able to service this size of development and the additional houses still to be built at Auchroisk Park? What about surface water from the development and possible contamination of the adjacent Balmenach Burn? The proposed application shows a Community Shop/Coffee Shop in the next phase. If this is to be a “Convenience Store” ie Coop or Spar etc these are normally supplied and services by large HGV lorries. Kirk Road is a tight turn off the A95 and unsuitable for such a vehicle.
To: Planning Support, CNΡΑ RE:2020/0009/DET Mandy Martin 2 Auchroisk Place Cromdale Grantown-on-Spey PH26 3QF 07730 985875 I am writing in respect of the above planning application, about which I have a query regarding property boundary lines, and the position of this proposed extended link path. Our property borders the new proposed link path extension which will run alongside the A95 from the traffic lights at the bridge to the existing bus stop. On viewing the drawings, it appears that the extended 2m wide path borders our property and may even encroach onto our plot. Our plot (land registry document attached) contains a ‘tree belt landscaped area’ beyond our current garden fence, however this is part of our plot. My concern is whether this path crosses into our plot, and even if this is not the case, what provision will be made to prevent members of the public straying on to our property i.e will there we a fence erected along this section of the path to ensure the properties bordering at this point remain private? T have no objection to the idea of a path along the back of our plot, I am just seeking clarity and consultation on the points raised above, and the impact on our property. Kind regards Mandy Mis Ms Mandy Martin.
83 LAND REGISTER OF SCOTLAND Officer’s ID/Date 4780 28/6/2017 ORDNANCE SURVEY NATIONAL GRID REFERENCE NJ0728 NJO2NE TITLE NUMBER MOR8049 140m Survey Scale 1/2500 The boundaries shown by dotted fees haνε been plotted from the deeds Physical boundaries will be indicabed after their delineation on the Ordnance Vap SEE SUPPLEMENTARY PLAN(S) Hlut Hah Cromdal 까 shil キ Num of Orandaly