Skip to content
Please be aware the content below has been generated by an AI model from a source PDF.

Item7 34FarmRoadAviemoreCommitteeReport 20260018DET

Com­mit­tee report

Devel­op­ment proposed: Erec­tion of 2no. houses on Plots 58 (58A and B) at 34 Farm Road, Aviemore, PH22 1AP

Ref­er­ence: 2026/0018/DET Applic­ant: Dav­all Devel­op­ments Date called-in: 19 Janu­ary 2026 Recom­mend­a­tion: Approve sub­ject to con­di­tions and a leg­al agree­ment Case officer: Katie Crerar, Plan­ning Officer


Site Loc­a­tion

(Map of site loc­a­tion at 34 Farm Road, Aviemore, PH22 1AP, show­ing Dal­faber Indus­tri­al Estate, Craiggowrie Pl, Spey Ave, Dal­faber Pk, Cal­lart Rd, Track, Cor­rour Rd, Farm Rd, and the out­line of the pro­posed devel­op­ment area.)

This map has been pro­duced to aid in the stat­utory pro­cess of deal­ing with plan­ning applic­a­tions. The map is to help identi­fy the site and its sur­round­ings and to aid Plan­ning Officers, Com­mit­tee Mem­bers and the Pub­lic in the determ­in­a­tion of the pro­pos­al. Maps shown in the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Report can only be used for the pur­poses of the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee. Any oth­er use risks infringing Crown Copy­right and may lead to pro­sec­u­tion or civil pro­ceed­ings. Maps pro­duced with­in this Plan­ning Com­mit­tee Report can only be repro­duced with the express per­mis­sion of the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity and oth­er Copy­right hold­ers. This per­mis­sion must be gran­ted in advance.


Site descrip­tion, pro­pos­al and history

Site descrip­tion

  1. The pro­pos­al site con­sti­tutes a devel­op­ment plot on a wider res­id­en­tial devel­op­ment site, ori­gin­ally con­sist­ing of 104 dwell­ing houses, cur­rently under con­struc­tion. The site is loc­ated with­in the Aviemore set­tle­ment bound­ary, at the north­east­ern edge of the settlement.

Pro­pos­al

  1. The draw­ings and doc­u­ments asso­ci­ated with this applic­a­tion are lis­ted below and are avail­able on the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity web­site unless noted oth­er­wise: https://​www​.eplan​ningcnpa​.co​.uk/​o​n​l​i​n​e​-​a​p​p​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​a​p​p​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​D​e​t​a​i​l​s​.​d​o​?​a​c​t​i​v​e​T​a​b​=​d​o​c​u​m​e​n​t​s​&​k​e​y​V​a​l​=​T​8​V​4​P​7​S​I​0CP00
TitleDraw­ing num­berDate on plan*Date received
Plan – Loc­a­tion plan227790003 Rev B25/02/202516/01/2026
Plan – Site plan2277-PL-911 Rev B25/02/202516/01/2026
Plan – Pro­posed elev­a­tions sheet 1AV HT133-DET LH-200-ELE-00125/02/202516/01/2026
Plan – Pro­posed floor plansAV HT133-DET RH-230 – 01-00125/02/202516/02/2026
Plan — Pro­posed Elev­a­tions: Sheet 1AV HT133-DET RH-200-ELE-00125/02/202516/01/2026
Plan – Pro­posed floor plansAV HT133-DET LH-230 – 01-00125/02/202516/01/2026
Plan – Sur­face water plot drain­age (5 of 5)184 Rev G21/02/202516/01/2026
Plan – Private drain­age details (1 of 2)185 Rev F14/07/202316/01/2026
Plan – Private drain­age details 92 of 2)186 Rev A12/11/202416/01/2026

*Where no spe­cif­ic day of month has been provided on the plan, the sys­tem defaults to the first of the month.

  1. The pro­posed devel­op­ment is for the erec­tion of 2 no. three bed­room dwell­ing­houses to be loc­ated on a hous­ing plot pre­vi­ously con­sen­ted for the devel­op­ment of a single dwell­ing­house (Ref: PPA-2702127).

