Post session 6 - Survey responses (anon)

This document contains insights and suggestions regarding the operation of a community fund, likely for the Cairngorms National Park. It discusses whether applicants should be allowed to apply more than once and the role match funding might play, with varied opinions on both. The feedback defines 'meaningful benefit' to the Cairngorms community as projects that improve life, foster skills, enhance wellbeing, and align with the Cairngorms 2030 aims, also stressing inclusivity and sustainability. Participants shared views on how geographical spread should influence decision-making to ensure fair access for smaller communities and outlined the required application information for small, medium, and large grants, focusing on project details, benefits, and feasibility. The document also addresses reporting and accountability for grantees, visioning success as a broad impact across the Cairngorms National Park with enduring legacy, and identifies potential deterrents like complex application processes or perceived ineligibility.