Item5Appendix3Objection 20240226DET Dalfaber

Agenda Item 5

Appendix 3

CAIRNGORMS NATION­AL PARK AUTHOR­ITY Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Agenda Item 5 Appendix 3 24/01/2025

2024/0226/DET

Rep­res­ent­a­tions — objection

From: eplanning@​highland.​gov.​uk To: Epc Sub­ject: Com­ments for Plan­ning Applic­a­tion 24/02899/FUL Date: 29 August 2024 18:49:00

Com­ments sum­mary Dear Sir/​Madam, Plan­ning Applic­a­tion com­ments have been made. A sum­mary of the com­ments is provided below. Com­ments were sub­mit­ted at 29/08/2024 6:48 PM from Mr Eric Sharkey.

Applic­a­tion Sum­mary Address: Land NE Of Heath­er Cot­tage Dal­faber Drive Aviemore Pro­pos­al: Erec­tion of 3No. houses (2018/0183/MSC) Case Officer: Julie-Ann Bain

Click for fur­ther information

Cus­tom­er Details Name: Mr Eric Shar­key Email: Address: 

Com­ments Details Com­menter Type: Mem­ber of Pub­lic Stance: Cus­tom­er objects to the Plan­ning Applic­a­tion Reas­ons for com­ment: Com­ments: With regards to this applic­a­tion I would firstly observe that, as a neigh­bour­ing prop­erty we have not been served with due notice of the applic­a­tion. I would fur­ther observe that giv­en the ori­ent­a­tion of these houses we are going to have three houses look­ing into our prop­erty, unduly affect­ing our pri­vacy. Were they to be re-ori­ented to look to the east this would have less impact.

I am assum­ing from the draw­ings that these are afford­able houses. I would respect­fully sug­gest that these should not be shoe­horned into the top corner of this devel­op­ment, but should be incor­por­ated into the main body of the devel­op­ment to encour­age social inclusion.

Kind regards

Read our plan for the future: cairngorms​.co​.uk/​P​a​r​t​n​e​r​s​h​i​pPlan — — -Ori­gin­al Mes­sage — — - From: Eric Shar­key Sent: 11 Septem­ber 2024 16:01 To: Colin Bry­ans colinbryans@​cairngorms.​co.​uk Sub­ject: Plan­ning applic­a­tion land NW of Heath­er Lane Aviemore

Colin, It was nice to meet you earli­er today. I went onto the High­land Coun­cil web­site, with a view to expand­ing our com­ments on this applic­a­tion. Due to the Nation­al Park hav­ing called in the applic­a­tion, com­ments are not being accep­ted at this time. I would like to add the fol­low­ing obser­va­tions. 1) This block of hous­ing would be in close prox­im­ity to our sep­tic tank which is to the west of the site, as we say it is eas­ily iden­ti­fied by the fen­cing around it. 2) The cur­rent plan­ning for Heath­er Lane is a single track road, with no passing places, which was to ser­vice two prop­er­ties in addi­tion to our own. With this applic­a­tion we would see a fur­ther two prop­er­ties on this road. Assum­ing two vehicles per house­hold, this would sub­stan­tially increase the volume of traffic.

If this applic­a­tion is approved I would ask that con­sid­er­a­tion be giv­en to the install­a­tion of a turn­ing point at the head of the road. My wife recently had to be taken away by ambu­lance, and due to the cur­rent lay­out the ambu­lance struggled to get turned.

I hope these points can be added to our objec­tions Thanks Eric Sent from my iPad 1