  2. An applic­a­tion for the pro­posed devel­op­ment was pre­vi­ously con­sidered by the Plan­ning Com­mit­tee on 28 August 2025 (applic­a­tion ref­er­ence 2025/0083/DET). The Com­mit­tee agreed to approve the applic­a­tion sub­ject to the con­clu­sion of a leg­al agree­ment or upfront pay­ment to secure a fin­an­cial con­tri­bu­tion of £9,675 towards afford­able hous­ing pro­vi­sion. The applic­ants did not pay this con­tri­bu­tion, and the decision notice was not issued. The applic­ants recon­sidered under­tak­ing the devel­op­ment of sub-divid­ing the plot and decided instead to retain it as a single plot with one dwell­ing on it as per the ori­gin­al plan­ning per­mis­sion for the wider devel­op­ment. They sub­sequently with­drew the application.

  3. The applic­ants now want to pur­sue the sub­di­vi­sion of the plot and there­fore have resub­mit­ted the applic­a­tion which seeks approv­al for the same devel­op­ment pro­pos­al, in all respects, that was pre­vi­ously con­sidered by the Plan­ning Committee.

His­tory

  1. There has been an extens­ive his­tory relat­ing to hous­ing devel­op­ment on this site, as follows:

    a) 05/101/CP – Devel­op­ment of 101 ser­viced house plots with asso­ci­ated roads, access points, ser­vices and land­scap­ing (out­line) at Dal­faber North, Aviemore. Refused on 16 Novem­ber 2006. Approv­al was gran­ted on appeal (ref­er­ence P/PPA/01/8) for up to 104 houses in total. This applic­a­tion was also unsuc­cess­fully chal­lenged at the Court of Ses­sion. b) 07/144/CP – Devel­op­ment of 20 ser­viced plots at Land North West of Dal­faber Farm, Dal­faber Drive, Aviemore. Approved by Plan­ning Com­mit­tee sub­ject to a leg­al agree­ment; this was nev­er signed. Applic­ant appealed against non-determ­in­a­tion. Appeal allowed on 11 March 2010 (ref­er­ence PPA-0012000). c) 07/145/CP – Devel­op­ment of 104 houses at Land North West and South of Former Stead­ings, Dal­faber Farm, Dal­faber, Aviemore. Approved by Plan­ning Com­mit­tee sub­ject to a leg­al agree­ment; this was nev­er signed. Applic­ant appealed against non-determ­in­a­tion. Appeal allowed on 11 March 2010 (ref­er­ence PPA-0012001). Applic­a­tions 07/0144/CP and 17/0145/CP com­bined cov­er the site of 05/101/CP. d) 2013/0073/MSC – Approv­al of Mat­ters Spe­cified in Con­di­tions 1 (Plans & Par­tic­u­lars), 4 (Land­scap­ing Inform­a­tion re: Trees), 8 (Details required by Con­di­tion 1), 9 (Man­age­ment and Main­ten­ance State­ment), 10 (Details required by Con­di­tion 1), 11 (Phas­ing Plan), 12 (Detailed Design State­ment), 14 (Con­toured Site Plan), 16 (Con­struc­tion Meth­od State­ment), 17 (Man­age­ment and Main­ten­ance State­ment), 19 (Pro­gramme of Archae­olo­gic­al Work) of Plan­ning Per­mis­sion in Prin­ciple 07/144/CP at Land to the North West of Dal­faber Farm House, Aviemore. Applic­a­tion refused on leg­al grounds at Plan­ning Com­mit­tee on 19 Feb­ru­ary 2015. Appeal allowed on 21 March 2016 (ref­er­ence PPA-0012016). e) 2013/0074/MSC – Approv­al of Mat­ters Spe­cified in Con­di­tions 1 (Plans & Par­tic­u­lars), 8 (details required by Condition1 ), 9 (Man­age­ment & Main­ten­ance State­ment), 10 (Details required by Con­di­tion 1), 12 (Phas­ing Plan), 13 (Detailed Design State­ment), 15 (Site Plan), 17 (Con­struc­tion Meth­od State­ment), 18 (Man­age­ment and Main­ten­ance State­ment), 20 (Pro­gramme of Archae­olo­gic­al Work) of Plan­ning Per­mis­sion in Prin­ciple — 07/0145/CP at Land North West and South of Former Stead­ings Dal­faber Farm, Dal­faber Drive, Aviemore. Applic­a­tion refused on leg­al grounds at Plan­ning Com­mit­tee on 19 Feb­ru­ary 2015. Appeal allowed on 21 March 2016 (ref­er­ence PPA-0012017). f) 2014/0397/DET – Applic­a­tion under Sec­tion 42 to vary to con­di­tions 1, 11, 12 and 21 on per­mis­sion ref PPA-0012000 (07/93/OUTBS (07/144/CP)) at Land North West of Dal­faber Farm, Dal­faber Drive, Aviemore. Not called in on leg­al grounds and dealt with by the High­land Coun­cil. Applic­ant appealed against non-determ­in­a­tion. Appeal allowed on 21 March 2016 (ref­er­ence PPA-2702127). g) 2014/0399/DET – Applic­a­tion under Sec­tion 42 to vary con­di­tions 1, 12, 13 and 22 of con­sent PPA-0012001 (07/94/OUTBS (07/0145/CP)) at Land North West and South of Former Stead­ings, Dal­faber Farm, Dal­faber Drive, Aviemore. Not called in on leg­al grounds and dealt with by the High­land Coun­cil. Applic­ant appealed against non-determ­in­a­tion. Appeal allowed on 21 March 2016 (ref­er­ence PPA-2702126). h) 2018/0183/MSC — Applic­a­tion to sat­is­fy the con­di­tions of Plan­ning Per­mis­sion PPA-2702127 for res­id­en­tial units at land to the South of Dal­faber Farm. Applic­a­tion gran­ted 15 Novem­ber 2018. i) 2025/0083/DET — Erec­tion of 2no. houses on Plots 58 (58A and B) at 34 Farm Road Aviemore PH22 1AP. Applic­a­tion was approved by the Nation­al Park Authority’s Plan­ning Com­mit­tee sub­ject to con­clu­sion of a leg­al agree­ment or upfront pay­ment to secure a fin­an­cial con­tri­bu­tion towards afford­able hous­ing pro­vi­sion but then with­drawn before the decision notice was issued.


Hab­it­ats reg­u­la­tions appraisal

  1. It is not con­sidered that the pro­posed devel­op­ment is likely to have a sig­ni­fic­ant impact upon a des­ig­nated European Site. As such, a Hab­it­ats Reg­u­la­tions Apprais­al (HRA) is not required in this case.

Devel­op­ment plan context

Policies

Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) Scot­land 2045

Nation­al policyPolicies rel­ev­ant to this applic­a­tion are marked with a cross (x)
Policy 1Tack­ling the cli­mate and nature crisesX
Policy 2Cli­mate mit­ig­a­tion and adaptation
Policy 3Biod­iversityX
Policy 4Nat­ur­al places
Policy 5Soils
Policy 6Forestry, wood­land and trees
Policy 7His­tor­ic assets and places
Policy 8Green belts
Policy 9Brown­field, vacant and derel­ict land, and empty buildings
Policy 11Energy
Policy 12Zero waste
Policy 13Sus­tain­able transport
Policy 14Design, qual­ity and placeX
Policy 15Loc­al liv­ing and 20 minute neighbourhoods
Policy 16Qual­ity homesX
Policy 17Rur­al homes
Policy 18Infra­struc­ture first
Policy 19Heat­ing and cooling
Policy 20Blue and green infrastructure
Policy 21Play, recre­ation and sport
Policy 22Flood risk and water managementX
Policy 23Health and safety
Policy 24Digit­al infrastructure
Policy 25Com­munity wealth building
Policy 26Busi­ness and industry
Policy 27City, town, loc­al and com­mer­cial centres
Policy 28Retail
Policy 29Rur­al development
Policy 30Tour­ism
Policy 31Cul­ture and creativity
Policy 32Aquacul­ture
Policy 33Min­er­als

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Part­ner­ship Plan 2022 – 2027

Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan (2021)

Loc­al plan policyPolicies rel­ev­ant to this applic­a­tion are marked with a cross (x)
Policy 1New hous­ing developmentX
Policy 2Sup­port­ing eco­nom­ic growth
Policy 3Design and placemakingX
Policy 4Nat­ur­al heritageX
Policy 5Land­scapeX
Policy 6The sit­ing and design of digit­al com­mu­nic­a­tions equipment
Policy 7Renew­able energy
Policy 8Open space, sport and recreation
Policy 9Cul­tur­al heritage
Policy 10ResourcesX
Policy 11Developer oblig­a­tionsX
  1. All new devel­op­ment pro­pos­als require to be assessed in rela­tion to policies con­tained in the adop­ted Devel­op­ment Plan which com­prises Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) and the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2021 (LDP). The full word­ing of policies can be found at: https://www.gov.scot/publications/national-planning-framework‑4/documents/ and at: https://​cairngorms​.co​.uk/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2021​/​03​/​C​N​P​A​-​L​D​P​-​2021​-​w​e​b.pdf

Plan­ning guidance

  1. Sup­ple­ment­ary guid­ance also sup­ports the Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan and provides more details about how to com­ply with the policies. Guid­ance that is rel­ev­ant to this applic­a­tion is marked with a cross (x).
PolicyDescrip­tion
Policy 1Hous­ing sup­ple­ment­ary guidanceX
Policy 2Sup­port­ing eco­nom­ic growth non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 3Design and place­mak­ing non-stat­utory guidanceX
Policy 4Nat­ur­al her­it­age non-stat­utory guidanceX
Policy 5Land­scape non-stat­utory guidanceX
Policy 7Renew­able energy non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 8Open space, sport and recre­ation non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 9Cul­tur­al her­it­age non-stat­utory guidance
Policy 10Resources non-stat­utory guidanceX
Policy 11Developer oblig­a­tions sup­ple­ment­ary guidanceX

Con­sulta­tions

  1. A sum­mary of the main issues raised by con­sul­tees now follows:

  2. High­land Coun­cil Archae­ology Officers raised no con­cerns regard­ing the proposal.

  3. The High­land Coun­cil Flood Risk Man­age­ment Team raised no con­cerns with the proposal.

  4. Aviemore Com­munity Coun­cil raised the issue of wheth­er a great­er amount of afford­able hous­ing pro­vi­sion or oth­er com­munity bene­fit should be provided giv­en the increase in over­all num­ber of houses. They quer­ied how this pro­pos­al may affect the afford­able hous­ing con­tri­bu­tions agreed for the wider development.

Rep­res­ent­a­tions

  1. No rep­res­ent­a­tions were received.

Apprais­al

  1. Sec­tion 25 of the Town and Coun­try Plan­ning (Scot­land) Act 1997 (as amended) requires applic­a­tions to be determ­ined in accord­ance with the Devel­op­ment Plan. This com­prises Nation­al Plan­ning Frame­work 4 (NPF4) and the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Loc­al Devel­op­ment Plan 2021 (LDP). Where there is con­flict between policies, NPF4 policies take precedence.

Prin­ciple

  1. NPF4 Policy 1 Tack­ling the cli­mate and nature crises states that when con­sid­er­ing all devel­op­ment pro­pos­als sig­ni­fic­ant weight will be giv­en to the glob­al cli­mate and nature crises.

  2. NPF4 Policy 16: Qual­ity homes states that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als for new homes on land alloc­ated for hous­ing in LDPs will be supported.

  3. LDP Policy 1: New hous­ing devel­op­ment states that pro­pos­als for hous­ing will be sup­por­ted where they are loc­ated on an iden­ti­fied alloc­ated site.

  4. The pro­pos­al site is loc­ated with­in hous­ing alloc­a­tion site H1, as alloc­ated by the LDP, and is loc­ated with­in the con­sen­ted res­id­en­tial devel­op­ment site. The prin­ciple of res­id­en­tial devel­op­ment on the site is estab­lished, accept­able and in this respect com­plies with NPF4 Policy 16: Qual­ity homes and LDP Policy 1: New hous­ing devel­op­ment. The prin­ciple of the pro­posed devel­op­ment loc­ated on a site sub­ject to an exist­ing con­sent, with­in an exist­ing set­tle­ment and with­in easy walk­ing dis­tance of amen­it­ies, is also con­sidered to be in accord­ance with the prin­ciple of NPF4 policy 1, sub­ject to com­pli­ance with oth­er detailed policies.

Afford­able housing

  1. The pro­posed houses do not con­sti­tute afford­able hous­ing as defined by the LDP, how­ever LDP Policy 1.5: Afford­able hous­ing states that devel­op­ments of few­er than four mar­ket houses do not have to make an onsite provision.

  2. Giv­en, how­ever, that this applic­a­tion pro­poses to devel­op two houses on a plot pre­vi­ously con­sen­ted for one house as part of a wider res­id­en­tial devel­op­ment, which itself was sub­ject to an afford­able hous­ing pro­vi­sion require­ment, it is appro­pri­ate that this applic­a­tion makes a pro­por­tion­ate con­tri­bu­tion to afford­able hous­ing provision.

  3. With the total num­ber of units being delivered on the wider site now increas­ing by one addi­tion­al unit, it is appro­pri­ate to cap­ture this uplift and the sub­sequent uplift in afford­able hous­ing require­ment in accord­ance with the adop­ted LDP, which stip­u­lates a 45% afford­able hous­ing require­ment for sites in Aviemore.

  4. As such, a leg­al agree­ment or upfront con­tri­bu­tion to secure a com­muted sum of £9,675 is pro­posed, which rep­res­ents 45% of the cur­rent com­muted sum rate for a single afford­able hous­ing plot. This has been dis­cussed and agreed with the applicant.

Lay­out and design

  1. NPF4 Policy 14: Design, qual­ity and place seeks to ensure that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als improve the qual­ity of the area and are con­sist­ent with the six qual­it­ies of suc­cess­ful places: healthy; pleas­ant; con­nec­ted; dis­tinct­ive; sus­tain­able; and adaptable.

  2. LDP Policy 3: Design and place­mak­ing also seeks to ensure that pro­pos­als improve the qual­ity of the area and are con­sist­ent with the six qual­it­ies of suc­cess­ful places.

  3. LDP Policy 5: Land­scape pre­sumes against devel­op­ment that does not con­serve and enhance the land­scape char­ac­ter and spe­cial qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park and, in par­tic­u­lar, the set­ting of the pro­posed development.

  4. The pro­posed devel­op­ment is of a design, scale and char­ac­ter that is in keep­ing with both that of the loc­al town­scape and that of the wider con­sen­ted devel­op­ment. The scale and mass­ing of the pro­posed devel­op­ment will also have little to no tan­gible impact on the land­scape char­ac­ter or spe­cial qual­it­ies of the Nation­al Park.

  5. The mater­i­als pro­posed include white render, uPVC framed win­dows, uPVC doors and con­crete roof tiles, and are appro­pri­ate for the set­ting. The pro­posed devel­op­ment will not appear incon­gru­ous with­in the set­ting of the wider con­sen­ted development.

  6. The roads, access and ser­vi­cing arrange­ments remain sim­il­ar to that of the approved design, with no con­sequen­tial changes.

  7. The pro­pos­al is there­fore in accord­ance with NPF4 Policy 14: Design, qual­ity and place and with LDP Policy 3: Design and place­mak­ing and Policy 5: Landscape.

Envir­on­ment

  1. NPF4 Policy 3: Biod­iversity seeks to ensure that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als pro­tect biod­iversity, reverse biod­iversity loss, deliv­er pos­it­ive effects from devel­op­ment and strengthen nature net­works. Devel­op­ment pro­pos­als must include appro­pri­ate meas­ures to con­serve, restore and enhance biod­iversity, in accord­ance with nation­al and loc­al guidance.

  2. NPF4 Policy 4: Nat­ur­al places seeks to ensure that devel­op­ment pro­pos­als pro­tect, restore and enhance nat­ur­al assets mak­ing best use of nature-based solu­tions. Devel­op­ment that has sig­ni­fic­ant adverse impacts on des­ig­nated sites, after mit­ig­a­tion, will not be supported.

  3. LDP Policy 4: Nat­ur­al her­it­age seeks to ensure that there are no adverse effects on European Pro­tec­ted Spe­cies and oth­er biod­iversity interests.

  4. The pro­pos­al does not include any spe­cif­ic meas­ures con­cern­ing biod­iversity enhance­ment. How­ever, as the pro­pos­al seeks to devel­op a plot with an extant per­mis­sion for a dwell­ing­house loc­ated with­in a wider site under­go­ing res­id­en­tial devel­op­ment, it is con­sidered that biod­iversity enhance­ment solely in rela­tion to this applic­a­tion is not required.

  5. Sim­il­arly, wider issues relat­ing to nat­ur­al her­it­age and eco­logy have been addressed sat­is­fact­or­ily through the con­sid­er­a­tion and approv­al of the wider exist­ing consent(s), and this pro­posed devel­op­ment is of a scale and nature which will not have any unac­cept­able det­ri­ment­al impacts on biod­iversity and nat­ur­al heritage.

  6. The pro­pos­al there­fore com­plies with NPF4 Policy 3: Biod­iversity, NPF4 Policy 4: Nat­ur­al places and LDP Policy 4: Nat­ur­al heritage.

Flood­ing and sur­face water

  1. NPF4 Policy 22: Flood risk and water man­age­ment seeks to ensure that devel­op­ments are resi­li­ent to cur­rent and future flood risk.

  2. LDP Policy 10: Resources requires that all devel­op­ments should be free from flood risk and not increase the risk of flood­ing elsewhere.

  3. There are no con­cerns regard­ing flood risk at the pro­pos­al site and the pro­posed drain­age design remains largely as pre­vi­ously consented.

  4. The pro­pos­al is there­fore in accord­ance with NPF4 Policy 22: Flood risk and water man­age­ment and LDP Policy 10: Resources.


Developer Oblig­a­tions

  1. LDP Policy 11: Developer oblig­a­tions sets out that where devel­op­ment gives rise to a need to increase or improve pub­lic ser­vices, facil­it­ies or infra­struc­ture or mit­ig­ate adverse effects then the developer will nor­mally be required to make a fair and reas­on­able con­tri­bu­tion towards addi­tion­al costs or requirements.

  2. The applic­ant has agreed to the pay­ment of a fin­an­cial con­tri­bu­tion towards afford­able hous­ing pro­vi­sion. No oth­er plan­ning oblig­a­tions are required in this instance.

Con­clu­sion

  1. This pro­pos­al for two houses on a pre-exist­ing res­id­en­tial devel­op­ment plot is accept­able in prin­ciple and the details of the pro­posed design, lay­out and mater­i­als are accept­able and in keep­ing with the char­ac­ter of the area.

  2. The pro­posed devel­op­ment com­plies with the rel­ev­ant policies of NPF4 and the LDP, sub­ject to an appro­pri­ate leg­al agree­ment or upfront pay­ment to secure the neces­sary afford­able hous­ing con­tri­bu­tion, and there are no oth­er mater­i­al con­sid­er­a­tions which out­weigh this conclusion.

Recom­mend­a­tion

That mem­bers of the com­mit­tee sup­port a recom­mend­a­tion to APPROVE the applic­a­tion for the erec­tion of 2no. houses on Plots 58 (58A and B) at 34 Farm Road Aviemore PH22 1AP, sub­ject to:

  1. Con­clu­sion of a leg­al agree­ment or upfront pay­ment to secure a fin­an­cial con­tri­bu­tion towards afford­able hous­ing pro­vi­sion; and
  2. The recom­men­ded conditions.

Con­di­tions

Those con­di­tions lis­ted below in bold text are sus­pens­ive con­di­tions, which require to be dis­charged pri­or to imple­ment­a­tion of the development.

  1. The devel­op­ment to which this per­mis­sion relates must be begun not later than the expir­a­tion of three years begin­ning with the date on which the per­mis­sion is granted.

    Reas­on: The time lim­it con­di­tion is imposed in order to com­ply with the require­ments of sec­tion 58 of the Town and Coun­try Plan­ning (Scot­land) Act 1997 as amended.

Inform­at­ives

  1. The per­son under­tak­ing the devel­op­ment is required to give the Plan­ning Author­ity pri­or writ­ten noti­fic­a­tion of the date which it is inten­ded to com­mence the devel­op­ment. Attached to this decision notice is a Notice of Ini­ti­ation of Devel­op­ment for com­ple­tion and sub­mis­sion. Sub­mis­sion of this inform­a­tion assists the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Mon­it­or­ing and Enforce­ment Officer in mon­it­or­ing act­ive work with­in the area to ensure com­pli­ance with the approved details and to identi­fy and cor­rect any poten­tial prob­lems, as they arise, rather than later when it may be more dif­fi­cult and more costly to rec­ti­fy. Fail­ure to give notice would con­sti­tute a breach of plan­ning con­trol which may res­ult in enforce­ment action being taken.

  2. Fol­low­ing com­ple­tion of the devel­op­ment, a noti­fic­a­tion of com­ple­tion shall, as soon as prac­tic­able, be giv­en to the Plan­ning Author­ity. Attached to this decision notice is a Notice of Com­ple­tion of Devel­op­ment for com­ple­tion and sub­mis­sion. Sub­mis­sion of this form will assist the Cairngorms Nation­al Park Author­ity Mon­it­or­ing and Enforce­ment Officer in mak­ing a final inspec­tion and check­ing com­pli­ance with the approved draw­ings and con­di­tions. If the devel­op­ment hereby approved is to be car­ried out in phases, then a notice of com­ple­tion should be sub­mit­ted at the com­ple­tion of each phase.

  3. Con­struc­tion work (includ­ing the loading/​unloading of deliv­ery vehicles, plant or oth­er machinery) should not take place out with the hours of 0800 hours to 1900 hours Mondays to Fri­days, 0800 hours to 1300 hours on Sat­urdays, or at any time or Bank Hol­i­days to min­im­ise dis­turb­ance to res­id­ents in the area.

×

We want your feedback

Thank you for visiting our new website. We'd appreciate any feedback using our quick feedback form. Your thoughts make a big difference.

Thank you!